Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cardio and the right diet would be more effective.

yer im very skeptical bout this kind of stuff...

but the reviews ive read are really convincing while others ppl say its not that great.

just wondering if anyone has had it/taken it? and what they rekon?

there is a health food store near me that sells it ..

its really only the caffeine in it that helps though ... it helps to raise your resting metabolic rate

when I diet if I want an extra edge I use no-doze caffeine pills ... you can get 100 for like $20 or less from your local chemist ...

pop 2~4 b4 cardio and 2~4 before you push weight and you'll notice a big difference!

there is a health food store near me that sells it ..

its really only the caffeine in it that helps though ... it helps to raise your resting metabolic rate

when I diet if I want an extra edge I use no-doze caffeine pills ... you can get 100 for like $20 or less from your local chemist ...

pop 2~4 b4 cardio and 2~4 before you push weight and you'll notice a big difference!

finally a helpfull post....

oh ok thanks mate, will try that :blink:

cheers

*thread close*

there is a health food store near me that sells it ..

its really only the caffeine in it that helps though ... it helps to raise your resting metabolic rate

when I diet if I want an extra edge I use no-doze caffeine pills ... you can get 100 for like $20 or less from your local chemist ...

pop 2~4 b4 cardio and 2~4 before you push weight and you'll notice a big difference!

However if u want an even bigger edge go for the no-doze plus..theyre a bit more expensive than normal ones but they give u a whollop of energy :domokun:

Edited by vinnie34gtt
lol @ using caffine pill in place of an energy supplement... (no-doz ftw!)

ive been using bsn no-explode as an energy supplement...thats some crazy stuff aye.

so i take it noone has used it lol

I had good success with the EAS 'BetaLean' product back in 2005... They don't make it anymore but they've replaced it with something else..

'Dynamx' or something like that... I'd reccommend it, but you need a good diet and adequate exercise to go with it...

Gaspari nutrition has one called Cytolean, is the best iv found atm, tried hardcore, lipo 6, tried to get a new lipo 6 product in but customs took it :thumbsup: next time il be going ECA, see how that works.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...