Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

no carbs after 7 is an older rule. not going to go into all the ins and outs or the pros and cons to it now as I dont have the time.

plenty of professionals follow the rule (maybe not power lifters) and I am talking fighters, wrestlers, actors prior to shoots, etc.

No carbs after 7pm? Gain muscle? Fcking lol. You really think your body knows what time you're eating???

Screw fasting... I love food.

Just train more

My opinion exactly, nothing wrong with eating after 7pm if you are trying to build muscle. Especially if you only just finished at the gym, you definently need to get food into you.

This information is for those overweight and are carb sensitive.

They should not eat processed carbs before bed

Those trying to gain muscle should be eating every 3 hours at least

Ant Tom, for the fatties, the body might not know what time it is (it does), but it does know if you need fuel for energy, and if it doesnt, it just stores the carbs for when it does............as fat.

So while some of the information posted is accurate, typicaly, not all of it is

As you mentioned though, this applies mostly for endomorphs trying to lose weight.

If you're a gym going guy trying to gain size, you're cheating yourself if you try to limit your carb intake to earlier on in the day.

Personally I don't get back from the gym until around 9.30-10pm on most days, so late at night is one of the most important times for my nutrition.

Can't beat a big glass of milk before bed.

So I take it you train people at your gym with powerlifting techniques to help them lose weight?

If so, that changes it up from the norm quite a bit as all everyone else does is high rep ranges and circuit type work.

Great question.

Here is what I do when I get new clients tell me they want to exercise to lose weight.

I get Max and the fattest client in the gym, Dave or Spiros etc

I explain they both train exactly the same, now do you think its the exercise or what they stick in their mouth?

Exercise burns around 500 calories an hour BUT if you walk or jog, once you stop your metabolic rate drops back to normal pretty much straight away, if youve been doing HEAVY resistance work it can stay elevated for hours, thus burning more calories

While all exercise is catabolic, heavy resistance training can promote an anabolic experience if provided with food straight after training, walking and jogging cant because you havent put enough load on your muscles.

Thats why squats are more effective than 10 isolation exercises done in the same workout, but the dumbest comment belongs to those that do exercises to "shape" a muscle. Idiots. You cant change your muscle insertions.

You listen to clowns saying preacher curls hits the lower bicep while concentration curls builds the peak. f**k I laugh when I hear that.

Someone please post up a pic of Arnold doing a double bicep. His right bicep is peaky while his left is long, I guess he trained each arm differently lol

I could go on for hours

For those interested I now write articles for Ironedge, read them here if you like

http://www.ironedge.com/blog/category/articles-by-author/markos/

I'm also doing similar. Dropping about 7kg over 3 or 4 months to drop in to the lower division to have direct competition as there are about 3 others with similar lifts and age and height etc.

Have you found your sessions difficult at all with the changes in your diet/drop of weight? Lifting around the same or less?

I'm doing compound lifts right now with a slight diet alteration to cut bodyfat (yes I want to get a bit more ripped for summer) <-- lol-worthy but true

It isn't lol worthy, do what makes you happy. I'll cut in a month or so for about 4 weeks, dgaf what people think tbh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Cool to see you're on the forum man, think you've met my twin brother a few times (Brent).
    • Yeah...but NA Mercedes V12.
    • Yeah everyone always seems to refer to them as S13 wheels however they came on R32 Skyline, A31 Cefiro, C33 Laurel etc., and also came polished diamond cut or painted depending on the model. Congrats on your GTS purchase! I'd personally leave it NA.
    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
×
×
  • Create New...