Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

jack3d pre-workout - though easing up on this lately it doesn't seem to have anywhere near the same effect it did the first/second months of usage. and i hate the taste.

I remember my first time I tried Jack3d, was scratching at my skin like a crack addict because my skin was tingling and got the jitters lol.

Just out of interest, how far over do you bend for barbell rows? Go for this imo, I love them:

Pretty much try to get parallel with the floor, I see people doing them at 45 all the time and they are sorta missing the point lol

jack3d pre-workout - though easing up on this lately it doesn't seem to have anywhere near the same effect it did the first/second months of usage. and i hate the taste.

I find if i take a break from it for a couple of weeks it is much more powerful rather than taking it before every workout. Definitely on the hunt for a new pre-workout though and have heard good things about 1MR, anyone have any feedback on it?

they're intended to be done parallel to the floor but that doesn't mean you can't vary it from time to time and do it at a 45掳 angle... it just hits higher up your back instead of the lats etc... just like changing from a pronated grip to supinated will vary it as well

best when held at the top a little, really squeezing your shoulder blades together

I find if i take a break from it for a couple of weeks it is much more powerful rather than taking it before every workout. Definitely on the hunt for a new pre-workout though and have heard good things about 1MR, anyone have any feedback on it?

I use 1MR from time to time and it works pretty good for me. Taste good, doesn't have 1,3 Dimeth like Jack3d which I've read causes some bad side effects.

Righto been doin a fair bit of thinking and reading and I've decided to change up the routine a bit

OLD ROUTINE

Monday

Chest/tris

Tuesday

Legs/abs

Wednesday

Upper back/bis

Thursday

Shoulders/abs

Friday

Deadlift session

NEW ROUTINE

Monday

Chest/tris

Tuesday

Legs/shoulders

Wednesday

Upper back/bis

Then repeat though on the second cycle I'll do a deadlift session..

So I'll be doing each muscle group twice a week though the amont of time spent on each muscle group in each session has been reduced

Essentially Shorter sessions more often stop needless over training and allow 3-4 days rest before getting back into it as appose to 5-6

I will still be doing the major exercises in both sessions though I'll will vary it so it's different ie

Chest

Day 1 barbell presses

Day 2 dumbbell presses

Back

Day 1 bentover barbell rows

Day 2 bent over t bar rows

I've also come to the conclusion that while Im tryin to bulk up my abs are goin to show up much anyway do I've cut the ab shit away

What do u guys reckon?

Appreciate input

Cheers

Righto scrap this, after some further research I'll be changing the routine again

Main changes will be:

Max 3 days of straight training then have a rest day

Changing to chest/bis and upperback/tris

Splitimg the routine so a secondary muscle that has been used in a work out gets at least 48 rest before being hit as a primary ie 48hours between a chest and shoulder session

Also will be goin by feel for when I start the training cycle again as appose to 1 cycle each week

Edited by GTR_JOEY

Ever considered a two day split repeated in the week? It's a lot of exercises to fit into two days, but three days off gives you some nice rest or cardio days.

I use 1MR from time to time and it works pretty good for me. Taste good, doesn't have 1,3 Dimeth like Jack3d which I've read causes some bad side effects.

It used to have it. I suppose without it, it's nothing more than a shitload of caffeine

Ever considered a two day split repeated in the week? It's a lot of exercises to fit into two days, but three days off gives you some nice rest or cardio days.

I have but my sessions would go for far too long and I just don't think I could have that many days off a week away from the gym...

Been doing a fair bit of reading and according to more then a couple of articles the best way for training to build bulk and muscle is to train once a week on each muscle group and really give them a smashing as appose to twice a week with less sets.

They also say that twice a week with less sets it's better for beginners while once a week with more sets is for more experienced body builders

They have their theories for saying this I can find the articles if anyone wants to read them

I agree with them that hitting each group once a week properly (as in, hard and heavy) is better than doing it twice a week with less sets. Without even seeing the theories behind it, I'd have my own about the muscles being broken down better by the former.

Number of sets does need to be defined though, because, for example, I do the two day split with a repeat later in the week, however, each exercise I do has about 6 sets to it and I certainly don't leave feeling like I could have done a lot more. It's sort of that...once a week thing...but repeated? Could be considered overtraining, but I heal pretty quickly and rarely feel like the workouts interfere with each other. I mean there's nothing I could do at the gym, short of causing myself a joint injury lol, that would require a week before I could safely work the muscle group again.

Na haven't heard of under tension mate....? I generally aim for 1 and a half minutes between sets, though I'm pretty social at the gym so doesn't always happen like that lol

In reguards to amont of sets for each muscle group, the general belief for once a week would be around 16 sets

For twice a week approx 8 sets

I agree that once a week is plenty of time to rest a muscle group after a hard session 4-5 days would be optimum in my opinion

I do the same workout on Thursday as I do on Monday, and Friday as I do on Tuesday. Even though it's a split routine, there's a small amount of crossover with muscle groups so Wednesday is the day of no gym = a thorough rest day. The only time I'll feel any sort of soreness or interference is if I miss a couple of days at the gym and then the next workout will take a little longer to recover from.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...