Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The only way to accurately measure if you've lost muscle would be dexa scans. Pretty hard to trust even an honest eye, given a 16" bicep can turn into a 15" bicep dropping from 12% to 9% bf, yet retain the same muscle tissue. Fat does make muscle look big, even if it detracts from the shape of it / look of muscle separation!

Ahh looking good in a T shirt versus looking good without the T shirt...the eternal struggle.

Birds is pretty much 100% correct in his posts

Its why I come across as a prick, I genuinely hate what society has become.

Its superficial.

You guys are all talking about choosing. Astounds me, youre not paying attention.

Martin and Max, in my opinion, look better than anyone on this forum and I can guarantee, by their WR, can outlift them. Now I havent seen everyones physiques, so its a silly comment, but you get the jist.

If I am to have a 1000hp GTR, does it have to look like a shitter? Pretty sure it can have nice paint and wheels yet still be fast. Sure, its harder to have both, but so more satisfying.

There are only 3 rules in life

1. Be aggressive

2. Be more aggressive

3. Never be satisfied

Could my guys have achieved their physique without getting stronger? Of course

Could they lift as much and look like crap? Of course

How good though to have a brilliant physique and be stronger, I suppose it makes them the kind of guys you want to avoid at parties when your chatting up chicks

Society today is what has made these 2 standout

They would be decidedly average in the 50's through to the 70's

Nothing people do or dont do today surprises me, nothing. At 51, I reckon I've seen every example of person I never want my sons to be, in and out of the gym.

On our car forums we mock guys with NA cars that are covered in bling. Amazing.

society is what society is.

since being on 5 x 5 my lifts have certainly increased, but my physique has become a lot more sloppy then it was. This is with no change to diet or other habits. I think this routine isnt intense enough, especially for someone who doesnt consider themself to be strong to begin with and require large breaks between sets.

thinking I might change it

Edit*

Have been thinking something simple, full body 3 times a week. Focusing on strength, cardiovascular health and obviously looks.

Wide grip chin ups 3 x to failure

Squats 3 x 10

Bench 3 x 10

Cable Seated Row 3 x 10

Military Press 3 x 10

SLDL 3 x 10

Under grip chin ups? 3 x to failure

Rest is a maximum of 2 minutes per set.

verdict?

Edited by -FIGJAM-

It depends Markos - most people these days just want to look like Zyzz clones for example, regardless of strength or how much they can lift. sad but true.

Going to start with your program as of Issue 39 next week, still unsure on what to do on the cardio days though due to the gym not having kettlebells or the room to do things like the Farmer's Walk. Will have to devise something. Got one gym partner on board, the other is full of excuses such as not enough rest time, boring etc etc, what would "some guy in Melbourne" know bla bla bla. Can only lead a horse to water I guess.

BTW what is the difference between the IPF and GPC?

Birds is pretty much 100% correct in his posts

Its why I come across as a prick, I genuinely hate what society has become.

Its superficial.

You guys are all talking about choosing. Astounds me, youre not paying attention.

Martin and Max, in my opinion, look better than anyone on this forum and I can guarantee, by their WR, can outlift them. Now I havent seen everyones physiques, so its a silly comment, but you get the jist.

If I am to have a 1000hp GTR, does it have to look like a shitter? Pretty sure it can have nice paint and wheels yet still be fast. Sure, its harder to have both, but so more satisfying.

There are only 3 rules in life

1. Be aggressive

2. Be more aggressive

3. Never be satisfied

Could my guys have achieved their physique without getting stronger? Of course

Could they lift as much and look like crap? Of course

How good though to have a brilliant physique and be stronger, I suppose it makes them the kind of guys you want to avoid at parties when your chatting up chicks

Society today is what has made these 2 standout

They would be decidedly average in the 50's through to the 70's

Nothing people do or dont do today surprises me, nothing. At 51, I reckon I've seen every example of person I never want my sons to be, in and out of the gym.

On our car forums we mock guys with NA cars that are covered in bling. Amazing.

Yeah I don't entirely hate what society has become. Sucks for them, but it allows me to stand out more from the average person, with even less effort.

So I'm content with that part, but you know what properly annoys me? A good body is hard work to get, and most people know this (except those females paranoid about sprouting too much muscle). But it's not THAT hard. No, compared to all the miracle bullshit I see people slowly injecting their time, money and effort into over years and years, for little return in the way of looking, feeling or living better...it's a piece of f**kin piss.

shit cant believe i forgot dips, hmm dips or dip machine

the second set of chins is to compliment the first (because i suck donkey at chins) also more to focus on the gun show, least thats my logical way of thinking....

I've only just started doing weighted dips again the other day (f**king clip on my weight belt just snapped LOL) - used to manage +50kg for 8 reps, now I can only manage 10-11 reps of +30kg. FML.

It'll come back.

what he said!

I'm so excited about gym tonight, I'm getting that 45kg bench again. Did 3 reps of 45kg on decline on Wednesday, so my thinking is I can do at least one again on flat bench, I've done it before!

Trying for 60kg squat tonight too for the first time :)

Edited by L33SH

It'll come back.

Indeed it will - and the best part is I haven't actually lost any noticeable muscle size, which I'm hoping will mean I'm back to constantly overloading the muscles again even with less resistance than previously required.

Probably not how it works, but it's certainly back to being "difficult" and leaving the muscles tender again haha

Man, I haven't been able to train for 2 weeks now due to a bad spell of tonsillitis, and I've been doing around 2 sessions a week only previously. Some sort of illness about 6 times in 8 weeks now. Having some serious withdrawals...

Man, I haven't been able to train for 2 weeks now due to a bad spell of tonsillitis, and I've been doing around 2 sessions a week only previously. Some sort of illness about 6 times in 8 weeks now. Having some serious withdrawals...

sorry to hear that, hope you can get back into it asap.

Man, I haven't been able to train for 2 weeks now due to a bad spell of tonsillitis, and I've been doing around 2 sessions a week only previously. Some sort of illness about 6 times in 8 weeks now. Having some serious withdrawals...

I feel your pain.

I haven't been able to train properly for well over 6 weeks. Uni exams, then some weird stomach virus for about 2 weeks, then got back into it for a week and now I'm coming down with a cold.

Have gone so far backwards it aint funny.

Was squatting 140, deadlifting 170 and benching 120 (all 1rm) and now I'd be lucky to get within 20kg of any of those lifts...

You can smash the 45kg L33SH . A 1rm after volume is a sure way to introduce a poor performance. Do a warm up , then the 1rm set and you have the job done.

My caution to you is that the volume routine + a meaningful high load set/s (1rm) = rotator cuff fatigue/stress and injury potential.

Just take care with the bro-press and have fun.

Edited by rev210

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...