Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dont waste your time with a walbro, the stock pump will be fine for the stock turbo, unless the stock pump is faulty.

When my car had the stock r33 smic, i noticed a difference in performance when upgrading to a fmic. It did have a tiny bit less throttle response, but it seem to raise the boost and also received alot of cold dense air.

Id say get a tune, he could probaly adjust afr's again and make the car more economical. Dont worry just about power, there's a saving just by having a clean tune. Whats $200 when you might spend an extra $20 on fuel a week from a rich tune.

Tune it if you plan not to mod it anytime soon.

Cheers

Daniel

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you will probaly get more power after the tune down low, not more power than before the FMIC was added.... but more power than what it is making now. i find you can usually wind in a bit more timing .

honestley i would do a few more mods then look at a tune, remmeber if the cooler is a good cooler (not a cheap bar and plate jobbie) the gains from a retune will be higher as the soak threshhold is higher and you can afford to leave more timing in up top, without the worry of det. Aslo a better cooler will have a denser charge so if its map based you can run into issues and there is more chance of problems... as your is afm based you dont need to worry.

cheers trent. the fmic is a tube and fin, just jap type2. and as far as top end power figures, i'm not too hung up on those. i just want the best driveability.

i know what u mean about bringing it back up to the power it had before the fmic, coz i think midrange has suffered a bit, bit it feels as though top end has increased.

I think i will take it for a tune today. i'll let you guys know how it goes.

since you are going to get it redone.

Can you please get a "as it is right now" dyno sheet showing power x rpm and boost

and one when he is finished with same stats.

Just so people can see the difference between FMIC and no changes to FMIC and retune.

then they can also decide if it's worth it or not.

like you said, top end may not change, but the midrange might.

Also, if you have a dyno sheet with the way the car was with same mods but with the R34 SMIC it would be a good comparison too.

Edited by GTST

well guess what? it wasnt different at all. the afr's and boost levels (unichip ebc unit) were identical in the 34smic run 3 months ago, and today's fmic runs.

the guys put the car on the dyno, and did a couple of power runs to get a baseline. the tuner wasnt there at the time (but had a very good reason :D )

anyway, results were the same. power was down 4kw, but then they warned me everyone's cars had been down 5 - 10 kw lately coz of the weather.

the tuner called in to say he wouldnt be back for ages, so they DIDNT charge me for the power runs (coz they're not trying to get rich off me by recommending fmic's and tunes, contrary to some specualtion earlier... cough* GTST :))

they recommended i go back when he was there and get him to see if there would be any benefit from some timing and boost adjustments, if i really wanted it re-tuned. but advised me that the tune was still well within safe limits, and i may procceed to go do donuts if i wish. lol. which of course i do not wish.

i had a chat with the power run dude, and he assured me the fmic is not wasted as it provides a decent safety margin against detonation when running higher boost. and although 12psi on a stocker is at the lower end of that bracket, it's still warranted.

also, sitting around in there for an hour or so makes me want a new turbo. why does that happen?? some kind of subliminal marketing ploy?

so if someone's selling a used gt-rs.... ahh forget it :)

aaaaaaaaaaaand one more thing. the night i finished installing the cooler, i felt no mid/low range lull at all. so maybe the humidity/heat is actually playing a part in that?

anyway, i'll advise of any further developments if they arise.

Edited by Munkyb0y
why would he have a rich tune?

it is already tuned.

why would a FMIC make it run rich?

IF anything, if the FMIC cools the air alot, it will run leaner.

therefore saving him fuel going by your thoughts.

Going from my experience on my car, it ran rich aswell as lean. The stock computer jerks around big time. I was not taking into consideration his tuned unichip though and was refering to a stock untuned ecu.

After imy car was tuned, fuel economy was much better.

Id always have to wash the black smoke of the back bumper when it wasnt tuned and it was hitting R&R constantly.

Munky, surely it wouldnt lose power on the overall figure. Id definately say its due to the heat and humidity. Good luck with it all, as its a very interesting topic/test.

Cheers

well guess what? it wasnt different at all. the afr's and boost levels (unichip ebc unit) were identical in the 34smic run 3 months ago, and today's fmic runs.

the guys put the car on the dyno, and did a couple of power runs to get a baseline. the tuner wasnt there at the time (but had a very good reason :laugh: )

anyway, results were the same. power was down 4kw, but then they warned me everyone's cars had been down 5 - 10 kw lately coz of the weather.

the tuner called in to say he wouldnt be back for ages, so they DIDNT charge me for the power runs (coz they're not trying to get rich off me by recommending fmic's and tunes, contrary to some specualtion earlier... cough* GTST :cheers:)

they recommended i go back when he was there and get him to see if there would be any benefit from some timing and boost adjustments, if i really wanted it re-tuned. but advised me that the tune was still well within safe limits, and i may procceed to go do donuts if i wish. lol. which of course i do not wish.

i had a chat with the power run dude, and he assured me the fmic is not wasted as it provides a decent safety margin against detonation when running higher boost. and although 12psi on a stocker is at the lower end of that bracket, it's still warranted.

also, sitting around in there for an hour or so makes me want a new turbo. why does that happen?? some kind of subliminal marketing ploy?

so if someone's selling a used gt-rs.... ahh forget it :)

aaaaaaaaaaaand one more thing. the night i finished installing the cooler, i felt no mid/low range lull at all. so maybe the humidity/heat is actually playing a part in that?

anyway, i'll advise of any further developments if they arise.

So...

Apart from your little dig at me, the rest was true.

1.) you gained nothing from and FMIC (and actually lost 4kw which is "apparently" due to the weather)

2.) you wasted an hour of your time

3.) You were told to bring it back when the tuner was there so he could try to put some timing in to it and give you more power (maybe your 4kw back) and take your $250 then.

4.) You haven't posted dyno graphs of the SMIC run and the current run for comparison.

They told you you lost 4kw due to weather.

fair enough.

if you had 190 and yesterday got 186...

that is a max power figure.

how about midrange?

that is why I was asking for the 2 graphs (now and back with the SMIC)

And I know you won't feel the throttle response change.

You would only notice it if you went "BACK" to the smic (which you won't bother doing now)

GTST, you are the most cynical, negative, depressing and demeaning kunt i have come accross on these forums.

Luckily i havent encountered many of your posts before, but those i have all seem to be along the same vein.

Dont post in my threads anymore. you make people wanna kill themselves.

and fyi, they didnt tell me to go back and spend 250. they said if i still wanted to, that the tuner would be able to tell me more, as it was me that was insisting, not them.

and i WILL be taking my car back. coz i know if the tuner decides theres room for improvement, there will be results. and if not, then theres nothing lost, except a precious hour of my time, spent at a dyno, getting some power runs in for free.

The car goes noticeably harder up top, therefore there was no real 4kw loss (which is a fuccken joke to even be discussing, and is the kind of thing bitches get hung up on).

cry me a river you panzy...

if you don't want opinions, why ask for them?

not everyone is going to agree with you.

not everyone is going to talk to you in the manner that you want.

for f*ks sake.

All I was stating were the facts.

and they are that you didn't need the fmic over the R34 SMIC.

it was proven on the dyno.

you admitted to it.

I just said it like it is.

you don't like it that's your problem.

here we go.

firstly, ppl's opinions are often helpful, including those that oppose my own. but yours are ridiculously negative ALL THE TIME.

you may think i have a problem with facts you stated. but i dont. it's the way you go about it.

anyway, lets not turn this into a bitch fest. just dont post in my threads, and thanks for your input thus far. i seriously dont care enough to go on about this sh1t.

cheers

for the rest, i'm happy with the cooler, as said earlier, safety margin if your gonna push your setup is kinda important. i know others agree with is. and we all know theres no power gain from an intercooler. so theres no real shock there. also a nice meaty break of traction in 2nd yesterday (on 18/265's) was better than i'd had previous to the cooler, so i dont see how it was a step backwards at all.

the figures (for what it's worth) 211kw 3 months ago, 207.7kw yesterday. which is actually more like a 3kw difference. and runs 3 months apart will rarely get you the same figure, especially when theyre in different seasons of the year.

ba ba ba GTST, dont reply. theres other threads out there that need your attention

^^^ Monkyboy, GTST might come across as rude and what ever but you asked a question

and he answered it, and many other have agreed with him.

It isn't worth a retune not much will change, save the money and buy a fuel pump as they will run out

between 180 - 200kw.

Also from past experience URAS has a lot of knowledge and he even said don't bother.

dude, i'm not here to discuss GTST. his input was appreciated, his demeaning manner wasnt.

i asked uras to look in and give me his opinion, coz i know he knows his stuff.

and what uras said was exactly what i worked out yesterday, the tune will bring things back into line, but dont expect power gains.

edit: another important thing to note. the guys at the dyno told me that many times, after a fmic install, some cars wont run right until they are re-tuned. so if you're experiencing this, you might want to consider it. my mechanic told me he's done a few installs that resulted in cars running crap till the tune too.

Edited by Munkyb0y

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done this both ways, I'd use the original loom & swap plugs on the engine side as you'll usually end up changing a lot of those anyway. Series 1 is usually non ABS which requires wiring which I can't remember how to do as haven't done it for over 15 years. The auto inhibitor is easy to bypass or in the meantime you can put it in neutral & unbolt it & tape it somewhere in the bay haha, then just wire reverse lights. I'd go straight to aftermarket ecu. A few basics are built in ignitor coils & reverse the CAS wiring, sort the plugs for whatever injectors & IAC-you can use an adaptor for the neo type otherwise the s1 will still work, use the knock sensors that suit the loom & it'll be pretty much running.  
    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
×
×
  • Create New...