Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So SK. Assuming you had a regular 2.5L normal cams etc would you recommend the vg30 housing in order to get ~ 250rwkw.

Should the response still be ok? Putting your invested interest aside hahaha

What I'm wondering is if is worth downgrading to the R33 cover to increase response and still have close to 250rwkw. It's about 4-6 hours work taking the turbo off and on again though.

Nope, the high flowed RB25DET turbine housing will do 250 rwkw, givne decent tuning.

Personally I wouldn't use a VG30 turbine cover until I was aiming for 275 rwkw or more.

Why have the poorer throttle response when you don't have to?

Cheers

Gary

  • 2 weeks later...

Just swapped back to the smaller cover.

Quite a large improvement in boost response. Admittedly the comparison was on the untuned map for both turbos (so the difference may be reduced with a proper tune).

Its strange the r34 runs the larger cover. The r34 must spool a little later than the r33 (I guess stock they have the smaller lighter wheels so less noticeable)..

Much happier with it now though. I should have probably kept the vg30 cover in case I ever go 3L bottom end though :laugh::(

Edited by benl1981

Chris. It really transforms the car. I didn't enjoy driving it that much with the vg30 housing. Now it is just always there ready to start going.

Slightly laggier than stock turbo but not much.

Peak Boost probably made 300-500rpm lower but it is the ease with which it builds the boost that is important. You really had to sink your foot into it with the vg30 housing, now you can get 6psi+ without hardly any throttle input.

Unless your willing to spend money on cams, or cam gears or 3L etc I wouldn't recommend the vg30 cover. Will be a lot of tuning to get it close to the r33 housing response.

My car is 99% street driven so it is important to have the low end. It's never going to be a v8 but anywhere over 3000rpm is great now..

Edited by benl1981

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...