Shaun Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 Hi, Im just wondering if anyone has experienced a similar problem. Ive got a GT35r high mount turbo on an RB26, and i had the dumpipe and exhaust fabricated while the turbo had a 0.82ar turbine housing. Ive since had to change to a 1.06ar turbine housing and, while the turbo sits in exactly the same position, the exhaust now doesnt line up by a significant margin. I understand the housings are different, but i would have thought that they may have been interchangable without significant modification to the exhaust. The reason why im asking is that i also took my exhaust off, so im wondering whether its the new turbine housing or (incorrect) fitment of the exhaust. Has anyone had experience whith this problem? Thanks, Shaun. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
R31Nismoid Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 Isnt the turbine housing a bit longer? to makeup the 1.06? Not just wider... hrm. I cant remember when i had a .63 and .82 what the difference was side by side. If it is longer, then that would indeed push the whole setup back "X" amount and thus things wouldnt line up. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3553430 Share on other sites More sharing options...
axe s Posted December 27, 2007 Share Posted December 27, 2007 i think they are higher, y not just measure both, if u still have the old one. u could probably solve it by putting in a flex or 2 if the gap isn't excessive Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3553474 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTR1993 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 i swapped from the .82 GT30 to the 1.06 3540 with out any problems everything lined up exactly, but the exhaust isn't fitted correctly? Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3553562 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted December 28, 2007 Author Share Posted December 28, 2007 ^^^^^^ Thats what i wanted to know, thanks. It doesnt really make sense; the dump pipe is in exactly the same position as it was with the 0.82; if it was out even slightly it would foul on something because the tolerances in that part of the engine bay are so tight. Something else is going on but im buggered if i know what it is. There is only one way an exhaust can go on! Oh, i dont have the 0.82 anymore to compare. Shaun. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3554267 Share on other sites More sharing options...
R34GTFOUR Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 this might be a silly question but are they both external gate lol Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3554372 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirRacer Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 id love to hear the difference in responce shaun as im thinking of changing mine also Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3554451 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted December 29, 2007 Author Share Posted December 29, 2007 Theyre both external gate. Aparently the boost was uncontrollable with the 0.82 housing, hitting about 17 psi at about 2000 rpm. This was with a 9:1 compression ratio and 44mm external gate. Hopefully it'll be a little more relaxed with the 1.06 housing. Ive just gotta get that f**king exhaust modified first. Shaun. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3555337 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTR1993 Posted December 29, 2007 Share Posted December 29, 2007 17 psi at 2000 rpm, i dont think so. would be near double that. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3555395 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaun Posted December 29, 2007 Author Share Posted December 29, 2007 17 psi at 2000 rpm, i dont think so. would be near double that. Why dont you think so, mate? Thats why im going through this whole process. If it made 17psi at 4000rpm id be happy, and not be bothered changing to the 1.06. Besides, its an atypical engine set up. I dont know what your basis was for making that comment. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3555668 Share on other sites More sharing options...
STR8E180 Posted December 29, 2007 Share Posted December 29, 2007 i wondering why did u go from the .82 housing to a 1.06 housing? Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3555807 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTR1993 Posted December 29, 2007 Share Posted December 29, 2007 Why dont you think so, mate? Thats why im going through this whole process. If it made 17psi at 4000rpm id be happy, and not be bothered changing to the 1.06. Besides, its an atypical engine set up.I dont know what your basis was for making that comment. Oh just seems alot faster then anyone else is getting, i wish my setup would perform like this! Id be very happy. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199296-garrett-gt35-turbine-housing-question/#findComment-3555812 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now