Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Interesting looking through those figures for the main lifts.

Close friend of mine is about 90kg

BP 175kg (new PB tonight)

DL 220kg (last I heard before he screwed his back)

SQ ???

Would have to double check with him on his dead and squat figures, but the interesting thing in posting these results up is that he doesn't do any strength specific programs, nor has he ever done so.

In other words, he does bodybuilding-type training but still lifts big.

Some people are just genetically gifted with muscle insertions etc that allow them to be absolute animals in the gym no matter what. Exhibit A would be everyone that trains at Markos' gym... But they also train hard and make the most of their genetic predisposition.

That's a huge bench for that deadlift lol.

You can get strong without it being your goal or focus - it's just the byproduct of a) working hard at the gym with the right exercises, b) eating lots and c) resting sufficiently. People who aren't getting stronger tend to lack one or more of these (whether on purpose or unintentionally). And yes, as Mitch said, some people are just genetically set up to be strong...like the Maori guy who sits on the bench next to me and pushes out 140x10 without taking a breath. Bastard looks like he's been training for 3 months :/

The end goals of bodybuilders and lifters might differ, but the core methods for getting there are much the same. Plenty of bodybuilders lift big numbers...even training specifically for hypertrophy; you don't get that sort of mass without lifting big (insert Ronnie Coleman vids here). And your mate is still doing the big 3 that lifters focus on in their strength programs - no matter how you do these, you're going to wind up with some strength. Isolation/assistance exercises, popular with bodybuilders, can definitely help with the lifts too.

Most of the bodybuilders that lift big numbers started out powerlifting i.e. ronnie coleman, johnnie jackson, franco columbo, even old arnold was weightlifting and powerlifting before he went into bodybuilding. And this is only a small handful ;)

No offence to your mate, but a gym lift is MILES different to a comp bench.

I had a guy telling me who could bench 165kg at his gym. I invited Simon to PTC to show me. He missed 140kg.

He started training with us and eventualy benched 170kg

To give you an idea the 90kg WR open men bench with GPC is 170kg. At WPC its around 227.5kg by Greg Doucette

thats because of the epic pause they make you take with the bar on your chest in comp isnt it?

It's a combination of a few things, until you've competed you don't understand the different pressures placed on a lifter in comp compared with the casual-esqueness of lifting in training.

( ^ that, and some people just talk complete shit about what they can lift)

Edited by GHOSTrun

If he can bench 175kg he can bench 175kg. Why the need too put PTC and official power lifting comps above everyone/all else?

May be hard to believe, but some people do not want to be power lifters. (and I'm not just talking about weak people)

If he can bench 175kg he can bench 175kg. Why the need too put PTC and official power lifting comps above everyone/all else?

May be hard to believe, but some people do not want to be power lifters. (and I'm not just talking about weak people)

Gym lifts don't mean shit. Olympic Jnr lifter Pat Mendez snatched 207kg in training, his best snatch in official competition is ~170kg'ish. That's a HUGE difference.

Like I said in the post above, until you actually compete, you don't understand, and there's no point trying to argue the point because if you haven't competed you simply don't know.

Gym lifts don't mean shit. Olympic Jnr lifter Pat Mendez snatched 207kg in training, his best snatch in official competition is ~170kg'ish.

How can it drop 37kg ? If the bar is the same Etc what is the difference?

Gym lifts don't mean shit. Olympic Jnr lifter Pat Mendez snatched 207kg in training, his best snatch in official competition is ~170kg'ish. That's a HUGE difference.

Like I said in the post above, until you actually compete, you don't understand, and there's no point trying to argue the point because if you haven't competed you simply don't know.

No what you don't understand is he still bench pressed 175kg (assuming he did).

He didn't say he bench pressed 175kg to whatever federation standard you guys lift under, he just beched 175kg. I'd love to hear you tell the guy at my gym that I see consistently bench pressing 170-180+kg that he hasn't benched 180kg because a judge didn't say he has.

I'd love to hear you tell the guy at my gym that I see consistently bench pressing 170-180+kg that he hasn't benched 180kg because a judge didn't say he has.

Take a video and post it up otherwise it didn't happen. I'll give you one week to do so otherwise you will forever be known as a shit talker on this forum.

How can it drop 37kg ? If the bar is the same Etc what is the difference?

I'll let Markos explain, he's had much more experience with comps + lifters than me so his answer will be more accurate.

I've only competed a handful of times, and contrary to what I'm saying about gym lifts, most of my PB's have actually been done in comps, but it's definitely a different feeling to lifting in the gym, way out of your comfort zone which can make a huge difference. It's also why Markos runs so many comps through the year so his lifters have ample opportunity to get experience.

Edited by GHOSTrun

Take a video and post it up otherwise it didn't happen. I'll give you one week to do so otherwise you will forever be known as a shit talker on this forum.

Do you really think he cares what some guy on a forum thinks?

I've seen him do it, and he knows he's done it because he was under the bar when he did it. Nothing else matters

Do you really think he cares what some guy on a forum thinks?

I've seen him do it, and he knows he's done it because he was under the bar when he did it. Nothing else matters

My post was nothing to do with him, it's about your credability. You've got to understand that on the internet it's very easy for people to talk shit, we've all seen it before, so if you want to be taken seriously you have to provide some proof otherwise you're just another mo-mo dreamer waste of dots on the screen.

It's ok if there isn't a guy at your gym benching 4 plates just say so and we'll move on...

Edited by GHOSTrun

Lol if that's your attempt at 'trolling', you'll need to try harder (or not at all would be my suggestion)

You've got tickets on yourself if you think I'm worried about whether or not you think I'm credible.

Not sure what I'd have to gain by lying about SOMEONE ELSE'S figures whom I don't acrually know

I'm not going to film him because a) I don't know him and b) I'm pretty confident that I can say on his behalf that he couldn't care less about whether or not you believe he has benched 180kg.

Just to stir the pot ha ha......but, I used to be able to raw bench 175kg (spotters /no belt), squat 235kg (no belt /no spotter) but, I never competed, was a snick over or under 90kg. The thing is that the PB's were on the days the stars aligned and I trained by myself alot with no pressure. I experienced plenty of days when I was a fair whack off the PB and can only imagine how nerves would play a part in a comp.

Seeing or hearing about big lifts can be inspirational. There's no point calling BS unless someone is claiming personal hero status or a record ( since I stated the above I can cop the BS tag if people think I deserve it). I think more constructively it's better to ask ' what do you need to do to get to a big weight on bench?' There seems to be more point to that.

10yrs have past and I am out of shape. However, I still remember what I would need to do to get strong again on those lifts (though at 40 I wonder if I could beat them). The first thing I would do is get to a gym with some powerlifting people in it,as I know the benifit from coaching on lift tech, apart from the diet, it determines how limited you will be in long term progress.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...