Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol, I was going to insert a video here of Vicki squatting 110kg tonight, but I'm a little scared bozo might put his back out throwing the computer across the room

it might help get my numbers up :D

I noticed my gym has removed some of the free weights area to make room for "true grit" classes, I suppose at least they are using barbells and doing compounds... really wish they would get a second power cage / squat rack though.

Edited by bozodos

Markos, I remember you saying not long ago that nothing you see amazes you anymore. I'm curious: what's the most impressive or amazing thing you've ever seen with regard to lifting?

Great question, but I was amazed last night.

Firstly, the hardest set I've ever witnessed was actually performed by an SAU forum member, Nick Rankin. He squatted 160kg x 20, no wraps no belt. He could easily have quit at 5, it was that hard. He hit every upright in the power rack, he was stumbling, I thought he would pass out, but he never quit.

Most impressive lift I saw in the gym was Max at 16 weighing 70kg, take out 125kg on his back like a squat, then jerk it overhead, behind his neck, stunned everyone. But next, he didnt dump the bar on the ground like most, he lowered it to his shoulders and re racked it, no belt, nothing. This was before he switched to powerlifting

Last night a guy from a Crossfit gym near town trained at PTC, he was there for over 3 hours, he foam rolled everything, including forearms, used bands to stretch every square inch of his body, it was amazing. The lifting he did was overhead squats with 25kg x 3 and push press from the rack with 25kg x 3. I've never seen anyone do less for longer

Crossfit dude might have been working on rehab/recovery? Weird otherwise.

Regarding the more's....

If I can get 8 reps out on sets 1 and 2 but say only 4-5 on set 3 (each set heavier than the one before it) and I see this trend for a good few sessions, am I "better" off (I know that's a loose term) doing more reps of the final set weight? The second set weight? A higher weight? etc.

At the moment, if I fail out at 4-5 on the final set I take a short break, then grab a few more reps at that weight, until I've done 8 total at that weight. Good approach to mores or would more weight be better?

I ask because for 3 sessions I've done the more sets at the same weight thing, to make sure I get 8 at that weight, but I'm not seeing a correspodning improvement in how many I can get out in one go on that final set, still topping out at 4-5, and I'm not racking it assuming failure on the 5th or 6th rep, I'm going for it and trying, getting half way or so, not making it, putting it on the safeties, crawling out, re-racking, going again.

I know effort is key, so im going to failure, when I take a 60sec break and can get out a few more reps, how should I go about them? Same weight, more, less etc.

The problem I see with what your doing is tracking progress.

If your getting 8 on lighter sets then 5 on the only work set youre doing, thats not much work, is it?

I'd rather see bench - 80kg x 5,5,5 than bench 60kg x 8, 70kg x 8, 80kg x 5

Hmm fair enough, I only consider the first set to be a warm up and the next 2 to be "work".

Likewise though, If I was using the same weight on all 3 sets, and going 8, 8, 5 (or 5 5 3 in your example) would you then do a few more reps at the same weight to get the full 8 (5) reps up or would you add weight to push through that plateau?

The question is what to do when the endurance isn't there, that it,s you have the power to move the weight, but would like to move it more times in one go rather than stopping/starting.

What I've done in the past is move the final set weight to the second set and added weight for the last set above what I was doing before.

The problem I see with what your doing is tracking progress.

If your getting 8 on lighter sets then 5 on the only work set youre doing, thats not much work, is it?

I'd rather see bench - 80kg x 5,5,5 than bench 60kg x 8, 70kg x 8, 80kg x 5

Since you pointed out the whole MORE thing, I now completely understand why any sets at lighter weight prior to your working sets are a waste of time. I like to do one set at a fairly bitch weight just to see if there's any joint/muscle issues before I push out the working set, but only now do I truly realise that anything short of your working weight is doing nothing but burning calories (unless you push to ridiculous failure reps or something). It won't be promoting any kind of growth since it's not MORE.

IMO (as per your example Markos) - 60x 5-8; then 80x 5,5,5,3,3,etc to however many you wanna go lol. But no point wasting energy on the initial sets, since it's just calories that could've been put towards pushing MORE than last session.

Since you pointed out the whole MORE thing, I now completely understand why any sets at lighter weight prior to your working sets are a waste of time. I like to do one set at a fairly bitch weight just to see if there's any joint/muscle issues before I push out the working set, but only now do I truly realise that anything short of your working weight is doing nothing but burning calories (unless you push to ridiculous failure reps or something). It won't be promoting any kind of growth since it's not MORE.

IMO (as per your example Markos) - 60x 5-8; then 80x 5,5,5,3,3,etc to however many you wanna go lol. But no point wasting energy on the initial sets, since it's just calories that could've been put towards pushing MORE than last session.

My thoughts exactly, I get into working sets ASAP.

My thoughts exactly, I get into working sets ASAP.

I take my sweet ass time coz I'm a big f**king girl.

Also Dan I dare say it depends on how many reps/sets you're aiming for, but regardless of whether it's 10x3 or 5x5 - whatever the max weight you can manage those reps and sets at would be your working weight. Which you WILL increase next session. Failing that, you know what to do (more reps or another set :P)

If you like to ramp the weight up and reps down, which is fine if youre not interested in absolute strength gains, then a system I prefer is the pyramid but with "control" reps up and "everything you got" on the way down.

40kg x 5

60kg x 5

80kg x 5

100kg x 5

80kg x 11

60kg x 12

40kg x 12

Too many reps, take too long as I do a full body routine 3x a week so 3 sets is about all I have time for on each thing.

Squat, Bench, DL, Bent Row, Weighted Chins, Weighted Dips.

3x8 with 2min breaks takes about an hour.

Would there be much benefit in going 3x5 and going heavier? I'm happy to get stronger, but not looking to get any bigger or heavier (I have a race suit and seat that I need to fit in). I realise calorie intake is part of that.

Edited by ActionDan

But its NOT 3 x 8 if you only do 1-2 work sets, 3 sets with the same weight is the correct way, 1-2 sets is crap if youre not going to absolute positive failure every set, and I know youre not doing that because you train alone.

A couple of sets at 80% is not enough work to improve unfortunately

What does positive failure mean? I am going til failure on the 3rd and any subsequent sets.

That is, I know I won't make another rep but I go for it and fail out on the way back up (using bench as example)

Ok...

Well I'm going to regular people failure on every set at the highest weight I do I do as many sets as needed to ensure I've done at least 8 reps at that weight, for every exercise.

But I see that I'm better off doing one warmup set and doing all my sets at that weight.

Failure is a state of mind, too deep for this thread or forum even.

Is it the point where quite simply put, the muscles you're pushing just switch off? As I've only pushed to what I'd consider absolute failure once or twice, and as an example one of these occasions was dumbbell press - the point at which I failed, my left arm was going to absolute jelly, shaking like crazy etc etc, then after what seemed like a lifetime (probably a few seconds of barely moving up, but not going down), it felt as though my arm just switched off and went limp, causing me to bounce the 34kg DB off my chest lol

Is that absolute failure? I mean, as far as I'm concerned without proper mental training there was no way I was completing that rep.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • You’re all still going on about track cars, he has said multiple times doesn’t intend to take it to the track,  just stick to what was said at the beginning and do the pump and ecu, it’ll get you enough for 230kw at the wheels and has enough poke to be fun for what you want it for 
    • All of that is absolutely true. At any time in the history of these turbos the lottery has always been that it could die at stock boost treated exactly as the factory intended, or it could die when pushed to 10, or 12, or 14, or 16 psi, after a short time, or a longer time, or it could last seemingly forever. You have the combination of all the possible statistical (probably) normal distributions of manufacturing tolerances and quality outcomes, on top of the statistical distributions of failure modes (which might be normal, but are probably biased, like Poisson distributions). You get the lucky turbo and you can beat on it for years. You get the really unlucky turbo and it will crap itself as it rolls out of the factory gate. And every possibility in between. But you can definitely still kill the lucky turbo. It's just that most people didn't try, once they knew they really shouldn't try.
    • Maybe I have Stockholm syndrome but working on an M2 isn't that hard. Getting parts cheaply and quickly is hard, but getting parts same day isn't necessarily hard if you're willing to pay way too much for it at local dealers. There's a lot going on, you need to have a build of ISTA on a laptop and the right cable, if you don't have the mindset of "do it exactly right or not at all" you will probably start seeing cascading failures. Skylines are a little more tolerant in that regard. The car doesn't potentially trash itself if you bought the wrong oil filter like a BMW would. Or trash the entire cylinder head and potentially spin a bearing because someone took the anti-drainback valve out of the plastic oil filter cap. An M2 will also do just fine on track, zero oil starvation concerns, factory brakes are great if you change the pads for a high temp compound + flush with track-ready fluid.
    • The "ideal/formula" that used to be touted was death of the turbo is going to be caused by a combination of 3 things. Heat Speed of turbo (boost level you're pushing) Time   Basically, you can get away with high heat and high boost for short periods. But start doing long hard pulls, or circuit driving etc, and now you've increased time as well which will shred things. From memory when Adrian was drag racing he was running 17psi, on a stock turbo, and running insane speeds. But he also had other additives helping in the setup too. Some people have success at 14psi for a while, while others due to pushing the cars hard for long periods opt down to lower temps. But also, generate a lot of heat (let's say bad tune), for a long time, and you'll be okay, until you try to spin that little guy up slightly. It's the one advantage of dumping a lot of fuel in, you'll be reducing EGT a bit and helping with the heat portion of the above 3 areas.   And these days, stock turbos are that old that there's the possibility of just outright failures due to material age. I'm not shocked that even when used in factory spec that a stock turbo fails when 30 years old. It's a worn out "precision" "balanced" performance item, that's likely no longer precise, or well balanced
    • this... hence I said what I said previously, SMSP nights you see mainly Hondas, Evos, A90s, F80x and the odd VW. The 5 or 6 times I went, I only saw 1x R32 GT-R, and other than that I was the only one in a shit box Skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...