Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pec major Muscle.

http://radiology.rsna.org/content/210/3/785.figures-only

yes, sure its one muscle, with one insertion, but does in fact have two seperate origins

Let's let it go! I'm pretty sure there will be emg studies out there that show no difference in electrical activity between either pec head during incline bench.

If nothing else, it is something for everyone to think about I guess!

I have a question about this though. Maybe someone smarter then me can answer.

the lower part of my pecks, ie around the nipple is much puffier then the upper area.

why is that so?

If as Markos said, doing bench works the entire peck, then why hasn't mine grown evenly?

Is it as simple or complex as hormones? more fat stored lower? am I growing a vagina as TTT would say?

hahaha growing a vagina....

Yes there are two insertions (for pec minor, pec major) but starting with incline presses won't actually stimulate growth there too much more than a flat press. Hell, even if you do mill presses with a slight angle back on the bench your chest contracts.

Just jab an epipen into pec minor then hit your incline presses....

Figjam, doth thou even hoist?

lol kidding, but if you're really trying to gain size as you say, then yes, you will have deposited fat in your lower chest which gives you that sagging/bitch tits look. If you were to cut back some bodyfat your chest would probably look more like you want it to.

figjam is 70kg dripping wet.

he doesn't need to lose weight.

Here's what you do.

those wanting to focus on hitting the upper anterior middle pec - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get rid of the puffy lady nipple area - DO SQUATS

those using 1.25kg increments on deadlifts - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get cut-for-summer - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get farkenhayuuuugebro - DO SQUATS

those wanting to cure cancer - DO SQUATS

those who feel that their wang is heading inwards to become and inside out penis like vagina - DO SQUATS...... and grow a beard.

figjam is 70kg dripping wet.

he doesn't need to lose weight.

Here's what you do.

those wanting to focus on hitting the upper anterior middle pec - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get rid of the puffy lady nipple area - DO SQUATS

those using 1.25kg increments on deadlifts - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get cut-for-summer - DO SQUATS

those wanting to get farkenhayuuuugebro - DO SQUATS

those wanting to cure cancer - DO SQUATS

those who feel that their wang is heading inwards to become and inside out penis like vagina - DO SQUATS...... and grow a beard.

I'm totally with you TTT about the squats, but he (tm7gtr) said he needs to lose bodyfat,not weight. which he does if he wants to get rid of saggy nips.

The muscle building that creates the shape sure as hell counters it though. And will contribute a long way to being muscular and lean

Edited by jangles

I agree, I wouldn't focus on losing fat if muscle/size was the intention.

but fat is fat, whether it's over big muscles or little muscles.

if he wants shape he needs bigger muscles.

If he wants a lean look, he has to be lean, if he developed big pecks and never lost the fat, he will still have saggers

Edited by jangles

Paraplegic? DO SQUATS

Anyone concerned with building body shape always worries about their pecs, and rightly so: pecs are weird in shape, they differ for everyone, probably more so than abs. And yes, they often look more like saggy, girly A cups when you first start to build some muscle there...but the trick is to just build more muscle, because eventually pecs get big enough to "even" out a little bit and occupy more of the "upper chest" as some call it. And yes, body fat can be responsive for flab making them look saggier. The way you stand with your posture will change their appearance too. Shoulders back motherf**ker.

I still don't like my side on profile, but it's much better than it was when I first started gaining muscle there. In short, lift moar.

As big as Arnie was, even in the pic below you can see that the pec is bigger down low...it's the natural seating of the muscle. But he has so much muscle there that they've taken on a pronounced shape of their own...somewhat independant of natural bone structure...and no one would ever say he needs to work on his inclines.

Arnold-Schwarzenegger.jpg

I get the puffy nips sometimes (generally in hotter weather), feelsbadman.

I've seen a few people who are 70kg and look bigger than someone who is 90kg so don't know where all this generalisation that 70kg is skinny...Will depend on height though.

lol

last night I didn't start my workout like usual with squats or deadlifts as I wanted to work on my bench and pressing exclusively... weirdly even though I did about 8 different exercises it didn't feel like a workout... I wasn't tired (apart from a massive delt/tricep pump) and I left feeling unsatisfied and annoyed...

plus I missed a paused 120 bench... I now have 10 days to get this lift or I'm going to have a tantrum in front of a whole bunch of people

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
×
×
  • Create New...