Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well, for what must be about the most maligned Rb engine out there, it does ok. I mean over the standing half mile (where the rwd launch hurts vs AWD) , a Z-Tune on RE55s ran a 17.29sec, my little RB20 did ok to run a 17.98 at Shepparton Airport. A worked 996 Turbo did a 16.32...so its not just a peaky power figure either. For a 2L they can make a good spread of power and the dougy bottom end can be masked as its in a relatively light platform. No way you woudl want to be pulling any more then 1270kgs with only 2L.

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 3 weeks later...

There was a blue coloured R32 with stroked RB20 (RB24) that

I have seen for sale in Japan (built for dragracing) that produced

around 550ps.

Here's what looks like another stroked RB20 in a 180sx with a huge

T51R turbo and 600ps. Again the dyno's computer (laptop) has the dyno

chart -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PVE_im5l-M

Also there's a white R32 GTS-T with series 2 front bumper

(Australia) that produced around I think was roughly

319rwkw? with stock motor and roughly 358rwkw? with a

strengthened motor, cams, etc at a dyno competition. It

had RB25 gearbox, etc.

Here's another RB20DET in a S14 that produced around

335rwkw (449.8rwhp) -

I'm not 100% sure but I think that S14 dyno run was done

in Australia.

Edited by SKYPER

I wonder what a custom twin turbo setup would be like....maybe slap a couple of R34 N1s on running 24psi or something....im getting 322awkw with R34 N1s on 20psi in my GTR, I know the rb26 is probably a fair bit more advanced in terms of head flow and setup to achieve that easily but surely with only .6 of a litre capacity less you could still see some pretty good power figures with good spool time instead of a big single child eating turbo.

What does everyone else think?

Cheers!

Gagz

Edited by R31 Gagz
Correct me if im wrong but thats the 9 second GTSt i mentioned in an earlier post?

really?

well its in my mates shed at the moment its the 405rwkw one I was talking about

I didnt know it ran 9's in Japan

Mac go go ftw

edit

ah nah sorry Roy your talking about Red Zone(think) off the hpi vids different car

hence Mac go go above (thats the shop)

Edited by 1400r
  • 14 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...