Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also Dan...do a pinch test with your stomach skin/fat...it's the cheapest and easiest way to see if you're gaining or losing fat. It's not accurate, but it's better than looking in the mirror and it doesn't need to be accurate. Good biofeedback.

This is basically how I control how much junk food I can afford to eat or need to cut back on to sit around my happy 10%

Im going to say there isn't too much muscle mass gained there. but thats only my opinion

Interesting, I'd always thought that squatters got bums. What are you basing this off? Just personal experience? A study?

Glutes, hamstrings and quads. They make your butt bigger.

This is what I thought, but maybe I just want that to be the case because I'm now J-Lo...

Why can't you be more like Troy and send money without all these legitimate questions.

I'll be sending a sample of BN chocolate as it's one of the most commonly purchased proteins/flavours on here and it's the only one I've got. I based the cost on only sending in one sample. I assume $50 or whatever it costs will only cover one sample.

If it doesn't go ahead or there are any indiscrepancies, I'll just refund your monies through PayPal.

OK I'm on board.

Also Dan...do a pinch test with your stomach skin/fat...it's the cheapest and easiest way to see if you're gaining or losing fat. It's not accurate, but it's better than looking in the mirror and it doesn't need to be accurate. Good biofeedback.

This is basically how I control how much junk food I can afford to eat or need to cut back on to sit around my happy 10%

I hear people talk about this but what's the best way to go about it?

If the chocolate tests positively, then no real reason to do any other flavour. Good enough indicator that they're legit.

Agreed, I'm using the WPC but if they are right about the WPI then I'll assume they are legit.

I'm gonna assume it's his mum's, lol.

Also again I don't see the point in testing multiple products. Test 1 (choc WPI) - if it's pretty well spot on what the label claims for protein content, then we should be confident all their products will also meet their label claims.

This is amusing for 2 reasons.

1) The subject and message content was not mum appropriate.

2) 16yr old using mums account... lol

He's not legally allowed to have his own paypal account.

(I realise a 16yr old totally can have one, shaddup :P)

Interesting, I'd always thought that squatters got bums. What are you basing this off? Just personal experience? A study?

This is what I thought, but maybe I just want that to be the case because I'm now J-Lo...

OK I'm on board.

I hear people talk about this but what's the best way to go about it?

Agreed, I'm using the WPC but if they are right about the WPI then I'll assume they are legit.

I was basing it off the fact that even if your muscles have grown, the reason you are larger is because the fat hasn't disppeared. unless youve grown ridiculous amounts of muscle.

At 10% bodyfat women start to get problems, their periods stop etc, or become very infrequent. They start to look manly in the face. Most mistake that for being on gear.

I'm talking about a true 10% on a dexa scan, not a broscience one

At 10% bodyfat women start to get problems, their periods stop etc, or become very infrequent. They start to look manly in the face. Most mistake that for being on gear.

I'm talking about a true 10% on a dexa scan, not a broscience one

11 in women in about a 5 in men I think?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...