Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Nik

Was doing that movement but instead of laying on a bench and holding it. He was half way up a pole holding with it pressed against his right shoulder.

Kinda hard to picture I guess from my discription but it's hard to explain.

yeah sounds like he's been watching those ghetto exercise vids on youtube where the guys do all the crazy pullups in the local park... (and never seem to train legs)

regardless, even people doing silly shit in the gym don't deserve injuries that are that serious... fingers crossed the damage isn't permanent

Question for Birds,

How much size do you usually lose in your upper body (chest, shoulders, arms, back) when you cut? Talking visuals here btw, I no longer care about figures.

I'm about to start cutting back a bit so I'm curious as to how much width and thickness I will shed in the process (do you drop a shirt size?)

Edited by TM7GTR

Gotta use some figures cause its too subjective otherwise!

At 89kg I was a tight 34 for pants size, at 80kg I'm a comfortable 32. I don't know where all the fat came off cause my stomach wasn't that big at 89; must have been pretty evenly distributed.

As for t shirts and tops, I like wearing slim fit / body hugging stuff. So before, my arms were stretching the sleeves (loved the tight fit, half of the bicep exposed etc.) and a couple people would say "that t shirt is too small for you (lol no shit)". Now, the same t shirts are comfortable snug...bicep isn't popping out like before, but it hasn't turned into a loose fit t shirt. It's not all bad shrinkage though...your waist gets thin too, which maintains (or improves) the "pizza slice" for any size that comes off the upper body.

To sum it up, bulked = look better with top on, cut = look better with top off. These days a lot of females seem to be going for the lightweight MMA fighter physique; lean/cut muscle on a thin frame...so cut gets my vote for this reason haha. I haven't lost any strength from cutting either...not that I dieted harshly or anything; it was quite a slow and steady cut.

Should ask Joey for his input as he did a similar thing to me...might have bulked up again since though?

Gotta use some figures cause its too subjective otherwise!

At 89kg I was a tight 34 for pants size, at 80kg I'm a comfortable 32. I don't know where all the fat came off cause my stomach wasn't that big at 89; must have been pretty evenly distributed.

As for t shirts and tops, I like wearing slim fit / body hugging stuff. So before, my arms were stretching the sleeves (loved the tight fit, half of the bicep exposed etc.) and a couple people would say "that t shirt is too small for you (lol no shit)". Now, the same t shirts are comfortable snug...bicep isn't popping out like before, but it hasn't turned into a loose fit t shirt. It's not all bad shrinkage though...your waist gets thin too, which maintains (or improves) the "pizza slice" for any size that comes off the upper body.

To sum it up, bulked = look better with top on, cut = look better with top off. These days a lot of females seem to be going for the lightweight MMA fighter physique; lean/cut muscle on a thin frame...so cut gets my vote for this reason haha. I haven't lost any strength from cutting either...not that I dieted harshly or anything; it was quite a slow and steady cut.

Should ask Joey for his input as he did a similar thing to me...might have bulked up again since though?

Thanks for the reply man, I see what you mean too. I'm not going to change my diet yet (cutting calories from carbs) but i've started getting into cardio again so i'll see how I go about cutting down.

Thinking I should take a photo now, and in about a month to track progress.

I dont really get the whole bulk and then cut thing.

I know you have to eat a lot of healthy foods with lots of carbs/protein when you are trying to put on muscle, but that doesn't mean you need to get fat I don't think.

Sure if you are competing in body building comps then I can understand cutting, but for the everyday person why not just maintain a healthy diet and put on muscle at the same time?

I'm by no means huge or anything but I have definently put on muscle over the last few months by eating healthy/lots in combination with doing weights.

Most people seem to look decent to me before they start cutting anyway...

Yeah def take photos Tom, I wish I had. I only have one or two from when I was 89, just me tensing my arm, so I'll try and replicate the pose this week to show you the difference in arm appearance.

There's no reason you can't gain muscle without doing bulking and cutting crap, Mitch. Let me set it straight, my bulk and cut wasn't a traditional bodybuilder type thing...I originally stacked on weight purely because I wanted to weigh more and then, realizing I didn't like how I looked, I turned to cutting to bring my weight back down and get my abs back.

That said, I'm no expert on nutrition, but when I was stuffing my face I had heaps more energy to get through workouts. So I guess bulking is more about giving your muscles an over-supply of carbs and protein to build more muscle, gaining fat is a by-product of it...cutting is simply getting rid of the fat that results from this process.

In extreme cases, i.e. bodybuilding, where there can be 20-30 pounds difference between the on/off season, it's obviously not going to help muscle building if you're trying to maintain a 5% BF. During a "bulking" phase a BB might be 20% which a lot of people would consider average BF.

Maybe markos can throw his 2 cents in here; I remember one of the newsletters going into detail about gaining lean muscle vs bulking/cutting.

Do they all come with their arms ripped off or is that the R-Spec model? (cwatididthar?)

Edit: damn, thought this was Vic wasteland, my joke will go unappreciated :(

Do they all come with their arms ripped off or is that the R-Spec model? (cwatididthar?)

Edit: damn, thought this was Vic wasteland, my joke will go unappreciated :(

Vic wasteland whore checking in

Try eBay Rimon?

Replicate the photo Birds, it would be good to see a comparison for low fat storing areas like your arms.

The only reason I bulked was the same reason as Birds, caught the bug of wanting to weigh more after being the skinny kid. Now i'm starting to hit the puffy stage where you just wish you had your abs back so it's time to push the weight ego out the door for good.

Fair enough. I'm not that concerned about weight. I was 73-75kg at 6'1 when I started going to the gym last October. Now I hover around 80kg and I daresay that would be more if I actually worked my legs for the first 6 months haha!

I don't think I would like putting on fat and seeing definition disappear, hence why I'm not doing the bulk/cut thing to a huge extent. I like to be able to see the gains rather than having to diet to see them.

I might try to drop a little bit of bf% once I'm happy with where my development is at, but the reality is that even at my current bf% my abs are easily visible, so I think I'm doing ok.

Good luck with the cut, summer is coming up!

Edited by Mitcho_7

'Lean bulking' is the way to go! I aim for 1-1.5kg a month so that nets me some fat gain but of the 11 kg I've put on over the year and a half my pant size has stayed them same.

I might do a cut closer to the end of the year, will probably regret it though because I probably won't be as big as what I want to be but I should be able to hit my strength goals by then which is what matters more to me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...