Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As long as it's the proper fitness model category that focusses on entire body figure, not just upper body. I recently watched a video where they were all wearing really long board shorts, and in the one scene where some of the guys were in footy shorts they looked hilarious in terms of upper to lower body proportion (chicken legs)

  On 07/06/2012 at 4:42 AM, Birds said:

Personally, I could think of nothing more satisfying than knowing you can bat with the guys who take gear when you've never touched it in your life.

I was also kind of shocked to learn a couple of years ago that "natural" bodybuilding, in terms of competing, doesn't mean you've never done it...just that you've been off it long enough for the tests not to pick up on it :/

This is why I want to compete in the fitness model category, at least it's not about muscle size in that shit.

Yeah. Turns out it's a bit of a misnomer. Read a bit of TNation and other BB sites, I learned that those comps are not even well regulated from a testing point of view; contestants are subjected to random tests and are not even accompanied to the toilet / told to remove clothes to make sure they are not substituting samples Gattaca-style.

Edited by God_speed
  On 07/06/2012 at 5:08 AM, TM7GTR said:

As long as it's the proper fitness model category that focusses on entire body figure, not just upper body. I recently watched a video where they were all wearing really long board shorts, and in the one scene where some of the guys were in footy shorts they looked hilarious in terms of upper to lower body proportion (chicken legs)

Yeah this. It's some new division of the IFBB right? The rules actually stipulate the wearing of long board shorts which is a bit laughable for anything BB related in my opinion. But getting back to Birds goals, while he might want to train legs for proportion / strength / speed, etc, the goal of looking good for the chicks can equate to less emphasis given to legs as a lot of girls don't find huge legs or a huge ass (through squats / DLs etc) that attractive!

  On 07/06/2012 at 5:08 AM, TM7GTR said:

As long as it's the proper fitness model category that focusses on entire body figure, not just upper body. I recently watched a video where they were all wearing really long board shorts, and in the one scene where some of the guys were in footy shorts they looked hilarious in terms of upper to lower body proportion (chicken legs)

  On 07/06/2012 at 5:25 AM, God_speed said:

Yeah this. It's some new division of the IFBB right? The rules actually stipulate the wearing of long board shorts which is a bit laughable for anything BB related in my opinion. But getting back to Birds goals, while he might want to train legs for proportion / strength / speed, etc, the goal of looking good for the chicks can equate to less emphasis given to legs as a lot of girls don't find huge legs or a huge ass (through squats / DLs etc) that attractive!

This is a good point. I don't know about national and international rules, but in the state competition that first garnered my interest in competing, they said any swimwear was allowed except for G-strings. So if you want to cover your chicken legs with long boardies then it's fair game. Bit lame that it's condoning the top heavy bodies, but that could work in your favour if you have a good set of proportional legs and your fellow competitors have nothing to show. Fortunately I'm a thin frame up top, so I won't need much on my legs to get a good proportion going and stave off gluteus maximus...er...maximus.

  On 07/06/2012 at 5:59 AM, NickR33 said:

cheating at a natural BB comp is the fckn lamest thing I've ever heard...

Agreed, but imagine how many would do it because they aren't competitive in the open comps!

not quite sure what your saying there... I assume your saying there's still classes for drug free athletes?

I used to think BB was way ahead of the times by acknowledging drug use and setting up another competition for drug free athletes... but if the guys who do the natural comps are just cycling off before they get tested or just cheating the tests it makes a mockery of the whole system... and is incredibly, incredibly lame

I'm saying someone who didn't do that well in steroid friendly comps would probably consider scaling back their training and use to compete in a natural comp instead, where they might have a better chance at winning.

I think that's unfair to those guys that have trained clean and enter natural comps... too much of a gray area to say well if you haven't been using in the last few months you can enter... if you've used PEDs to build your physique then you shouldn't be allowed to enter natural comps at all... just my 2c

impossible to enforce though... hence why I think its lame that guys cheat the honour system

Edited by NickR33
  On 07/06/2012 at 7:45 AM, NickR33 said:

I think that's unfair to those guys that have trained clean and enter natural comps... too much of a gray area to say well if you haven't been using in the last few months you can enter... if you've used PEDs to build your physique then you shouldn't be allowed to enter natural comps at all... just my 2c

impossible to enforce though... hence why I think its lame that guys cheat the honour system

It's almost an oxymoron (or word to that effect) to suggest anyone in competitive bodybuilding has honour...I mean, by definition of the competition you have to be fairly narcissistic and selfish - why would you care about anything other than yourself winning? Yes, I know that sounds like a blanket generalisation. You know what I mean.

  On 07/06/2012 at 5:25 AM, God_speed said:

Yeah this. It's some new division of the IFBB right? The rules actually stipulate the wearing of long board shorts which is a bit laughable for anything BB related in my opinion. But getting back to Birds goals, while he might want to train legs for proportion / strength / speed, etc, the goal of looking good for the chicks can equate to less emphasis given to legs as a lot of girls don't find huge legs or a huge ass (through squats / DLs etc) that attractive!

This one time Birds told me a story...

  On 07/06/2012 at 4:23 AM, TM7GTR said:

Girl I'm currently tuning :P

Son of a bitch. Where do I find more like her in that pic?? Fark.

Wow, turns out Troy has a better memory of my own life :unsure:

That was a funny night.

  Quote
I had a stripper ask if she could kiss me on the lips the other day lol. Then she felt my ass and told her colleague (read: fellow stripper who was giving a guy a lappie) to come over and feel it for herself lol. Dude was looking at me like wtf...I was like, sorry man didn't mean to steal your stripper.
  On 07/06/2012 at 8:58 AM, Trozzle said:

Son of a bitch. Where do I find more like her in that pic?? Fark.

Acquire aesthetic physique alcohol, go out to clubs, get lucky

  On 07/06/2012 at 1:44 PM, Birds said:

P.S. Nice taste in females TM7 :thumbsup:

I try :rolleyes:

  On 07/06/2012 at 3:05 PM, Birds said:

Wow, turns out Troy has a better memory of my own life :unsure:

That was a funny night.

Hahaha good shit, instant boner killer

Not too long ago (16 weeks ago) I jumped on the roids to see what the hype is all about. I tell you what though, if you train hard, eat properly and do it right the results are there and definitely does shock the body. I tried a combination of testoterone propanoate (short acting ester) and oxandrolone for 8 weeks. My weight went from 85kg to 95kg. Hardly any fat, mininal water gains and shit loads of weight from my legs as I trained legs 2-3 times a week. Recovery times are improved dramatically. It's no wonder why people abuse them. I did proper post cycle for 4 weeks (novaldex & clomid) and only lost a few kgs. My biggest notice was the huge increase in strength which i've kept and actually even stronger now.

Side effects seen were post injection pain due to the propanoic acid. I had a little acne on the back and right shoulder. My testes started to feel tender around week 6; post cycle my libido was dead around week 4-6 after last injection. This is when you notice a sudden drop in your test levels and the idea is to restart it as fast as you can. You don't do it right and your gone.

I can see why there's the difference bewteen 18yr olds jumping on it and others that have been training almost 10 years keeping at it strong naturally before trying something. Its not something that I will much though. It burns the pockets nicely. Post-cycle Therapy costs nearly more than the roids, however, it's more important after the cycle rather than during.

So this is some anecdotal evidence for ya

  On 08/06/2012 at 2:34 AM, vspecIInur said:

So this is some anecdotal evidence for ya

Thanks Nathan, it's good to read an anecdote that is written articulately and with no apparent bias for / against.

The idea of taking injections would be so much more appealing to me if I had a med / doc keeping tabs on levels, etc; i.e. if everything was managed to make sure nothing was done incorrectly

Universal Soldier-style

UniversalSoldier3.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...