Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're right, but my mate tells me that he is barely adding any effort, so I am almost there..

you're still not understanding what I meant.

lets say you were on your 3rd set, and you did your 4th rep.

went down for the 5th, pressed and got half way up and couldn't get it any further, and the bar started to go downwards to crush you, your spotter should grab and lift it up, then rack it.

Saying he is not helping much and making you do another 3 past your sticking point is obviously not making you stronger or bigger because you've had the same issue for the past 6 weeks as you have said yourself.

The definition of Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

I am up to 40kg military press behind the head, again 3 sets of 8.

sitting or standing

if sitting, with back support or without?

Dips I have only started doing recently, but I put 20kg in my lap otherwise I find them too easy.

When I said DIPS, I meant

arnoldtricep.jpg

Not

ouch1.gif

Edited by TTT

you're still not understanding what I meant.

lets say you were on your 3rd set, and you did your 4th rep.

went down for the 5th, pressed and got half way up and couldn't get it any further, and the bar started to go downwards to crush you, your spotter should grab and lift it up, then rack it.

Saying he is not helping much and making you do another 3 past your sticking point is obviously not making you stronger or bigger because you've had the same issue for the past 6 weeks as you have said yourself.

The definition of Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

sitting or standing

if sitting, with back support or without?

When I said DIPS, I meant

Not

Dude I know what you meant.. the spotter shouldn't be there to help me get the rest of the set out, and I know that. It's not 'insane' to work at something and hope it will improve, that's the nature of what we are all doing lifting weights. Unfortunately I have hit a plateau, so that's why I've been asking for advice on what to change.

I do them standing, without support.

Yeh, I do dips like the second picture. I don't have a proper dip station at home yet.

Pretty sure you have to lift it, average ~151kg per lift. Example could be 180kg deadlift / 160kg squat / 115kg bench.

Obviously going to favour those with strong and short legs (squat must be parallel or below, deadlift must be from ground and locked in, bench unassisted and touch the chest etc). Also a bit biased, given two leg / lower back exercises and only one chest / upper body.

I'm not a huge fan of 1RMs, have never attempted them for a few reasons, but I'm kind of intrigued by a measurement of overall body strength by combining the three big lifts. It at least seems a bit more extensive than just claiming individual 1RMs. Might have to give it a go to see where I sit for interest's sake.

Thanks for the calculator, that's pretty interesting in itself.

Dezz I believe it's supposed to be 1000lb, so 151kg = 332.2lb x 3 = ~1000.

Never really tried 1RMs myself. Don't often train with a spotter (which I would consider essential if doing an actual 1RM) so I wouldn't know for sure.

I have done 110kg BP using a smith (current gym has no free BP... yeah, I know) for a couple of reps; 180kg DL (3 sets of 5 reps); and 130kg squat for 5 reps. That would equate to 242 + 396 + 286 = 924, and that's not 1RMs. While I'm reasonably happy with those numbers (for me), I don't think that's all that impressive to be honest, so a "1,000 club" doesn't sound all that impressive to me at all, given there would be heaps of guys at my gym that'd smash my numbers and mine aren't even 1RMs. When you mentioned it Birds that is the first time I'd heard of it. It is an interesting way of trying to quantify and summarise one's strength though. I bet a lot of people (esp. on Internet) claim to be a part of this "club" as well regardless of their form...

Using that 1RM calculator , mine would be 249 + 445 + 322 = 1,016.

My BP in particular I'm particularly modest about. I want this to be at least 130kg / 286lb like a lot of the footy players that are my size (5'9, 82kg / 180lb) can lift. A put a lot of this down to my technique. I have also been told that because Smith restricts natural movement somewhat, one should be able to lift a little more with a free bar BP. But I take that with a grain of salt.

Cheers,

Matt

Edited by God_speed

I'm not sure how widespread it is in the real world, the first I'd heard of it is on the BB forums because almost everyone sticks their 1RMs in their sig. And yes it's supposed to be 1000 pounds. Not overly impressive, like I said you'll clear it fairly easy if you have strong legs, but still a benchmark like any other. I'm more interested in how light people have been and achieved it, thus I asked about body weight and height.

I'm guessing if Ronnie can do 800 pounds on the deadlift then a 2000 club wouldn't be out of the question and would definitely offer some impressive feats of strength.

Interesting thoughts about the smith machine...I can see advantages and disadvantages to it compared to freeweight. Less strength used for balancing, but restricted motion on the Y axis for the full body to do it's compound thing. A bias could help you rather than hinder, yet you've got the extra weight of the pole sliders. Then there's the mental idea of the smith machine feeling safer for a 1RM.

I'm no where near these figures, mostly because I've never properly trained heavy for low reps. Doing strength training at the moment and benching 85 for 5 reps, squatting 100 for 5 reps, and romanian deadlifting 110 for 5 in the first week. This is at 182cm, 86.5kg.

1149.5 for me.

but this is silly.

talking in LBS is like claiming hp at the engine after getting a dyno sheet which shows kw at the wheels just to make it look bigger :lol:

Birds.

There are 2 gyms I know of in Vic that you might want to just stroll in to and have a session.

get them to give you advice on form and tips for best leverages etc.

and try some 1rms under watchful eyes and spotters.

who knows, you might get addicted.

Not all powerlifters and round bellied, bearded hairy men.

Member on here (not sure if still active) Stolen_S15 is a competetive powerlifter.

Has recently been dieting.

just got to 7.5% @ 98kg and still squats over 220, benches close to 150 and deadlifts over 250 I believe.

I dare you to go give it a try. :)

Melbourne Uni

or

PTC at Frankston

Powerlifters look bloody impressive when they cut up. Although I think they don't actually like being in that state and prefer to not have to restrict calories so they can get back to lifting maximum poundage

anyone who trains hard and then diets correctly will look impressive.

I like the second pic of Arnie doing his dips, get a real good burn in the triceps when you hit 20+ reps

pounds are fine to count if you're american. What would you train the "club" to for us using the metric system? 1000kg club?

so do I squat a good weight for my height/weight? prior to knees playing up on me (from oztag) I was squating 100kg x 10 reps for 3 sets??

yeah there isn't really an off season (unless you are a pro and only compete 1 or 2 times a year)

for regular joe blogs as an example, just in qld, there are 2 official sanctioned comps (with one federation - there are others) and 2 GYM comps and probably another 2 just bench or PUSH PULL (bench and deadlift) comps.

Same goes for NSW, and VIC.

Perth is starting up and Adelaide and NT will be soon too.

the big pros will never cut down.

point is to lift more so why try to restrict food.

I was more saying it to Birds as he is much more in to appearance than lifted numbers etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...