Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah I'm still a bit torn between Simplest Strength and BBB as Simplest Strength calls for 3x10 sets of ab and lower back work twice a week, and many respected coaches say that situps and back extensions are bad for your back (most of the fancier stuff like ab wheel rollouts I don't have access to and not strong enough for hanging leg raises).

yeah I'm still a bit torn between Simplest Strength and BBB as Simplest Strength calls for 3x10 sets of ab and lower back work twice a week, and many respected coaches say that situps and back extensions are bad for your back (most of the fancier stuff like ab wheel rollouts I don't have access to and not strong enough for hanging leg raises).

do situps bending at the hip holding the core straight, sliding hands up to the knees, holding and back down. not crunches,

you will feel it in your lower abdominals more.

Do side bends, or torso twists with a bar.

condition is called Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricle Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy or ARVD/ARVC for short.

It is a heard condition that effects the right centricle, bascially the ventricle increases in size until a point where the heart just stops. Commonly found in athletes that die suddenly for no apparent reason.

What they believe is that high levels of exercise especially stuff where your heart rate spikes and lowers and spikes some more (HIIT training is another no no) stresses and effects the heart differently to people with the condition compared to people without it.

do situps bending at the hip holding the core straight, sliding hands up to the knees, holding and back down. not crunches,

you will feel it in your lower abdominals more.

Do side bends, or torso twists with a bar.

Could also plank, normal and side. 100% contraction, compared to top 1/3 for a situp/crunch and no negative impact to the back.

V-sits on a bench are good, as are leg raises with legs overhanging the end of the bench.

Links?

I'm eager to hear the opposing view point from genuinely knowledgeable people, not keyboard warriors.

I take the mouse thing with a grain of salt. A friend of mine, in Melbourne, works in a lab that uses mice for cancer research, the positive effects of that research have translated to humans so saying a test was done on a mouse as a reason for dismissing it is pretty stupid, a lot of testing is done on animals before it goes to human trials.

it's more the fact that it's a correlative rather than causative study- the comments I found were in discussion of the Guardian article of pretty much the exact same thing.

I used to get wound up by these things, but there's so many health benefits attributed directly to high protein diets that I find this sort of stuff to be quite alarmist.

I think the important thing to look at with these sorts of studies is the metadata - i.e. were some of the mice obese, sedentary or active? What sort of diet were they fed specifically?

It's no secret that many of the world's oldest living cultures have a carb heavy protein light diet - check out Alan Aragon's dissection of Paleo here - he goes into this phenomena in some detail http://www.nsca.com/uploadedFiles/NSCA/Inactive_Content/Program_Books/PTC_2013_Program_Book/Aragon.pdf

Age old saying right, "Everything in moderation"?

Atkins is great way to shed bodyfat but I personally wouldn't use it year round. I don't know about you guys but when I'm on a low carb diet I eat heaps of veg, particularly greens, so it's not like the diet is completely skewed towards protein it still needs to be rounded.

I am of course am a health/nutrition noob.

In the end if you want to gain muscle your protein intake needs to support that. Get big and die trying seems accurate

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...