Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Each to their own, some people find statistical goals useful, others prefer to measure how well they're doing with notches on the belt or a glance in the mirror. There is such a thing as being too low in bf, shredded can look ugly, so there's support for not having a specific KG goal and using the mirror instead. You also don't want to be so light that someone will throw you around in a contact sport or a fight lol. But on the whole muscles do look much sexier when they aren't surrounded by fat.

your right about the not getting too light, being bigger sure does have its advantages

asthetically u look bigger under a shirt, but woudlnt mind keeping the size with the abs showing through... obviously you cant have both unless ur juiced up

ill just train hard and eat right and see what happens... cant go wrong with that haha

You want to be able to look good in a shirt as well as out of one :)

Heaps cut but less muscle mass = look good without a shirt but no one will give you a second look in one; when bulking up you'll look good in a shirt but can look soft and undefined when you take it off.

You want to be able to look good in a shirt as well as out of one :)

Heaps cut but less muscle mass = look good without a shirt but no one will give you a second look in one; when bulking up you'll look good in a shirt but can look soft and undefined when you take it off.

that is the dilemma,

unless ur one of my mates who is 120kg and mildly ripped

stupid genetics :domokun:

Each to their own, some people find statistical goals useful, others prefer to measure how well they're doing with notches on the belt or a glance in the mirror. There is such a thing as being too low in bf, shredded can look ugly, so there's support for not having a specific KG goal and using the mirror instead. You also don't want to be so light that someone will throw you around in a contact sport or a fight lol. But on the whole muscles do look much sexier when they aren't surrounded by fat.

Here's something I reckon a few of you boys will like, some of you might have seen it before.

A guy has analysed dozens of elite bodybuilding competitors from 1947 up to 2010; those who apparently were competing in natural competitions. Obviously, many of us know what that means; in brief, that at the time of testing you had not recently used gear and the testing methods are somewhat dubious. However, what he found after poring through a tonne of statistical data, was there there is a very good correlation between the body weight of competitors, and their height and bone structure, as defined by wrist girth and ankle girth. The calculation also takes into account body fat percentage.

Anyway, there is an interesting article that accompanies the calculator if you feel like a bit of a read, but in any case the calculator is here. You'll see the link to the article on that page. Unfortunately you need to input your measurements in imperial units.

For those of us trying to maximise muscle mass, knowing how much muscle can realistically be developed without resorting to gear is very valuable knowledge. Due to all the guys we see around who are on the juice, either in pro BB or just in the local gym, many of us who aren't interested in juicing have got no idea of our actual potential - we either over estimte what we can achieve, or become defeatist and set our goals too low.

Now clearly, one can't really expect to reach 100% of what the calculator spits out; there are so many variables involved such as sleep, diet, body type, naturally-ocurring testosterone in the body, and not least genetics, plus the fact that generally all of us are gainfully employed and don't have time to train for 2 hours, 3 times a day. But it at least allows us to get some perspective.

About 9 months ago I was hovering between 80-85 kilos and about 17% bf maybe. I've worked my ass off to get to 80 kilos with 13.3% bf and am really happy with that, but like everyone else can see room for improvement here and there.

My stats;

Height: 69"

Wrist 7"

Ankle 8.75"

Bodyfat 13.3%

= Max bodyweight of 203.5lb = 93kg muscular / 211.7lb = 96kg bulked.

So if I kept my body fat the same as today, the theoretical maximum bodyweight I could be, natural, would be to gain 13kgs of muscle. Again, that's based on pro/amateur BB'ers, so even if I was to achieve 60-70% of that over the next several years (about 88kgs @ 13%bf) I'd be extremely happy.

In an ideal world, I'd also want to be about 10% bf, so my max muscular would be 88kg / 91kg bulked. At 2 kgs of lean muscle per year, that would take me 4 years to achieve.

Anyway, hope some of you guys enjoy. :)

You want to be able to look good in a shirt as well as out of one :)

Heaps cut but less muscle mass = look good without a shirt but no one will give you a second look in one; when bulking up you'll look good in a shirt but can look soft and undefined when you take it off.

Hahahaha so true. It probably doesn't help that you'll wear the same size clothing when you are bulked and when you are cut. When I was 89kg (still fairly lean, I didn't have a gut), all the friends said I looked like a tank...but they only saw me in the tight fitting T shirts. When I would sit down in my car, I could see the small rolls of fat compress above my pants and belts that were comfortable when standing became uncomfortable when sitting :(

Now at ~80kg with what I believe is the same muscle mass and the only compliments I get are from the missus or other gym junkies.

The guy on the right.. just incase u didnt know haha

LOL, that boat looks like it would struggle to carry him. He looks taller than 6'2 but it probably helps that there is a shorter/smaller guy behind him.

I play against these 120kg+ giants in footy (AFL) sometimes. The f**kers should be playing rugby! They are shit slow to move around, but, when you're in a marking contest, f**k. They come down on your foot, studs and all, and it takes about a week for the pain to go away.

That calculator is awesome Matt, I entered 10% BF (this is what I want to achieve eventually) and it came up with 93-94kg. Target set thumbsup.gif

I know hey Tom. Gives you some perspective. As I said it's not perfect, and to even get to 70% of that maximum would be brilliant, but at least it helps with setting a goal. Of course my main goal is to look good (and be fit) but I'm a numbers man as well, I like to be able to quantify things. Not the be all and end all, but it helps :)

I'm currently 73.5kg

F UCK YOU TO HELL TONSILLITIS!!! F UCK!!! YOU!!!!!

Yes I realise a fair crack of this will be fluids. lol still shits me to tears that I haven't had this since late 90s

Mate let us know what your weight is 1 week after you get better; I bet you bounce back. Just rest up and keep drinking the water. I swear once I had tonsilitis on one side and when it finally got better the other one went off a week later (swapped sides somehow)... gave me the shits!

Hahahaha so true. It probably doesn't help that you'll wear the same size clothing when you are bulked and when you are cut. When I was 89kg (still fairly lean, I didn't have a gut), all the friends said I looked like a tank...but they only saw me in the tight fitting T shirts. When I would sit down in my car, I could see the small rolls of fat compress above my pants and belts that were comfortable when standing became uncomfortable when sitting :(

Now at ~80kg with what I believe is the same muscle mass and the only compliments I get are from the missus or other gym junkies.

LOL, that boat looks like it would struggle to carry him. He looks taller than 6'2 but it probably helps that there is a shorter/smaller guy behind him.

I play against these 120kg+ giants in footy (AFL) sometimes. The f**kers should be playing rugby! They are shit slow to move around, but, when you're in a marking contest, f**k. They come down on your foot, studs and all, and it takes about a week for the pain to go away.

Yeah I bet you run circles round em. Gotta play to your strengths! I reckon they'd be tiring a lot faster as well; they gotta lug an extra 40kgs around. AFL players physiques are better suited to medium distance (~400m) running I reckon; NRL / Rugby players are more suited to short distance (~100-200m). So those dudes you play with would be better suited to league or union for sure.

Yeah I still wear shirts that are about 10 years old :P

Cardio after work today I think.

Edited by God_speed

I'm currently 73.5kg

F UCK YOU TO HELL TONSILLITIS!!! F UCK!!! YOU!!!!!

Yes I realise a fair crack of this will be fluids. lol still shits me to tears that I haven't had this since late 90s

how tall are you again? im almost exactly the same weight as you haha. my goals atm is to fill out a shirt properly. im sick of having room to move inside a size 39 neck slimfit

how tall are you again? im almost exactly the same weight as you haha. my goals atm is to fill out a shirt properly. im sick of having room to move inside a size 39 neck slimfit

173cm I think it was when I measured myself last, lol

Hahahaha so true. It probably doesn't help that you'll wear the same size clothing when you are bulked and when you are cut. When I was 89kg (still fairly lean, I didn't have a gut), all the friends said I looked like a tank...but they only saw me in the tight fitting T shirts. When I would sit down in my car, I could see the small rolls of fat compress above my pants and belts that were comfortable when standing became uncomfortable when sitting :(

Now at ~80kg with what I believe is the same muscle mass and the only compliments I get are from the missus or other gym junkies.

LOL, that boat looks like it would struggle to carry him. He looks taller than 6'2 but it probably helps that there is a shorter/smaller guy behind him.

I play against these 120kg+ giants in footy (AFL) sometimes. The f**kers should be playing rugby! They are shit slow to move around, but, when you're in a marking contest, f**k. They come down on your foot, studs and all, and it takes about a week for the pain to go away.

haha yae obviously the bigger u get the more u slow down, even a couple of kilos here and there count..

f**kin amazing thing is though he'll still run a 2.4km in the 9 mins, and can sprint fairly well too... some people are just machines

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • It makes you wonder, all these people starting to make a billet replacement head, I wonder if any have thought about trying to adapt tech from newer engines into them. You're already at the full design stage to make a billet head... Why not really spice it up and had some more modern tech into the mix too...
    • Connect all the plumbing up properly. The actual worst part about having the turbo unable to actually build boost, is you can and likely would over soon the turbo if you drove the car (free rev while stationary isnt likely to manage it).   If you do have an air leak as Duncan suggested, you'll have a bad time as the AFM will be saying different to reality.   As you have had the engine out, I'd go over all electrical connections again. If you have a consult cable, plug it in, and see what the ECU thinks is going on. Did you touch the timing belt? If so, double check your timing on the gears is correct AND put a timing light on it while it's idling and see what ignition setting you have. Is the AFM you've installed the one that was in the car previously? You said you replaced seals, what seals exactly? What have you had apart?   From memory when I had my RB25DET with factory throttle, there was two plugs the TPS plug on the loom could go to. One would leave the car running like shit, the other made it work, I think one plug on the TPS area was for something else (an option). It's too many years since I saw that part of the loom to remember properly though.   Is the car idling smooth (as smooth as an RB can)? Does it smell fuelled up?   I have a feeling either timing in timing belt is off, or a sensor isn't right.
    • Theres still skid pan and motokhana days up in QLD at least that are $100 or less. The ones that are ran as "driver training" less so, they're expensive, but just normal skid pan days like SAU ran are still low cost. And thats one of the places I learned to be a lariken, purely by asking for passenger rides, and how people were doing crazy things. Reese gave me plenty of pointers back in the day for skid pan! And yes Duncan, I will never forget your pointers for track work. Especially after Neil got out saying "I am NEVER getting in the car with him again!" 😛
    • 49719 is the cooler loop. Right at the front, LHS of that diagram. Return line from rack (LP side) goes to cooler loop on RHS front of car, then back under engine and returns to bottom of tank. 49717M is feed from tank to pump. HP line out of pump is thick rubber, followed by the hard line that runs down to crossmember and runs in parallel (but opposite flow direction) to the LP return line. Nothing goes anywhere near the firewall or interior of car. The closest they get to that is the connections on the rack.
    • Thanks, plan is to drain all fluid tomorrow and do smoke test to find out the leak.   Appreciate your help and want to understand how the system work. So cooling is achieved by the long loop not any rad? The diagram seems to suggest it connects to somewhere inside the cabin and I thought that is a cooler inside firewall. If you look at the diagram it seems to show it connects to something inside firewall. I tried chasing it but not easy unless I take loads off   i am confident pump is good as fluid goes in and it gets soft( steering) but as soon as I turn engine off , loads of bubble come to surface and overflow. When engine is on , fluid level is below minimum but when off it shoots off and thinking it is sucking air in. I suspect aluminium pipe may have a crack line or whole   smoke test with no fluid should be a good start and if needed will remove the pump   In addition, the one going under the engine bay is high pressure line and one directly connecting from pump to resorvoir is return/ low pressure?   finally I searched and suggestion is to use dexron 2 but that is discontinued so bought dexron 3 as all research suggest it is compatible and shouldn’t cause any issues/ blow seals. I bought two liter of dexron 3 motul atf
×
×
  • Create New...