Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bought some BN WPI natural and vanilla.

The natural flavour tastes like powdered skim milk but ok if you make smoothies with it. The vanilla has a very faint taste too it. Definitely would choose ON in the flavour department for an extra $20.

I can see where you're coming from - the vanilla isn't really a strong flavour. I like it because it's simple and has the highest protein percentage, but I do agree the chocolate is much better! Banana isn't bad either, if you like the fake banana flavour haha

I'll grab BN chocolate next. I prefer paying cheaper and taste isn't a big thing for me anyway as i only have it once a day. Was just giving my thoughts for others who may not have had those flavours.

If I am doing a bike ride in the same day I am doing a PPP session I add a schoop of chocolate icecream to my shake, because I am a disgusting animal.

I use BN vanilla.

Edited by Nee-san

Dan I WAS paying $50 for 2lb of ON Gold Standard, til I started having 2 shakes a day.

If I were to get sucked into the bro marketing of the local supplement shop, I'd be paying ~$80 a kilo for Max's or Dymatize stuff!

Yeah the BN is $100 for 5kg of WPC.

I bought some fitbodies protein off ebay, $85 for 4kg. Serve size 30grms - 27grms protein, 1.2grms carbs and 0.8grms fats per serve. Chocolate tastes very good, better than BN. Mixes well with no clumps but does froth up a bit.

Little dubious on the protein claims and I'm sure the scoop is slightly bigger than 30grms but if taken at face value it's a very good protein at a terrific price.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Uniclutch install vid, RB Track edition.   Highlight reel is very drive able, not noisy but still heavy with the clutch master he has.      
    • And....if that could be true for all R34 GTTs, then it might be good. But in reality it is not really any better than my standard instruction to "go out and have a look at it yourself, and wave a tape measure around" etc etc, because as soon as you have any adjustable arms, or coilovers with smaller diameter springs, or tyres that have any bulge that goes out further than the rim, etc etc, then the simple version of the information is still potentially misleading. Plus, nothing in this is static. Everything is moving. At the rear the wheels swing inward at the top as they go up, so the clearances on the inside change as the suspension is compressed. At the front it's even worse. And then you have the difference in absolute wheel position in the arch can move around more, or less, depending on how compliant the bushes are. If, like me, you have sphericals on the front caster rods (and on the FUCAs also, but these are probably less dominant when it comes to wheel position), then your wheel will swing forward/backward under loads, as well as up/down, as well as steering angle. You end up having the simple numbers with 17 caveats/footnotes for each.
    • Both windows operate normally while the engine is running but start to sag as soon as I switch off.  Does anyone know of reasonably priced replacements or other brands that will fit?
    • Actually PowerFC is probably the easiest to get basic data from, it comes with a hand controller and display so you don't need to remember to pack a laptop every time you drive. It also has a PC based viewing/logging option if required. Nissan used consult on these because back in the mid 80s, ODB was just a glint in a standard's body's eyes.  They switched to OBD shape around 2000 (my 2001 Cima had OBD shaped but not OBD compliant port) With the standard ECU there is a cable and software available to give basic data too, I think it is called Nissan Data Scan or s
×
×
  • Create New...