Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My Fitness Pal can be hard work Dan, but I agree with Troy's point about using it on a PC so you can see the nutritional value confirmed by other users. You also see a much more detailed food content breakdown.

I eat a banana every day and when I put it into my food diary I always laugh, 'banana, medium, no skin' - who the f**k eats the skin?

My Fitness Pal can be hard work Dan, but I agree with Troy's point about using it on a PC so you can see the nutritional value confirmed by other users. You also see a much more detailed food content breakdown.

I eat a banana every day and when I put it into my food diary I always laugh, 'banana, medium, no skin' - who the f**k eats the skin?

Similarly to your banana example, it isn't clear that when using "Fresh - Banana Raw" or other reliable entries whether or not you should weigh the f**king thing with the skin on or not. Weighing it without skin isn't exactly what I'd consider practical, but weighing it with the skin isn't accurate either.

If I had to do that shit on the regular I'd rant as hard as Birds did about calorie counting and would honestly just add 1 rep to everything as a calorie buffer rather than waste my time with apps like that.

As I said earlier though, you do what works for you. I do not have the patience for something like that, I'd rather just jog an extra few mins (or have another shake if I was trying to go up instead of down).

I'm a lazy kent.

I just go the banana, medium (without skin) which is the 110g one.

Bananas arent really as nutritionally good for you as I thought (105 calories, 27g carbs, 1g protein) but they satisy hunger cravings, hence why I eat them.

I I was using it on a PC, still thought it was shitty to use.

I work in IT though so I'll happily bitch about everything that isn't fully awesome.

Like most graphic user interfaces and website navigation these days! Have totally turned to shit and are NOT user friendly!

I just go the banana, medium (without skin) which is the 110g one.

Bananas arent really as nutritionally good for you as I thought (105 calories, 27g carbs, 1g protein) but they satisy hunger cravings, hence why I eat them.

Potassium and fibre, among other vital nutrients that we completely overlook when focussing on calories and macros.

If you want something filling that has barely anything to it, hit up pumpkin/butternut squash and salads more. Decided to actually measure everything I put in my salad the other night, and for something that filled me up quite well (given my appetite and stomach capacity, this is decent), it came to 66 calories LOL

Birds: Funnily enough, I tend to find that the increase in "app" development for things like phones and tablets has made developers a bit smarter at presenting info and more efficient navigation.

PC App and Web interface devs still have a ways to go.

That's just apps though; they're idiot proof and often have so little customisation/info that you can't get it wrong presenting info (some still do). Websites though, fark me they use terrible psychology in their menus and layout. It's all cluttered and overlapped in favour of looking pretty and sacrificing functionality! Bring back websites of the 90s and early 2000s where you knew where to find what you needed in two clicks.

Potassium and fibre, among other vital nutrients that we completely overlook when focussing on calories and macros.

If you want something filling that has barely anything to it, hit up pumpkin/butternut squash and salads more. Decided to actually measure everything I put in my salad the other night, and for something that filled me up quite well (given my appetite and stomach capacity, this is decent), it came to 66 calories LOL

I do eat pumpkin but not so much squash, do you put it into your salad?

I do eat pumpkin but not so much squash, do you put it into your salad?

As far as I'm concerned, it's pumpkin lol. Just technically it's apparently a squash. And yeah, I'll put it in anything and everything I think it will fit lol. Diced into small cubes, oven roasted, then ditched in salads or as a side to steaks etc.

I know right?!

worst-website-ever.jpg

Exactly what I'm talking about! In 10 seconds you've read all the relevant links to all the info you need, faster than anyone could from a modern website. It's right there, clear as crystal, in black and white. Good day sir!

Well tonight was very beneficial in terms of learning.

Working with Matt was really helpful.

Here's what he had to say.

Squat: high bar form is fine but flexibility is not great, he had me widen my stance and let my feet rotate out a bit which helped with depth, even without my block under the heels.

He said I should be aiming to low bar though as its better for an overall workout and uses more posterior muscles. I tried it and found it "interesting" he said keep practicing but said my form was fine overall, but again not great flexibility and depth.

He said ultimately I was selling myself a long way short on the weight I could be doing right now and that I was not trusting my strength enough.

Bench he said was pretty decent but wanted me to keep my elbows closer to my body. Same thing as squat about the weight, plenty more in the tank he said.

Deadlift was the main reason I went and after showing me a few things I pulled a set of 8 at 80kg with ease then did another set at 100kg. He said he was confident I could rep 120-140. I was blown away with being able to get 100 up and far easier than I thought. I believe him that I could do a few reps at 120 plus.

Maybe the most important thing I learned was a better idea of my lower back position and that I have been over compensating. When I think it's rounded it's actually very flat.

All in all money well spent.

Edited by ActionDan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • it was good to see our presence at GTR festival..hope to see more SAU at these events 
    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
×
×
  • Create New...