Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I do shave it lol, that's just over a week of growth...such a pain in the ass to maintain :(

They look alright in the pic but I do have a slight zipper effect with the ab split...it's definitely not perfect but I'm not complaining (have seen some shocking splits in pics on the net). What causes it? Is it strictly genetics or does certain exercise play a part in the split too (always wondered what would happen if your situps had an offset to them lol)?

You're right about the standing pic for showing overall BF or lack of. I might take one, I just like this position because it was sitting like this that I could see (and pinch) what little fat I had left on my lower abdomen prior to cutting - it would disappear when I stood up.

Bit late on the whey discussion but I'm using this and always have since I started gyming.

Thoughts?

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/5kg-Whey-Protein-WPI-WPC-Powder-CHOCOLATE-/390411818416?pt=AU_Exercise_Accessories&hash=item5ae65b95b0#ht_3320wt_1270

Vanilla tastes fairly average but choc is decent..

Sort of related: what is it called when you pick the barbell up off the ground and in one single motion sweep it up to above your head? This is the way I pick up a barbell when I am starting a military press set. I thought it was some variation of the clean/snatch, but on googling these, they all involve a squat movement at some point...I'm literally deadlifting it from the ground to above my head in one.

That's a power snatch.

You don't have to squat for a snatch and a clean. It's not part of the exercise.

The only reason a person would squat was that so they can get lower to get under the bar as they cannot lift the bar high enough, ie alot of weight.

If the olympic lifters could lift the weight to their chest for a clean on the second movement without having to squat, they wouldn't.

If you don't have to squat to catch a clean or a snatch, don't squat.

Cheers Husky...at least it has a name now.

how does everyone find the Bulk Nutrients products? Notice any actual difference when making the switch?

Recently switched, so will let you know. So far, loving the taste of chocolate and so easy to mix (shake for 10 seconds).

eBay whey looks like the same deal as the other pure wheys; guess its just whether you trust it or not. Prolly the same stuff as BN. I found it interesting that BN gets made in NZ, sent to USA and then sold here? If you follow the labels anyway...

Hey it's not all genetics! 280 situps a week and cutting back on the fast foods...

eBay whey looks like the same deal as the other pure wheys; guess its just whether you trust it or not. Prolly the same stuff as BN. I found it interesting that BN gets made in NZ, sent to USA and then sold here? If you follow the labels anyway...

Hey it's not all genetics! 280 situps a week and cutting back on the fast foods...

Give weighted leg raises a go (in that weird 'chair' kinda thing, can't recall its proper name). Sure it fatigues the quads and works the psoas a little more than abs, but when you've got an 8kg or more dumbbell hanging from your feet without bending the knees, it does a good job of everything :P my very basic ab circuit is these weighted leg raises, to that stupid ab crunch machine, to standing oblique crunches (20kg in ONE hand then swap), to 90 second plank. Repeat.

Also how you liking the wood chops Birds? I've been doing them with the cable up a bit higher, then crunching forward more. Takes the back out of the equation a bit and focusses more on obliques.

Still doing them. I change the angle of the cable and the motion half way through to work different parts (lower back, obliques, abs, abductors)...seems to work well. For me woodchops is a no rest exercise so it's a bit of cardio too. Do one side, do another, then step up the weight and start again with no rest! = dead.

well Uni got on top of me for quite a few months there - back to the beginning :(

starting again in the morning prior to start of new uni semester, havent been to the gym for 4 months now, not good

must try to find a good middle ground between study and 3 weight sessions a week

enjoyed far too much iced coffee of late

as for 'no rest' - thats how Ive always attacked the weight work, no rest as such (30secs between sets at most, and the walk to a new exercise area is rest enough) to keep the heart rate & sweat up, means you dont need to worry about cardio IMO

^Hey, I took 3 months off cause my wrist was farked (still sort of is..). Uni, football games + training and gym... Its hard... Also the reason why I now skip leg days else I just can't run.

Rest thing - I do rest a fair bit between sets.. Don't usually get sweaty after a weights session..

There is such a thing as too little rest. With buggerall rest between sets you can be achieving the same as doing one set until failure. Your muscles will fatigue and "pump" too much before getting properly worn down. Better off slowly breaking them down over time.

A good test of rest times is if you can push out the same number of reps on your max weight for two sets in a row...if the sets are vastly different then you may need to increase rest time. If they are the same you can decrease rest time until you start to see difference. Somewhere in between is the happy spot! As a general rule though, anywhere from 30-90 seconds depending on exercise is a good timeframe.

phew, this thread went a bit ghey there for a second... all this talk of chest shaving and abz brah... lol ;)

seriously though, medicine ball throws, kettlebell movements, are good for core strength and if done as a circuit burn fat as well... no need to do endless crunches, leg raises etc IMHO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...