Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ah Brisby...You save so much of my time with your posts :thumbsup:

Racing 750hp, 600kg cars in the wet is downright dangerous. It's called motor sport princess.

Yeah, If Raikkonen pulled in behind Kubica, your mate Hamilton more than likely would've taken them both out. If he can't see 2 flashing red lights and 2 cars PARKED side by side waiting for them to go green, what chance does he have of seeing 2 flashing red lights and the rear end of only 1 car parked in front of him...

Alright, while you and Roy get your jiggie on,

I never said racing wasnt dangerous. Raikkonnen the WDC was.

Cold tyres, out of a dry tunnel and onto a damp track and Wham, two cars taken out - at what he admited to being 200mph.

Brain fade from both drivers as far as i can tell.

Or dont you think so, "princess"?

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Was also over the crest that caused Coulthard to lose it the day before....Maybe they should've penalized DC for endangering his own life...

A driver putting himself at risk and a driver involving an innocent are two completely different things.

A driver putting himself at risk and a driver involving an innocent are two completely different things.

You have got to be kidding me. Well, you're kidding yourself.

ITS A RACE!

What don't you understand? Should every driver that crashes be penalised for endangering the lives of drivers, spectators and marshalls?

Stop trying to argue something that is making you look foolish.

You have got to be kidding me. Well, you're kidding yourself.

ITS A RACE!

What don't you understand? Should every driver that crashes be penalised for endangering the lives of drivers, spectators and marshalls?

Stop trying to argue something that is making you look foolish.

Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

Oh my, someones losing any/all credibility...

The pit lane exit was closed and the safety car was on track.

There are rules that need to be followed when racing. Kubica, Raikkonen (both in Monaco and Canada) and Coulthard (Monaco) obeyed them.

Actually,

You know what. I just looked at the incident again and i cant believe how dumb that make Hamfist look.

Such a stupid error... probably the dumbest of the year.

I dont know how he couldnt see the red light... Ironically, it went green a split second after Hammo took out KR...

and Kube was like "Yoink - ill take that win thank you very much."

From what I know (and it aint much), pit lane isn't considered part of the track.

And look, if the muppet can't see the cars, the lights and can't hear his boss telling him to take care then.....well.....can't say much more really.

Hamilton.......massive fail!

Oh my, someones losing any/all credibility...

The pit lane exit was closed and the safety car was on track.

There are rules that need to be followed when racing. Kubica, Raikkonen (both in Monaco and Canada) and Coulthard (Monaco) obeyed them.

Dude chillax on the "Ive got to make my point and have the final say".

Credibility is overrated especially when we are armchair expert keyboard sunday warriors, lol

I was commenting on your "Its a race" comment.

No doubt it was a stupid error but i still think KR should have been penalised for his brain fade in Monaco because thats EXACTLY what it was to me.

A brain fade - either that or the "red mist" descended... equally as bad.

Frustrated with life because you cant get past a F.I much?

Monty at Montreal in 2005 anyone?

Edited by m3gtr

Actually, while we are at it, lets penalize all the groundhogs that appear at Montreal - those lil bastards

'specially the one that robbed Ant last year.

Edited by m3gtr
Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

No difference at all. In both instances you race to within the rules. On the track you obey the flags, in the pits you obey the lights, pit speed etc. He didnt heed the red lights. Just like if he overtook Kubica whilst there was a safety car on the track. Or hit him whilst behind the safety car. You can do it, the fact that he hit another car when not stopping for the red light is the stooopid part of it.

And again for those crying FIA foul. What happened to Vettel when he rocked up to China last year? He copped a 10 place penalty. But wait, guess what? It was overturned when evidence came to light that Lewis's frequent baulking behind the pace car was a controbuting factor so was let off. LOL, so they let off Vettel because Lewis was partly to blame. They didnt can him then, which woudl have been a tough call. This time round its perfectly fair that he cops the penalty, its warranted

yer, It was a move warranting a penalty but i cant believe how many people on here are defending KR and saying his move didnt!!

Thats biased.

I just want to also say that Massas move on HK and RB at the hairpin was stupidly wicked.

Edited by m3gtr
No doubt it was a stupid error but i still think KR should have been penalised for his brain fade in Monaco because thats EXACTLY what it was to me.

A brain fade - either that or the "red mist" descended... equally as bad.

But how many races has DC won? He isnt a hack. He is past his best, but he is still very talented guy, so when all by himself, in the dry he binned his car on the same corner. So fast forward 24 hours and in a wet race in traffic on tyres that are still comign up to temperature, he made a woopsie and hit another competitor. He went and saw Sutil after the race and apolgised. The way i see it he did a marvelous job of controlling it. He could have very easily made an even bigger mess of it and had the race red flagged.

Anyway, all this is taking away from a hige effort by BMW and Kubica. But the real story is how selfless Nicj Heidfeld was. If he raced his team mate like any other competitor it would have been his race because he had the right strategy at the right time, LOL and didnt need to hti a wall to fluke onto the right strategy :thumbsup:

yer, It was a move warranting a penalty but i cant believe how many people on here are defending KR and saying his move didnt!!

Thats biased.

WHAT MOVE?

He locked up the brakes, and spun out at the fastest part of the circuit. How is that a move? How can you even begin to imagine that being penalized?

How can you say something so ridiculous, whilst in the same sentence call anyone biased?

WHAT MOVE?

He locked up the brakes, and spun out at the fastest part of the circuit. How is that a move? How can you even begin to imagine that being penalized?

How can you say something so ridiculous, whilst in the same sentence call anyone biased?

I was supposed to type "mistake"

Chill out Dezz - Its not the end of the world.

Edited by m3gtr

Cracker of a race though, pity Webber wasn't up there. Makes me wonder if he didn't bin it at the end of Q2, probably wouldn't have been in all the traffic as he was showing some pace, but ohwell.

Massa's beginning to prove a few people wrong, had quite a few passes and in trying conditions, is good to see.

Edited by salad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...