Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have a 96 R33 gts-t and was wondering how to get the best fuel economy out of it. Alot of threads have discussed things to improve fuel economy but not many about how to drive the car to achieve this. My car is fairly stock with only an aftermarket exhaust, pod and a boost gauge. I was wondering if it is better to be in a higher gear with lower revs and be on say 2psi now and then or use the engine's power without the assistance of the turbo and rev higher in each gear and not really pass the 0 PSI mark? Also is it possible to have a DSBC on less than the standard boost, Say 1 or 2 PSI and basically eliminate the turbo for daily driving? Then just shoot back to full use of it when needed? Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Cheers Jason

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/200409-turboboost-fuel-economy/
Share on other sites

Cant run less than actuator boost, 7 psi, i have found for best economy, rev out each gear a little bit, but dont load the motor, as this allow reasonable acceleration whilst staying in closed loop. Also try to roll on the accelerator gently,as this reduces the accel pump function.

Ah ok, so rather Rev it in a lower gear rather than use boost. Would fuel economy plummit if i were to use 3/4 or full boost say in 5th gear and only at 2k? Is this supplying more air pressure/ fuel than the car is using? Cheers

Fuel economy is controlled by the right foot.

Cruise around and accelerate with light load, 3000rpm (or less) gear changes.

Dont load the motor up either, if its ! 1500rpm and you wanna accel, down gear one/two and use the gearing rather than boost... again light accelerator

Its really just the same as any other car in the world.

Gotta go easy if you want economy... but if your worried about fuel, then you shouldn't have purchased a skyline :D

Fuel economy is controlled by the right foot.

Cruise around and accelerate with light load, 3000rpm (or less) gear changes.

Dont load the motor up either, if its ! 1500rpm and you wanna accel, down gear one/two and use the gearing rather than boost... again light accelerator

Its really just the same as any other car in the world.

Gotta go easy if you want economy... but if your worried about fuel, then you shouldn't have purchased a skyline :woot:

Haha thanks for that , now have a better understanding...But when it comes down to it, fuel consumption is a small price to pay for a quality performance :D

On an R33 you can cut back to 3PSi as this is actuator pressure.

The standard setup though, has a bleed solenoid to bleed to 7PSi.

An EBC can allow you to do this by turning the EBC off and on as wanted.

Basically, use the revs, but don't boost.

Once you hit boost, it just chucks fuel in to richen it right up.

Actually, for an N/A car, full throttle shifting at lower rpm as opposed to light throttle and revving it higher is better for gas. The opposite is true for turbo cars since load changes how much power (fuel) you use at a certain RPM.

On an R33 you can cut back to 3PSi as this is actuator pressure.

The standard setup though, has a bleed solenoid to bleed to 7PSi.

An EBC can allow you to do this by turning the EBC off and on as wanted.

Basically, use the revs, but don't boost.

Once you hit boost, it just chucks fuel in to richen it right up.

So your saying that if you fit and ebc, like an avcr and turn it off that it will only run 3psi??

I find this hard to believe since i am running like this atm and it goes to 7psi.

So your saying that if you fit and ebc, like an avcr and turn it off that it will only run 3psi??

I find this hard to believe since i am running like this atm and it goes to 7psi.

I don't.

Waste gate is only a 3PSi spring.

Your waste gate may be different.

Seriously, on the standard setup, turbo = boosted by 2800RPM, to 3PSi steady, at 4500RPM, it cuts upto 7PSi, how do you explain that?

boost is at 5psi untill 45000rpms then 7psi.
Might wanna get that checked...

Every tech article I've read claims 3PSi.

I'll pull my boost controller out tomorrow and run it up and see what it hits... I need to do this anyway, as I need to go back to waste gate pressure before destroying th eengine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...