Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im considering to get a kit for my gtt r34, but im in a dilemma whether to go nismo kit or do-luck front bar, bomex side and rear???

wat do u guys think??? few of guys on sau have the kits ive mentioned if u guys don't know wat they look like...

the do-luck/bomex kit is hot, very agressive, i plan on buying that when i get the $$, sometime, in the distant future, the nismo one is nice, its more streamlined i think, more along the factory lines...

ur choice, mine would be do-luck/bomex

I would go Nismo with extra (separate) lip - Do-luck sideskirts and a put a GTR wing on.

Nice... then of course get nice 18" rims, dump it down a bit and you're set...

all looks abit to crazy for me.

I like simple, but effective. Its the way ive tried to go for all my cars.

Im keeping my standard front bar with the added lip, nismo skirts and maybe impul real. That will give me lower lines but nothing that stands out trying to be too loud :)

Here is my front bar, it may be something to consider. Not as crazy as bomex, but not at common as the nismo shark looking one.

sdfna1.jpg

here is the crappiest quality pic ever

and another

image379rv4.jpg

it may not be your style but i just thought i would throw the option out there :)

Edited by Granthem

Haha yeh that was a progress shot... wanted to see the difference it makes. here are some newer ones :D they show the front bar abit better

34nospoiler013gm0.jpg

34nospoiler015lx8.jpg

I do like the Do luck front, but i feel it would be too out there with my sideskirts and rear bar im planning. So i decided to keep with this route and see how it ends up. Might eventually go do luck. It creates such a big mouth on the 34!

wow the do luck is quite hot there, and bomex sides are nice as with the rear. im leaning way more on do luck with bomex kit for sho!!!!

btw granthem are ur hid bulbs 6000K ones?

Edited by 10MinuteCar
Haha yeh that was a progress shot... wanted to see the difference it makes. here are some newer ones :( they show the front bar abit better

34nospoiler013gm0.jpg

34nospoiler015lx8.jpg

I do like the Do luck front, but i feel it would be too out there with my sideskirts and rear bar im planning. So i decided to keep with this route and see how it ends up. Might eventually go do luck. It creates such a big mouth on the 34!

Classy and WAY TOO HOT!!!!

Haha yeh that was a progress shot... wanted to see the difference it makes. here are some newer ones :worship: they show the front bar abit better

34nospoiler013gm0.jpg

34nospoiler015lx8.jpg

I do like the Do luck front, but i feel it would be too out there with my sideskirts and rear bar im planning. So i decided to keep with this route and see how it ends up. Might eventually go do luck. It creates such a big mouth on the 34!

Hey Granthem, who makes the eyelids you have on your GTT? They fit nice.

Hey Granthem, who makes the eyelids you have on your GTT? They fit nice.

Hey mate, they are fibreglass C West style. Unfortuntely I'm not sure where they were purchased from however, because I picked them up off the forums brand new but second hand

I do however know they can be purchased off www.carmate.com (an aus site) however I have heard mixed reviews about their quality. I can find out where they were purchased from orignially if you would like though?

Edited by Granthem

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...