Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ah Brisby...You save so much of my time with your posts :thumbsup:

Racing 750hp, 600kg cars in the wet is downright dangerous. It's called motor sport princess.

Yeah, If Raikkonen pulled in behind Kubica, your mate Hamilton more than likely would've taken them both out. If he can't see 2 flashing red lights and 2 cars PARKED side by side waiting for them to go green, what chance does he have of seeing 2 flashing red lights and the rear end of only 1 car parked in front of him...

Alright, while you and Roy get your jiggie on,

I never said racing wasnt dangerous. Raikkonnen the WDC was.

Cold tyres, out of a dry tunnel and onto a damp track and Wham, two cars taken out - at what he admited to being 200mph.

Brain fade from both drivers as far as i can tell.

Or dont you think so, "princess"?

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Was also over the crest that caused Coulthard to lose it the day before....Maybe they should've penalized DC for endangering his own life...

A driver putting himself at risk and a driver involving an innocent are two completely different things.

A driver putting himself at risk and a driver involving an innocent are two completely different things.

You have got to be kidding me. Well, you're kidding yourself.

ITS A RACE!

What don't you understand? Should every driver that crashes be penalised for endangering the lives of drivers, spectators and marshalls?

Stop trying to argue something that is making you look foolish.

You have got to be kidding me. Well, you're kidding yourself.

ITS A RACE!

What don't you understand? Should every driver that crashes be penalised for endangering the lives of drivers, spectators and marshalls?

Stop trying to argue something that is making you look foolish.

Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

Oh my, someones losing any/all credibility...

The pit lane exit was closed and the safety car was on track.

There are rules that need to be followed when racing. Kubica, Raikkonen (both in Monaco and Canada) and Coulthard (Monaco) obeyed them.

Actually,

You know what. I just looked at the incident again and i cant believe how dumb that make Hamfist look.

Such a stupid error... probably the dumbest of the year.

I dont know how he couldnt see the red light... Ironically, it went green a split second after Hammo took out KR...

and Kube was like "Yoink - ill take that win thank you very much."

From what I know (and it aint much), pit lane isn't considered part of the track.

And look, if the muppet can't see the cars, the lights and can't hear his boss telling him to take care then.....well.....can't say much more really.

Hamilton.......massive fail!

Oh my, someones losing any/all credibility...

The pit lane exit was closed and the safety car was on track.

There are rules that need to be followed when racing. Kubica, Raikkonen (both in Monaco and Canada) and Coulthard (Monaco) obeyed them.

Dude chillax on the "Ive got to make my point and have the final say".

Credibility is overrated especially when we are armchair expert keyboard sunday warriors, lol

I was commenting on your "Its a race" comment.

No doubt it was a stupid error but i still think KR should have been penalised for his brain fade in Monaco because thats EXACTLY what it was to me.

A brain fade - either that or the "red mist" descended... equally as bad.

Frustrated with life because you cant get past a F.I much?

Monty at Montreal in 2005 anyone?

Edited by m3gtr

Actually, while we are at it, lets penalize all the groundhogs that appear at Montreal - those lil bastards

'specially the one that robbed Ant last year.

Edited by m3gtr
Wait a minute.

Lets take your argument. So its a race. What difference does it make then if it happened in the pitlane or out on the track?

No difference at all. In both instances you race to within the rules. On the track you obey the flags, in the pits you obey the lights, pit speed etc. He didnt heed the red lights. Just like if he overtook Kubica whilst there was a safety car on the track. Or hit him whilst behind the safety car. You can do it, the fact that he hit another car when not stopping for the red light is the stooopid part of it.

And again for those crying FIA foul. What happened to Vettel when he rocked up to China last year? He copped a 10 place penalty. But wait, guess what? It was overturned when evidence came to light that Lewis's frequent baulking behind the pace car was a controbuting factor so was let off. LOL, so they let off Vettel because Lewis was partly to blame. They didnt can him then, which woudl have been a tough call. This time round its perfectly fair that he cops the penalty, its warranted

yer, It was a move warranting a penalty but i cant believe how many people on here are defending KR and saying his move didnt!!

Thats biased.

I just want to also say that Massas move on HK and RB at the hairpin was stupidly wicked.

Edited by m3gtr
No doubt it was a stupid error but i still think KR should have been penalised for his brain fade in Monaco because thats EXACTLY what it was to me.

A brain fade - either that or the "red mist" descended... equally as bad.

But how many races has DC won? He isnt a hack. He is past his best, but he is still very talented guy, so when all by himself, in the dry he binned his car on the same corner. So fast forward 24 hours and in a wet race in traffic on tyres that are still comign up to temperature, he made a woopsie and hit another competitor. He went and saw Sutil after the race and apolgised. The way i see it he did a marvelous job of controlling it. He could have very easily made an even bigger mess of it and had the race red flagged.

Anyway, all this is taking away from a hige effort by BMW and Kubica. But the real story is how selfless Nicj Heidfeld was. If he raced his team mate like any other competitor it would have been his race because he had the right strategy at the right time, LOL and didnt need to hti a wall to fluke onto the right strategy :thumbsup:

yer, It was a move warranting a penalty but i cant believe how many people on here are defending KR and saying his move didnt!!

Thats biased.

WHAT MOVE?

He locked up the brakes, and spun out at the fastest part of the circuit. How is that a move? How can you even begin to imagine that being penalized?

How can you say something so ridiculous, whilst in the same sentence call anyone biased?

WHAT MOVE?

He locked up the brakes, and spun out at the fastest part of the circuit. How is that a move? How can you even begin to imagine that being penalized?

How can you say something so ridiculous, whilst in the same sentence call anyone biased?

I was supposed to type "mistake"

Chill out Dezz - Its not the end of the world.

Edited by m3gtr

Cracker of a race though, pity Webber wasn't up there. Makes me wonder if he didn't bin it at the end of Q2, probably wouldn't have been in all the traffic as he was showing some pace, but ohwell.

Massa's beginning to prove a few people wrong, had quite a few passes and in trying conditions, is good to see.

Edited by salad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...