Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 18/01/2013 at 5:17 AM, Birds said:

Yes your bulging discs are doing a great job of that. Strengthening doesn't fix bad form, correcting with proper technique does. I'm not avoiding any weakness here...the back and core get worked just as much in my method, only less susceptible to injury because it's a stricter movement.

My 2c on this one for what it is worth , from past experience.

You have a point about stabillity, thats why sitting or bending the knees with a relatively lighter weight is a good place to start in terms of 'balance'.

However, once you are over a certain weight (body weight for sure) you basically need to have lots of stabilisation all the way up. So legs to core to shoulder girdle ,even wrists. Each of these should not be troubled and totally up to the task before going crazy. They are supporting muscles so should have more than you need to balance and stabilise as the shoulder press should not be used to target them.

Even if you bend your knees or sit, not enough shoulder stabilisation or core strength will see you get an injury with bigger weight.

However , I think where Ghosty and Husky33 are comming from is; once you are lifting strong across those areas a bodyweight press with locked legs won't trouble you.

In the mean time, best practice is as you said ' slight bend in the knees' or sit down and for the safest plan use a lighter weight if you don't have the confidence to press.bodyweight yet.

Edited by rev210
  On 15/01/2013 at 10:54 AM, Birds said:

160 as of tonight! And weighing in at 79.7kg...that's double bodyweight :D

165...somebody stop me! Head started spinning as soon as I locked it out :S

Gotta run out of steam soon; at this rate I'm adding 10kg per week.

  On 18/01/2013 at 5:17 AM, Birds said:
Yes your bulging discs are doing a great job of that.

My back injury wasn't caused from MP, it was caused from overzealous DL'ing with bad form, which in my defence, I was fairly new to lifting back then and lacked the experience to know better - some of us just have to learn the hard way unfortunately. Hindsight is a wonderful thing...

  On 18/01/2013 at 5:17 AM, Birds said:
Strengthening doesn't fix bad form, correcting with proper technique does.

Generally yes, but also no. Correcting technique doesn't automatically make you strong, you still have to train... and think about what 'form' is for a moment. Correct 'form' is generally the most efficient way to perform a movement or action, that doesn't mean it is automatically safe, for example, if a novice overloads the bar and tries the lift with "good form", injury may still occur because they are weak. On the flip side, doing movements in "bad form" but in a controlled manner to build strength in compromised position/less-efficient movement, aids in strengthening the movement when done in correct form, for example, "good mornings" to assist squats etc.

  On 18/01/2013 at 5:17 AM, Birds said:
I'm not avoiding any weakness here...the back and core get worked just as much in my method, only less susceptible to injury because it's a stricter movement.

I disagree. CBF explaining why but as a simple test, try and do your seated press weights standing and tell me which is harder.

I don't do seated press, I do standing behind neck shoulder press...with split legs and knees slightly bent. My back stays strict throughout the whole set and I do 50kg x 10 for 3 sets + 55kg x 6 for 3 sets, so not that light.

  On 18/01/2013 at 11:42 AM, Birds said:

I don't do seated press, I do standing behind neck shoulder press...with split legs and knees slightly bent. My back stays strict throughout the whole set and I do 50kg x 10 for 3 sets + 55kg x 6 for 3 sets, so not that light.

that's light

  On 18/01/2013 at 12:41 PM, Husky33 said:

that's light

For an 80kg 6'3 guy it's not, but I'm not going to argue subjectivity with someone who has rustled jimmies.

Hey, I probably couldn't do 60kgx10 atm, but i will be the first to admit that it is light. And the only reason it is light is because i don't train it as much as everything else, like yourself, and 99% of people.

It's actually pathetic when you look how much higher my bench is.

  On 18/01/2013 at 11:25 AM, Birds said:

165...somebody stop me! Head started spinning as soon as I locked it out :S

Gotta run out of steam soon; at this rate I'm adding 10kg per week.

Grats on 165 birds, that's awesome

  On 18/01/2013 at 11:42 AM, Birds said:

I don't do seated press, I do standing behind neck shoulder press...with split legs and knees slightly bent. My back stays strict throughout the whole set and I do 50kg x 10 for 3 sets + 55kg x 6 for 3 sets, so not that light.

it's not light for the conditioning goals you have but, it's really quite light if you are talking a standing press at your weight. Again only relative to people who care to lift heavy as their goal.

I'm sure you could train to do heavier if you wanted to but, you are doing what is best for your goals. You don't need to shovel huge weights on the shoulders without good reasons anyway.

  On 18/01/2013 at 11:25 AM, Birds said:

165...somebody stop me! Head started spinning as soon as I locked it out :S

Gotta run out of steam soon; at this rate I'm adding 10kg per week.

That's big increases! Once you get up to where you should be you'll definitely slow down.

I was the same up until 165kg lol, that was my figurative brick wall. I think my grip failed on 170kg at the same point I couldn't really complete the lift, and have only attempted it once.

Good work Birds, keep dat shit up!

  On 18/01/2013 at 12:56 PM, Husky33 said:

Hey, I probably couldn't do 60kgx10 atm, but i will be the first to admit that it is light. And the only reason it is light is because i don't train it as much as everything else, like yourself, and 99% of people.

It's actually pathetic when you look how much higher my bench is.

  On 18/01/2013 at 2:41 PM, rev210 said:

it's not light for the conditioning goals you have but, it's really quite light if you are talking a standing press at your weight. Again only relative to people who care to lift heavy as their goal.

I'm sure you could train to do heavier if you wanted to but, you are doing what is best for your goals. You don't need to shovel huge weights on the shoulders without good reasons anyway.

It's not light in that the potential for injury is very much there should you use bad form, which is why I brought up what I lift for that exercise in the first place. It's like a 100kg deadlift - nothing in the scheme of lifting and what people are capable of, but you can still do a lot of damage if your form is out.

  On 19/01/2013 at 12:02 AM, Trozzle said:

I was the same up until 165kg lol, that was my figurative brick wall. I think my grip failed on 170kg at the same point I couldn't really complete the lift, and have only attempted it once.

Good work Birds, keep dat shit up!

For someone with a spinal injury, that's a great lift! My grip felt like it had more in it, but 165kg was the first time my back had to put in a lot of effort to get the weight up / started running out of steam. Grip seems to be fine for 1RM stuff, it's the sets of 10 where sweat builds up and resetting my reps turns it to shit, even with much lower weights.

  On 19/01/2013 at 2:02 AM, TTT said:

Chalk.

I don't care what the gym says.

Use it.

I use chalk now, my family/fitness/franchise gym supplies it lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Stock ECU (or more accurately stock tune) absolutely refuses to go over 10psi and behaves like you have seen. The Nistune is the same if it is the stock tune. If the Nistune chip has been tuned, the resulting tune could be literally anything for any combination of parts. The Nistune just makes the stock ECU Tunable.
    • So stock ECU does not like anything above 10 psi?  That Nistune one is just for "try" if it will be any different, I know it need to be tune for that. I know but YOU may know about these problem but i/we dont. They few little Skylines here let alone people who know anything about tham so that is why iam asking here  
    • So now we have a radiator with no attachments whatsoever. It lifts up with a particularly tight spot between the drivers side air box mount and the lower radiator outlet, but if you've got this far you will sort that too. This is the lower mounts with the rad out so you can see where the rubber bushes go, it is a straight shot upwards Done! Assembly is the reverse of disassembly, with blood less likely to be shed.
    • Right, onto the second last trick. The Air Con condenser is mounted to the front of the radiator and stays in the car when the radiator is removed. There are 2x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the condenser to the radiator, remove those The bottom of the condenser is attached to the radiator with clips. You need to lift the condenser out of those clips and clear (up, then forward). f**ked if  could work out how to do that last bit with the front bumper on. I hope you can, and you share the trick.  Bumper removal probably deserves its own thread one day once I've recovered the will to live, but basically you need to remove the wheels, front inner guard liners (clips and 10mm headed bolts), the self tapper between the guard and the bumper at the rearmost point of the bumper (same as an R32 that bit), any remaining clips at the top/front of the grill, an absolute bastard design with a plate that holds the top of the bumper above the headlight each side (only 1 bolt which is tricky to get to, but the plate catches 2 places on the bumper and must be removed....carefully!) and push clips between the bumper and guard under the headlight. If you've done all that you will be faced with wiring for the fog lights on both sides and in ADM Q50 RS at least, 4 nasty tight plugs on the driver's side for the ADAS stuff. So, the clips at the bottom look like this on drivers side (looking from the front) And on the passenger side (also from the front), you can see this one is already out Clearance on both of these are super tight; the condenser needs to move up but the upper rad support mount prevents that, and the radiator can't move down far because it is (rubber) mounted. Once you achieve the impossible and drop the condenser off those mounts so it does not stop the rad moving, you are good to go
    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
×
×
  • Create New...