Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah I'm still a bit torn between Simplest Strength and BBB as Simplest Strength calls for 3x10 sets of ab and lower back work twice a week, and many respected coaches say that situps and back extensions are bad for your back (most of the fancier stuff like ab wheel rollouts I don't have access to and not strong enough for hanging leg raises).

yeah I'm still a bit torn between Simplest Strength and BBB as Simplest Strength calls for 3x10 sets of ab and lower back work twice a week, and many respected coaches say that situps and back extensions are bad for your back (most of the fancier stuff like ab wheel rollouts I don't have access to and not strong enough for hanging leg raises).

do situps bending at the hip holding the core straight, sliding hands up to the knees, holding and back down. not crunches,

you will feel it in your lower abdominals more.

Do side bends, or torso twists with a bar.

condition is called Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricle Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy or ARVD/ARVC for short.

It is a heard condition that effects the right centricle, bascially the ventricle increases in size until a point where the heart just stops. Commonly found in athletes that die suddenly for no apparent reason.

What they believe is that high levels of exercise especially stuff where your heart rate spikes and lowers and spikes some more (HIIT training is another no no) stresses and effects the heart differently to people with the condition compared to people without it.

do situps bending at the hip holding the core straight, sliding hands up to the knees, holding and back down. not crunches,

you will feel it in your lower abdominals more.

Do side bends, or torso twists with a bar.

Could also plank, normal and side. 100% contraction, compared to top 1/3 for a situp/crunch and no negative impact to the back.

V-sits on a bench are good, as are leg raises with legs overhanging the end of the bench.

Links?

I'm eager to hear the opposing view point from genuinely knowledgeable people, not keyboard warriors.

I take the mouse thing with a grain of salt. A friend of mine, in Melbourne, works in a lab that uses mice for cancer research, the positive effects of that research have translated to humans so saying a test was done on a mouse as a reason for dismissing it is pretty stupid, a lot of testing is done on animals before it goes to human trials.

it's more the fact that it's a correlative rather than causative study- the comments I found were in discussion of the Guardian article of pretty much the exact same thing.

I used to get wound up by these things, but there's so many health benefits attributed directly to high protein diets that I find this sort of stuff to be quite alarmist.

I think the important thing to look at with these sorts of studies is the metadata - i.e. were some of the mice obese, sedentary or active? What sort of diet were they fed specifically?

It's no secret that many of the world's oldest living cultures have a carb heavy protein light diet - check out Alan Aragon's dissection of Paleo here - he goes into this phenomena in some detail http://www.nsca.com/uploadedFiles/NSCA/Inactive_Content/Program_Books/PTC_2013_Program_Book/Aragon.pdf

Age old saying right, "Everything in moderation"?

Atkins is great way to shed bodyfat but I personally wouldn't use it year round. I don't know about you guys but when I'm on a low carb diet I eat heaps of veg, particularly greens, so it's not like the diet is completely skewed towards protein it still needs to be rounded.

I am of course am a health/nutrition noob.

In the end if you want to gain muscle your protein intake needs to support that. Get big and die trying seems accurate

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Given by the sheer number of questions about offset, absolutely not. If you had the information formatted this way: Space from R34 GTT hub to outer arch = 100mm Space from R34 GTT inner hub to nearest suspension arm = 90mm. (making this up) Buying a wheel that was advertised as Enkei RPZ5 Diameter 18in Width 9 Distance to arch = 84mm Distance to suspension arm = 76mm 100% of people would know instantly if it fits. They would absolutely also know instantly how close it fits too, and no questions would need to be asked. You would know you would have 16mm from the guard and 14mm from the suspension arm.
    • Ah ok, for example for the apexi ecu I heard that it's pretty limited with the information it can give you. Also not sure why Nissan used the consult port over the obd2, what the idea there was.
    • Diagnosing with and without is mostly the same. You need to know, as Duncan asked, and what conditions. Car hot, cold, idling, driving, if while driving what rpms, is when you're varying, or is it when held constant.   From there it's understanding what can be causing it. Starting with pretending all of the sensors are correct. Which means if it's going rich, why would it be thinking more air is going in than it is, and under what conditions. So things like if only when under boost, it could be be a loose intake piping joint. It's just understanding the system, and understanding when/how the problem occurs, and then if it's only occuring in specific scenarios, what can be causing it.   ECU specifically, if it's aftermarket, it'll have software you can use, for the Skylines on factory ECU, there is Nissan Consult you can use. Most ECUs have a way to get data from them.
    • How do you go about diagnosing ecu's that don't have data logging, is it more experience at that point and just trying out things that you think will fix the issue?
    • Stock O2 are basically useless beyond anything at stoich. Any misfire will also be seen as lean. The stock O2 also read a collective exhaust gas volume, not each cylinder. Sputtering and missing means not each cycle is firing, and some are. Which means even if rich, as shit, on cylinders as they miss, they'll read lean, but the cylinders that did fire will read rich, and combined, well, they can read anything from rich to lean.   Start with the basics before even going looking at sensor values.   Edit: I say the above, and that's coming from the guy with a few thousand dollars worth of scan tools sitting right beside me right now that I use frequently for my job.
×
×
  • Create New...