Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

give him time... I mean, its not everyday you see F1 drivers flipping others the bird on a track

Back in the day, before the bird was invented the universal signal for "up yours" was infact something that looked pretty similar to a thumbs up signal. Last time I was it used was by Jim Richards at Bathurst.

and who's to say schuey didn't just stuff up and stall his car there? I think he was judged on past actions.

He's a victim of his own success...'Too good to make a mistake'

bet you don't remember anything else about that monaco race.

even IF it was deliberate, professional fouls occur in every other sport. I don't really see the difference, except with how much media hype surrounded that incident. professional sportsmen take every competitive advantage they can, and always try to stretch the envelope of the rules or what is considered acceptable. that was certainly the culture at Ferrari - you don't dominate the best part of a decade in F1 without stepping on a few toes. perhaps if <<insert your favourite driver here>> had been up the pointy end for half as long as Michael, they'd have had a momentary brain fade here or there along the way also.

strange perspective though - deliberately causing a crash at racing speed is not as bad??? maybe Schumacher should have slowed and waited for the potentially faster qualifying car and just ploughed into him deliberately and to hell with the consequences - then you wouldn't mind it so much eh? personally, I reckon you'd be screaming "attempted murder" along with the world's press. the power of a surname. or the way the media casts you...

Not to mention that the oh so innocent McLaren drivers were no more than 3 weeks ago handed 5 position penalties for holding up cars in qualifying...So they didn't stop on the track...So they escape the flaming because they were slightly more creative?

The other escapes me

Might not be the 1 you're trying to remember, but Hamilton signalling to Fisi in what is pretty much 'what the f**k' in most wog hand speech, when racing for position, made me sick.

and who's to say schuey didn't just stuff up and stall his car there?

well have a look at the footage again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcRUM2w2CVY

when you look at the 'speed' involved, and how he's steering the car; there really couldn't be any doubt that he meant to do it

well have a look at the footage again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcRUM2w2CVY

when you look at the 'speed' involved, and how he's steering the car; there really couldn't be any doubt that he meant to do it

I never understood that incident, why did he slow down and steered like? It's not like you can escape the consequences because everything is recorded. It was the strangest incident I've ever seen.

Just for those that blamed Alonso...

Front wing failure likely cause of Hamilton-Alonso crash

McLaren have confirmed that Lewis Hamilton’s front wing broke immediately prior to his running into the rear of Fernando Alonso’s Renault on lap two of Sunday’s Bahrain Grand Prix.

The unusual nature of the accident - both drivers were accelerating on a straight section of track - prompted cynics to question whether Alonso had ‘brake tested’ his former team mate. Renault’s telemetry suggested otherwise, and McLaren say they have no suspicion of any wrongdoing on the part of the Spaniard.

“When I went into the engineers’ room and started looking at the details that I realised Lewis’s upper front wing had disappeared about two seconds before the accident, so he suddenly lost downforce,” explained McLaren’s Formula One CEO, Martin Whitmarsh.

“We haven’t analysed why that happened but we suspect the structure had been weakened by previous contact. To be fair to Lewis it could have broken of its own accord, but that has never happened before so contact is the most likely cause. There’s certainly no evidence that Fernando did anything wrong.”

Such a failure would have robbed Hamilton’s car of not only downforce, but also drag, giving it an unexpected burst of acceleration, explaining the unlikely impact.

www.formula1.com

He was on fire when i met him and loving it. he was different then. Then as soon as Lewis arrived he started showing the world how immature he is and how good he is at chucking his toys out of the pram and getting absolutely slammed by a rookie.

Ive lost a lot of respect for the young guy and i dont rate him as highly as i did a couple of years back.

Well talking to a McLaren mechanic in Melbourne, Alonso was liked by his mechanics, and Alonso was only guilty of letting some things be heard outside the team. Lewis is loved by the team, but was not innocent. At the end of the day Alonso is gone and i have it on good authority that Lewis was no more innocent then Alonso, only Alonso lost out in the eyes of the media.....I didnt get any insight on why that was the case but one could hazard a guess and say that so much F1 media is British, and secondly that he was the golden rookie...but was clever enough to cry foul publically but behind close doors conduct business in a different manner.

Re todays press release, McLaren are doing a good job of protecting their drivers. Perhaps Flavio needs to take a leaf out of their book. Every time there is a problem its a team letting the driver down.

It's bullshit.

I've watched the accident numerous times and Hamilton got a run on Alonso out of turn 1, Alonso took the inside line into turn 2 to cover where as Hamilton kept out wide keeping a higher speed and then simply had too much speed on the exit of 3 (before they were even driving in a straight line).

If Hamilton's wing was damaged/broken he would have run wide on that corner due to lack of downforce and hit Alonso's left rear not tried to go up the inside of him (right side).

Edited by benm
anyone have footage of the wing breaking 2 seconds prior?

sounds like spin to calm things down.

Re Lewis farking up by trying to start the race in the wrong mode...

He has admitted that he forgot to push the correct button…?

"Yes, but as a team Vodafone McLaren Mercedes doesn’t habitually blame its drivers in public. Is the procedure clear? Is it simple enough? We have to look at all the details."

LOL, the story of the front spoiler? I suppose they could see the stroke of the front shock change indicating loss of downforce on the front...but i suspect its another example of the team protecting the driver. Just like it was the teams fault not to call Lewis in when at China he had fark all grip, they could see the tyre was farked....no doubt Lewis said the car was still drivable, wait to see what the weather was doing...and oops! Fark Up! But the team wore that mistake ! :)

well have a look at the footage again

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcRUM2w2CVY

when you look at the 'speed' involved, and how he's steering the car; there really couldn't be any doubt that he meant to do it

Wow, thats the first time ive seen it from that angle and i have no doubt he sawed at the wheel twice even though he was clear of the corner.

Im of the definite opinion it was deliberate. He induced a touch of over steer, made slight correction which you can see from the slight puff of smoke from the tyres but over compensated which put him clear of the corner so then he had to change his line through the corner and straightened up there by appearing to have run out of road.

It was an amateurish cheating attempt. If he got it right on the first turn of the wheel it would have been impossible to tell but in actual fact he screwed up...

And was penalized for it.

Oh well...he still has 7 championships under his belt and i think ill be in the grave before that ever happens again!

And here come the critics .... http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news...409105054.shtml

I agree 1000% that Louises gesturing when he couldnt get past Fisi was uncalled for and a bit childish/bratish.

Be interesting to see that if McLaren continue to struggle and lost their place at the top with Ferrari whether the Alonso fans will come out of the woodwork saying "We told you so" If Lewis can turn it around in the next few GPs and get solid podiums then it will at least show that mentally is tough enough to be around for a whole championship when expectation is high

With regards to signing Alonso for RBR in 2008, the 63-year-old Dietrich Mateschitz is quoted as saying

"His situation was complicated because he was free for one year only,"

Whilst looking for a 2008 drive it seems Alonso had already wrapped up a seat for 2009. Everbody seems to thinks its Ferrari, but personally i can see it being BMW. For a period they were very vocal with their praise for Alonso, but the past 9 months have gone quiet. I think they have bagged him with Heidfled out of a seat in 2009. What is Nick the Bricks contract term?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 49719 is the cooler loop. Right at the front, LHS of that diagram. Return line from rack (LP side) goes to cooler loop on RHS front of car, then back under engine and returns to bottom of tank. 49717M is feed from tank to pump. HP line out of pump is thick rubber, followed by the hard line that runs down to crossmember and runs in parallel (but opposite flow direction) to the LP return line. Nothing goes anywhere near the firewall or interior of car. The closest they get to that is the connections on the rack.
    • Thanks, plan is to drain all fluid tomorrow and do smoke test to find out the leak.   Appreciate your help and want to understand how the system work. So cooling is achieved by the long loop not any rad? The diagram seems to suggest it connects to somewhere inside the cabin and I thought that is a cooler inside firewall. If you look at the diagram it seems to show it connects to something inside firewall. I tried chasing it but not easy unless I take loads off   i am confident pump is good as fluid goes in and it gets soft( steering) but as soon as I turn engine off , loads of bubble come to surface and overflow. When engine is on , fluid level is below minimum but when off it shoots off and thinking it is sucking air in. I suspect aluminium pipe may have a crack line or whole   smoke test with no fluid should be a good start and if needed will remove the pump   In addition, the one going under the engine bay is high pressure line and one directly connecting from pump to resorvoir is return/ low pressure?   finally I searched and suggestion is to use dexron 2 but that is discontinued so bought dexron 3 as all research suggest it is compatible and shouldn’t cause any issues/ blow seals. I bought two liter of dexron 3 motul atf
    • Don't worry about. Just don't try to drive hard enough to make boost and you'll be fine.
    • Yes. This has already been said. It is a loop of hardline in front of the radiator. Because.... the pump is on the LHS and the steering rack hydraulic connections are where they always are on a RHD steering rack....on the RHS. The high pressure line goes down under the engine, along the crossmember, like it does on all Skylines. Don't just throw expensive braided hoses/other kits at it. Work out what is wrong and fix that.
    • Still got the afm on the intake, clamps are shut tight, only loose hose is the one that goes from the j pipe towards the IACV, since it's next to impossible to find a factory hose and the barbs are different sizes (I'm still using clamps on this hose to try and help it seal on the iacv side) I've ordered parts to make up the hotside of the intercooler pipes, I'll plumb it in and see what happens in a few days I suppose The turbo's internally gated, can I just unscrew the tension rod to let the gate open?
×
×
  • Create New...