Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sounds about right to me, but out of the mentioned movements all I really focus on is the clean and press, I am trying to learn to snatch but I am finding it a very hard movement to pull off.

Hence the only real clarification from me would be in the clean and press, well the press part any way, with a mil press the bar is pressed up but slightly forward, with the clean and press the press ends with the bar straight up and the head pushed forward with the shoulders pushed back (head through the window)like a clean and jerk.

Well at least this is how I was taught to do it, I firmly believe this is the best full body movement there is, others may differ but it is my fav, it smashes me and makes me puff.

Yes I'm a fan boy, plus it scares most of the gym plebs away from the rack area where they do their concentration curls for the girls,LOL.

Clean then military press for reps is an old favorite of mine. It's good to know you can pick the weight up off the ground as opposed to from a shoulder height rack. I haven't done it seriouslyt since a single attempt earlier this year , 105kg for a few reps, vid on my training log.

The press is always head through the window style. Unless you are sitting on reclined bench or doing the 'bro' version behind the head.

  • Like 1

OK I need some clarification here on some lifts and what their goddamn f**king correct names are lol...I'll detail what I believe some they are, so just correct me if I'm wrong.

Clean

Loaded bar on ground > explosively lift bar and shrug it real high then get under it in to the bottom of a front squat position, then front squat it up to standing

Catch position of a Clean
athw69_lg.jpg

Power clean

Same as clean, but starting from knee height a lighter weight that you can pull higher in the second phase of the lift and then a slight dip of the knees to get under it and catch it higher and then stand up.

Power clean catch position
how_to_power_clean.jpeg

Clean and jerk

As per clean above > Slight bend in the knees then press up through the legs hard and push the weight over head and drop to a lunge stance of sorts to get under the bar, while keeping the bar where it is to finish with it above your head and arms locked > move back to standing position

Clean and press

Same as clean and jerk, but final stage is a strict military/front overhead press from shoulder height rather than dropping your body under the bar

yep. but towards the end before it was removed from the olympics it kind of became more of a standing incline bench press.
press%2B3.jpeg
1968OlympicPress2_2.jpg

Am I right?

Mostly
Edited by TTT

Read this in today's age for a bit of a laugh

http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life/blogs/stark-naked/grunty-gym-bloke-its-time-to-shut-the-hell-up-20131113-2xfrd.html

I really couldn't care less if others grunted at the gym

Someone I know recently got banned from our gym for being too loud and doing 1RM's

Love this comment.

Omg, seriously??? If you don't like your testosterone gym, go some where else. There are now heaps of womens only gyms available. It really sounds like you are in the wrong gym. There is no need for over reacting. Also if you can't or don't want to join a womens only gym, there is also a thing called earphones. Whack one of them on, listen to your favourite tunes, and stop whining.

CommenterPaulo Location Date and time November 13th 2013, 11:17 pm

Yes ,some people really are very controlling ,and manipulative of others freedoms of expression ,arent they?

CommenterKane Location Date and time November 14th 2013, 7:12 am

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...