Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bought some BN WPI natural and vanilla.

The natural flavour tastes like powdered skim milk but ok if you make smoothies with it. The vanilla has a very faint taste too it. Definitely would choose ON in the flavour department for an extra $20.

I can see where you're coming from - the vanilla isn't really a strong flavour. I like it because it's simple and has the highest protein percentage, but I do agree the chocolate is much better! Banana isn't bad either, if you like the fake banana flavour haha

I'll grab BN chocolate next. I prefer paying cheaper and taste isn't a big thing for me anyway as i only have it once a day. Was just giving my thoughts for others who may not have had those flavours.

If I am doing a bike ride in the same day I am doing a PPP session I add a schoop of chocolate icecream to my shake, because I am a disgusting animal.

I use BN vanilla.

Edited by Nee-san

Dan I WAS paying $50 for 2lb of ON Gold Standard, til I started having 2 shakes a day.

If I were to get sucked into the bro marketing of the local supplement shop, I'd be paying ~$80 a kilo for Max's or Dymatize stuff!

Yeah the BN is $100 for 5kg of WPC.

I bought some fitbodies protein off ebay, $85 for 4kg. Serve size 30grms - 27grms protein, 1.2grms carbs and 0.8grms fats per serve. Chocolate tastes very good, better than BN. Mixes well with no clumps but does froth up a bit.

Little dubious on the protein claims and I'm sure the scoop is slightly bigger than 30grms but if taken at face value it's a very good protein at a terrific price.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Regardless, it doesn't seem wise especially on RBs to actually chase MBT. Timing scatter is the big one on stock CAS, even if that's fixed overshoot is worse than undershoot. 
    • It's all about reducing the overall output. Reduce the source of it, you have wayyyy less to deal with in every other step and trick you play with. It's why something like a modern vehicle, so VW, Audi etc, there's thousands of tables for the ECU to calculate what it should be doing with the engine.   Why would you NOT reduce emissions the most effective way possible, when it has very minimal tradeoff, AND manufacturers are always struggling to meet the current standards.
    • Ran into this bloke trying to give Oscar some advice pre-race today.
    • Yeah I've personally seen the RB26 pull 30 degrees of ignition timing out of the base timing map if the ECU detects a cold start, it nearly starts misfiring because of it around 2000 rpm and it feels like the engine has no power. I'm just surprised that modern OEM control strategies are actually trading off efficiency for in-cylinder emissions. I would expect something like aggressive EGR dilution + tumble generation valve use to improve EGR tolerance to reduce in-cylinder NOx + HC from crevice volume while also reducing throttling loss vs pulling out some timing if not knock-limited.
    • *** DATE CHANGE *** Date has been changed to Saturday 17th May. The time and location is still the same!
×
×
  • Create New...