Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If he can bench 175kg he can bench 175kg. Why the need too put PTC and official power lifting comps above everyone/all else?

May be hard to believe, but some people do not want to be power lifters. (and I'm not just talking about weak people)

If it helps you sleep better at night, we took a vid of him doing the lift. Paused at chest level too if that makes it official. I'll see if I can get it off his phone.

Nothing makes it a competition lift if it wasn't at a competition.

But if its paused on the chest without spotters touching the bar then its an excellent gym lift :)

Whoa, everyone take a deep breath.

I ONLY commented because the OP said something about strength training an in a way insinuated his mate was stronger than PL, who compete, thats all.

I never ever competed and had zero interest in competing, so I never compare my gym lifts with those of my competing clients. It doesnt mean I never lifted those weights, but I never benched xxx after I just did 3 squats with over 200kg prior, so I cant compare

This guy is strong regardless, because to hold 175kg over your face is not done by girly boys.

He doesnt need to present a vid, no one does, like someone said he just trains for himself in the gym, just like I did.

I hope one day he, and anyone else that strong, does compete, because I hate seeing wasted talent, which he obviously has.

We had a BB do one of my novice comps recently, apparently he banches over 170kg in the gym, he weighs around 92kg.

He made a good 160kg bench press, with zero PL experience, so clearly very strong

He actually benched 170kg but got 3 red lights on his 3rd attempt

His other lifts were 220kg squat and 220kg deadlift, he always trains with wrist straps and pulls 250kg +, but he couldnt hold onto more than 220kg without them, which surprised him.

He is VERY strong and does zero strength training, he won his first IFBB BB comp

So there are very strong gym lifters out there, what most are saying its VERY different in a comp, as Michael found out

It should be harder! Less range of motion for the roll back and you pretty much have to hammer curl them too (well at least the way I do it).

Fark hammer curling them haha!

I just use my knees to flick them upto my shoulders then sorta roll back at the same time. Works for me at the moment. Be interesting to see how I go when I start doing the 40's.

Recently with the 40's I've been getting someone to hand me one of the DB's when I get into position rather than spending too much time in struggle town getting them there myself. More energy for my actual set.

Fark hammer curling them haha!

I just use my knees to flick them upto my shoulders then sorta roll back at the same time. Works for me at the moment. Be interesting to see how I go when I start doing the 40's.

I use my knees too, but when you get to 35s on a 45 degree incline, your knees can only do so much - need to involve biceps and delts just to get them into starting position!

It's worsened by me usually having come off lat pulldown / chin ups as my token pull exercise on push day = biceps already dead!

Maybe do your benching first or something to see if it makes it any easier.

I don't have the bench at 45 when I incline bench, I found it was working my shoulders more than chest so I moved it down to like 35.

I train alone, so I have become a firm believer of "if i can't get the weight into position, I probably shouldn't be lifting it..."

The reason I do 45deg is because it's smack bang between the angles of my flat bench and behind neck military press. I also have a bit of a back arch while pressing, so that gives it a little bit of a shift towards chest. Though I probably should have less of an angle, as I'm pretty front delt heavy :/

I adopt the same principle for lat muscles, where I'll do seated row (0 degrees), behind neck wide grip pulldown (90 degrees) and close/V grip pulldown in front (not really 45 degrees, but still in between).

Decided to step up my incline dumbells to 35s...getting hard to roll them into starting position!

I thought you'd be doing heavier than that. is that for a straight press or is that press twist (not sure on the real name for it)?

Re the angle, I've dropped it down a bit from 45 to lessen the strain on the front delt which I am overworking at the moment.

Edited by SRS13

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...