Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If i use a RB25 turbo, does the dump have to be changed from my 25? Im asking a heap of questions i know, but i want to make sure i go the right way, and since i have quite a good dump pipe, dont want to get another one made which i will have to with a VG30 turbo. Also is the compressor outlet on the RB25 turbo the same size as the 20?

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nope... The RB25 turbo is a direct bolt on replacement, everything is the same to the RB20DET turbo.

The VG30 requires a little bit of modification to the turbo compressor outlet. As the VG30 one is larger than the RB20.

If you get a BB core VG30 which is around the $500 mark all the existing oil/water lines will bolt straight in.

hmm, think i know what im going to go towards.. as much as i would want more power.. How much more power could i squeeze from the VG over the 25 if they were both at the same level of tune?

Ultimatley i know i'll be dissapointed if it has poor throttle response, hense the VG wont keep me satisfied over the 25 :D

Ive got an RB25 turbo in my garage, looking at it your RB20 dump pipe will bolt up to it as they seem to have the same flange pattern.

I guess that makes sense as they are both generic T3 housings.

An RB20DET requires less air at any given RPM compared to a RB25 or VG30 at that same RPM.

Joel is that true, or is it an assumption. (Note for the senstive, this is not a challenge, just a question resulting from a geniune interest... so Joel, schools in and im listening)

The equation to work out CFM of an engine reqiures engine size, (ok that supports what you are saying) and also engine efficiency. Whether the engines have the same efficiency i have no idea.

It is true.. :D

This is why a larger capacity engine doesn't have to rev as hard to make the same power. I.e RB26 compared to a RB30.

The RB30 is using similiar amounts of air at 7000rpm to the RB26 at 8500rpm.

As mentioned earlier, its the luck of the draw.

If you get a good turbo it will last if you don't it could die on standard boost.

Also just as a note the VG30 turbo has a smaller compressor but larger exhaust compared to the RB25 turbo.

You could get really technical about the efficiency.

The RB25 head is known to flow better than the RB20 head so... theoretically that will allow more head room for more boost as there is more of a restriction to the airflow which in turn creates boost.

But really I think both are twin cam heads unless you are running up over 400hp where the RB20DET head starts to hit a brick wall, that is were the ability for air to flow in to the pots of the RB20DET will start to require more and more boost to get the same amount of air in with comparison to a more free flowing head (RB25).

Do a search plenty has been posted on this for a while.

I think Sydneykid made a good post also.

He also stated that the force (boost) on the exhaust/compressor wheels also pose a problem.

Just read the Performance forum posts, it still sounds like a game of paper, scissors, rock.

The theory sounds right, but its practical application may not be as pronounced as a snapshot of the theory would have you believe.

Luke if the VG30 needs mods to fit, id strick with the R33/34 turbos.

The variability of steel wheel/ceramic wheel, ball bearing/plain bearing VG30 turbos getting around, plus the age of the turbo all go against it.

Based on the experince of others with regards to lag and power the RB25 turbos sound the way to go. When its time to upgrade to your bigger turbo again, i think you will move the RB25 turbo a litle quicker as well.

Oh yeh sorry to throw another spanner in the works, i saw your post rebuying hte VG30 turbo.:D

If my boy Luke says he can run 50psi, then my boy can run 50psi. Or is that eggs?

Be sure to check with someone that knows RBs well. I think you will find that the RB20 isnt the best option head to be uing with RB30 bottom end.

The head stud diameters are different diamters and im not sure about the effect the smaller combustion chamber has on the larger bore/compression ratio

Originally posted by Bl4cK32

Yeah mate - not all of us have the supply of parts, and spend grands on tuning to squeeze out 250kw out of an rb20. How much money do you think it would cost to get 250 kw out of it -10g?

Now compare it to say an rb30 bottom end with a 25 head. Im told this engine produces the same output as the rb20det with no turbo. 10g compared to say 2g for a rebuilt motor package. Thats what I was trying to say.

Comments like this make me think how many idiots there are.

I got around 300kw;'s at the engine using a hi flow rb20 turbo front mount and a rechip. Gee how much did i spend. not even 2k so far.

Lets keep it civil guys

Ive seen in a dyno chart of an RB25/30 NA engine with i recall about 120rwkws. I suppose thats kinda RB20 turbo power.

My thoughts are that 250rwkws isnt all that difficult if you aleardy have say 200rwkws.

You already have ECU re-tuned, most likely a better fuelling system, full exhaust/filter, clutch blah blah blah. So other then bigger injectors it really comes down to turbo slection which is what Luke is asking.

RB30 NA's dont put out 120kw;s at wheels. I had one with a few mods was lucky to push out 98kw;'s at wheels.

Im not knocking the RB30DET as im building one myself , but you cant take away the power a rb20 can make with reasonably small mods.

u can make 300hp at wheels outta them with stock injectors , ECU , and AFM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...