Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You should feel deadlifts more in your lower back than your legs.

Generally yes, but there's more than one way to do deadlift's, and small changes such as which way you look can make a difference.

As long as your lower back stays flat during the lift it should be ok :)

Chucked in some deadlifts for shits and giggles out of boredom this evening...normally part of leg night, but hey - it's TECHNICALLY a "push" exercise yeah? lol

100kg ezmode 3 sets, no touching ground between reps.

Not sure if you were been sarcastic, but deadlift's are obviously a pull exercise. And why not touch the ground between reps?

That's the basic rule of a standard deadlift...

Its the same as touching the chest on the benchpress, not stopping on the ground can make it easier because your missing a small portion of the lift.

I would always recommend completing the full range of motion, unless there is a reason not to.

Similary with military press, going all the way down is the hardest part of the lift, you won't get stronger without doing it.

It's the same reasoning behind not locking arms straight when doing a press (particularly shoulder/military) - constant load. Sure it technically might not be a "deadlift" but why should I HAVE to do it that way?

I'm talking stopping about 1" from the ground by the way, it's almost the complete range of motion, just without the momentary release of load (rest?)

Does anybody have a solid 6 day routine link or PDF etc?

I'm looking for grouped muscle days not periodization and cardio on the so call "off" days. After more of an athletic look as opposed to body builder, so over it. Don't mind if it's a program which needs to be purchased :)

rubbish you need to pull DL from the floor ALL the time... you can DL from blocks, hang or pins to work on your lockout... okay so technically called a rack pull when from the pins but you get what I mean

the hardest part of the deadlift is the eccentric, the last bit when your putting the weight back on the ground... most normal gyms won't let you drop the weight so sometimes doing them from a hang (when the bar goes just below your knees) is a good option when going for reps

I think full ROM is best most of the time but that doesn't mean you can't work on certain parts of a lift separately... and it will still make you stronger

bouncing the bar off your chest on the BP is worse than stopping a bit short IMHO

rubbish you need to pull DL from the floor ALL the time... you can DL from blocks, hang or pins to work on your lockout... okay so technically called a rack pull when from the pins but you get what I mean

<cut>

the hardest part of the deadlift is the eccentric, the last bit when your putting the weight back on the ground... most normal gyms won't let you drop the weight so sometimes doing them from a hang (when the bar goes just below your knees) is a good option when going for reps

<cut>

bouncing the bar off your chest on the BP is worse than stopping a bit short IMHO

Rack pulls, stiff leg deadlifts, and everything else are perfectly valid reasons not to go to the ground.

There's nothing wrong with shortening the range of motion, but then it usually becomes a different excercise or poor technique! The person I was replying to sounded like he was doing it as part of his technique on normal deadlifts.

For the record, I do rack pulls, stiff leg deadlifts, AND normal deadlifts. I also bounce the bar off the chest outside competition :P

EDIT: When deadlifting from blocks I'd still touch the ground, unless I was trying to emphasize a part of the lift. Anyway, my post was fairly specific to the person I was replying to :)

yeah fair enough... master the basics with good technique and full ROM is definitely the best way to start

my gym doesn't like people dropping weight... sucks trying to gently place a heavy DL back on the ground... I usually get away with a little drop but it does make life difficult

Its the same as touching the chest on the benchpress, not stopping on the ground can make it easier because your missing a small portion of the lift.

I would always recommend completing the full range of motion, unless there is a reason not to.

Similary with military press, going all the way down is the hardest part of the lift, you won't get stronger without doing it.

I have to agree with the military press part, particularly as I do shoulder press behind the neck and a lot of people don't have the flexibility or strength to have the bar below head level and press it up from there.

Does anybody have a solid 6 day routine link or PDF etc?

I'm looking for grouped muscle days not periodization and cardio on the so call "off" days. After more of an athletic look as opposed to body builder, so over it. Don't mind if it's a program which needs to be purchased :)

If you're chasing athletic, no need to gym for 6 days man...do 4 days a week on a 2 day push/pull split, with cardio on the days you don't gym = athletic.

On Monday, I did a personal best in wide grip pull ups in that workout session. 8 reps with 15 sets with clean motions at my current weight of 78.5kg and it felt like I can do much more. So next week I will do 8 reps with 20 sets. :thumbsup:

I've have finally found what works best for me. Intially I use to do split workouts but decided to go for the 1 bodypart per day (yes ppl believe that it's a useless approach). I've seen my weight go up from 79kg to 87kg in 5 weeks and my strength gains have increased so much I thought I was scaring myself. Definitely have shocked the body now :)

Most weight has gone to my chest and legs with minimal fat gain

On that note, I've started taking pre workouts (jack 3d/mesomorph) and have increased my protien intake quite a bit for that extra synthesis.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...