Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Another benching question. Since changing my form and pinching my shoulder blades together, I find I'm only contacting the bench at two points on my shoulders. is it normal for those to be quite tender? I'm assuming I'm just getting used to having the pressure on those areas specifically. Bench padding isn't stellar either.

Managed 8-8-6 last night, it's a weird feeling though as the strength starts to wane. There's no discomfort in the chest/shoulders just lack of pushing power.

I've never understood the need for padding with squats. We're all different, but I don't even have well developed traps and after the first week of squats I couldn't feel a thing :/

had recorded the mens 77kg and saw this post... was watching it last night and every time someone stepped up to snatch I was thinking this might be it lol... then the Korean stepped up and they were talking about all the injuries he's had in the last few years... then BOOM... ouch!

Lu Xiaojun is a beast... new snatch and total WR

lu-xiaojun-2009-11-24-7-43-33.jpg

LuXiaojun.jpg

Albuterex anyone used this stuff or know of anyone who has?

Its about $75 a container and you should only take half a spoon a day.

From what I have been able to find about it some people have said its good.

Others have taken to much and smacked out.

One of my mates is currently taking it and says he is already shredding.

lol no I have no idea what it is tbh, but considering it's repped by 'Chestbrah' etc it's likely a gimmick piece of shit.

http://ausbb.com/bodybuilding-supplements/19582-has-anyone-tried-albuterex.html

lol @ avatar pics on AusBB and BB forums...always good for a laugh at how shit most people look in them, either fat or way out of proportion. Is it me or does that Max Brenner guy look like he hasn't done a squat in his life?

You're not fat for shit Dan, wut?

You'll find what little fat you may have will quickly vanish when you get into property lifting etc. eat properly and more frequently, you won't have anything to worry about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...