Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

lol its ok to take a wing off but its not cool to have the holes left behind when the wings taken off.... if ur gonna take it off get ur boot bogged n resprayed so theres no holes....

that's why i brought rubber grommets for mine, so that if one day i decide to put the ugly standard spoiler back on i still can. or you can do dori spec duct/gaffa tape haha.

In answer to the original post....."BECAUSE I f**kING CAN" :)

But its true the spoiler does actually have a purpose. If u cant find a wind tunnel and u really wanna see jus stick 6" strands of wool all over ur car and drive behind it. Or alternatively get the book 21st century performance...some pics of this in action.

I have submitted the case for r32 GTR's international heritage listing to the appropriate governing bodies and am awaiting a reply(the case looks strong).

If passed all modified road cars must be returned to stock where feasible, any further/future modifications must be submitted in triplicate to the board and passed through a 3 panel approval process, With some of the more culturally significant examples they will be confiscated and housed in an enormous plastic bubble where you will be allowed to occasionally view your car for a nominal cost.

Enough silliness....if you own it you have the right to turn it into any abomination you please.....hell set it ablaze and dance naked around the furgler for all myself and anyone else should care. :)

Edited by madbung
GTR owners touting 'practicality is king', seems to me like camry owners saying 'the performance is outstanding' hehe.

No the camry owners saying 'the performance is outstanding' is like a Gtst owner saying ' it's more practical than a GTR..' ........practical performance like a camry that is. :D

when i purchased mine i was a big fan of the wingless 32gtr,hence me buying one wingless...but as ive had the car for longer and longer i wanted a wing.so im in the progress of getting one pinted up to chuck back on there...

post-19779-1200634599_thumb.jpg

my 33 GTR will be wingless soon because i feel like it :D

the boot lid with the gtr wing will be replaced with the spare boot lid I have with a ducktail on it so it wont have any holes or will look like its missing something.

when i purchased mine i was a big fan of the wingless 32gtr,hence me buying one wingless...but as ive had the car for longer and longer i wanted a wing.so im in the progress of getting one pinted up to chuck back on there...

post-19779-1200634599_thumb.jpg

That looks pretty frigging good! Mine looks like that, but I want like mudflaps, the sort that mold into the bumper, sorta like an add on like what you can do with the R33 GTR's. Kinda tops it off I guess.

What those rims you got?

Edited by (00)SKYLINE(00)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...