Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Got my s13 - rb25det dyno'ed yesterday. 401.9HK / 528 Nm @ wheels

have only begun to play with the ignition, AFR are still a little rich.

Turbo is a GT3076r. 0.82 exh trim. @ ~1.25 bar boost.

what could the dip in power up top be??

Its a std rb25det bottom end, head is ported and overhauled otherwise std.

Using oct 95 fuel

post-24535-1198921745_thumb.jpg

Edited by nissan200sx.dk
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/199482-my-first-dynorun/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what could the dip in power up top be??

Rough guess, I'd say the ignition curve could be cranked up (advanced) in that area - dependent on knock.

It looks like your results are similar to The Mafia and Lithium who also run GT3076 on RB25, though I'd like to compare the shape of the curves. Given your AFR might be a little rich, you might find a good bit of extra power there for the taking with extra time tuning. What sort of ECU did you choose?

Did you go with internal gate, or external? I take it that the top graph is boost, in bar (absolute)? The line from 4000rpm is a bit up/down. Maybe your boost controller needs a little adjustment to smooth that out too?

WHY WERE U USING 95RON FUEL!?!?!?!?

There was no indicator of the standard of measurement. Could be RON, MON, or (RON+MON)/2.

Indicators are that he is still working on the tune, and the fuel may not be the limiting factor that you think. It may be that the only requirement to making more grunt is give it more timing.

Let's see what he comes back with.

Hi all.

Thanks for replys.

I am using a apexi FC hooked up with my fc box that is hooked up with a LM1 that is hooked up to my labtop. hehe.

oct 98 is only availible a few places here, want to adjust it to using 95. I will be using methanol injection later on, so the 3 in difference wont do that much.

its with external wastegate. a no name... Could a electronic boost controller help with a little earlier boost?? it comes on a little slow.

Up top my ignition are ~20 mark. Am still learning, so aint so fast to get it sorted all in once.

AF values are around low 10.

Hk is almost the same as BHP. 1kw = 1.34HK

Have an idea to hook up the methanol injector. If I use the signal to one of the injectors, hooked it up to a solid state relay, they are REALLY fast, and can handle 10A, the one im looking at. That relay would then drive the methanol injecter. I am looking at this to get a liniar injection on the methanol.... it will follow the duty cycle of the regular injectors.

Any thought on this?

hey mate, I'm still grabbing that ignition map for you too.

Also, you say your AFR's are 10:1 - that is WAY TOO LOW.

Move them to 11.7:1 or even 12:1.

10:1 and my car wouldn'r run properly. It backfired and hesitated on acceleration. Its absolutely way too rich.

Hi mafia

thanks heaps! :D

I do use the std coils, and have had problem with the spark... could the dip be caused by bad coils?

Also the mixture is still way rich as you say, will get that sorted. I do get some backfire sometimes up top..

It seems unlikely to be coils, as it is occurring after peak torque, however if the ignition timing is slightly retarded, it increases the load on the coils, as the combustion pressure at plug firing is higher. You will usually find that once the engine has gone past peak torque you can start to add some timing back in as the volumetric efficiency is dropping off. If you can put up a graph of the ignition timing with a plot of the cells it goes through on a power run it would be great.

Edited by Adriano
maybe they don't have 98ron where he is?

LMFAO.

do u live in nambour?

drive the extra 5min to a servo that has the fuel.

your an idiot.

- high performance engine + mods= i will have a side dish of detonation with my f**ked tune please

-wtf-

make sure you under stand what you are reading as well with regards to octane it varies in different countries, in australia we use the RON only on the pump to advertise the fuel.

but in alot of european, canadian and the united states, they advertise the AKI or PON number which is RON+MON/2, so if someone in the us has 91 octane fuel as they will say, its equivalent to over 96 RON here is aust.

LMFAO.

do u live in nambour?

drive the extra 5min to a servo that has the fuel.

your an idiot.

- high performance engine + mods= i will have a side dish of detonation with my f**ked tune please

-wtf-

hey, retard, before shooting your mouth off, why don't you look into where the thread starter is actually located? DENMARK.

How about you f*ck off out of this thread, and don't come back?

Edited by The Mafia

Do a skid... :D

And if he's tuning it, on that fuel, it won't detonate...

That's the whole point of doing it.

But, without a retune, there's zero advantage of putting in 98 fuel either...

Hence why it's a placebo when you throw 98 in your excel.

Have an idea to hook up the methanol injector. If I use the signal to one of the injectors, hooked it up to a solid state relay, they are REALLY fast, and can handle 10A, the one im looking at. That relay would then drive the methanol injecter. I am looking at this to get a liniar injection on the methanol.... it will follow the duty cycle of the regular injectors.

Any thought on this?

Adriano:

Will get the AF spot on before i'll add the methanol. But 12.8:1??? Its not 100% methanol.. Only about 5 - 10 % that will be methanol, so can I still use such "lean" AF when I add the methanol?

R33cruiser:

Ehm... Its 30min drive for me to get 98... I only know of 4 places I can get it. A few years back there were alot of places. Dunno why, buts its being removed from market here. We have bio 95... There is a little ethanol in it. I think. And my tune has to be on 95! As its easy to get, and will have the methanol to help with det. Right now I'm still learning to adjust and understand my engine. Have made ALL mods on my car myself, and this is my first car, and have never before messed aruond with cars before this. I know 98 is better, but Im using my car everyday.. So when I tune and deside which fuel I use, that has to be in my consideration. I'll use it everyday.

RB30-power.

Have NO idea which rating the oct 95 is...

Mafia.

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...