Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah it's hard to eat enough protein if you're not trying to gain weight, that said, I don't really like the taste of WPC and tend to find it bloats me, so I prefer blends or WPI. I do have to tell a lot of people that I don't think that protein powder has any magical effects etc etc though.

I can definitely agree with you on the idiotic notion that protein powder is absolutely required to build muscle, and is treated like some kind of magic dust hahaha

I don't necessarily think it's too difficult to hit protein targets through normal food intake, though anything above 200g for me personally ain't coming from foods. It's doable for sure, however lately I've been struggling with bloating (and absolutely no f**king idea why....), so I'm resorting to powders a lot more just to avoid feeling like shit.....coz that's counter productive in my books. Bloat = no interest in training (ESPECIALLY squats and deads) = no progress.

Like today I've so far consumed no more than a single regular flat white coffee, and like 125g of lamb w/ 100g each of brown rice and veg. Other than that, I only just finished my shake I started drinking over an hour and a half ago. Admittedly it was 4 scoops of WPC to make up for the lack of real food....but I feel FULL. Like I just ate a f**king baby.

She's not vegan but doesn't like milk

Eats eggs, Greek yoghurt, broccoli, tofu, cheese, bananas, spinach, bread, maxibons etc.

I doubt it's 150gm without shakes, but with them she would be around that

It's around 150g without shakes. I used my fitness pal, when I was first calculating my macros, so I think I have a better idea. I don't use calorie counters anymore as I eat the same foods regularly and know the protein count of them. For example; my morning snack is chobani yoghurt (Greek) which contains 17.4g protein per 170g container. My breakfast averages to 36g of protein (oats, banana, maca powder, flaxseeds, hemp seeds, linseeds) My afternoon snack is 2 eggs with 2 slices of grain bread which is 48g protein for the eggs and 9g for the bread. Lunch and dinner vary but always contain at least 1 cup of broccoli which alone is 50 calories. Add in tofu, beans, spinach, quinoa, brown rice, legumes, chickpeas, lentils..

I eat around 2000 calories a day, it's not hard for me to obtain 150g protein from the foods I consume.

Edited by L33SH

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...