Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ive just finnished converting my setup from the trust TD-06 20G with the 16c rear housing, to a garret GT3040R with a .63 rear housing

i also installed hks 264 9.1 cams with adj cam gears

for its first tune it made 346rwhp @22psi, but comes on almost 1000rpm earlier in the rev range! compared to when my car had the 405 hp tune with the td06, it actualy feels alot faster to drive now, this is all on a std head/bottom end

the gt35r will be a bit too big imo as for driveability, my recomendation is the garret gt3040

good luck

Adam

ive just finnished converting my setup from the trust TD-06 20G with the 16c rear housing, to a garret GT3040R with a .63 rear housing

i also installed hks 264 9.1 cams with adj cam gears

for its first tune it made 346rwhp @22psi, but comes on almost 1000rpm earlier in the rev range! compared to when my car had the 405 hp tune with the td06, it actualy feels alot faster to drive now, this is all on a std head/bottom end

the gt35r will be a bit too big imo as for driveability, my recomendation is the garret gt3040

good luck

Adam

haha i would not even contemplate using the 16 rear housing on a rotary.... it is way to big :( not a viable comparison. Fit a 1.0 housing to the GT3040 then it would be a closer comparo ;)

i had the TD05-20g 14 on my rb25 and even it was way to laggy for me here are the recommended sizes;

10 for rb25 and 8 for rb20... 10 on a rb20 if you want high 200's.

I still think the 20G is a great turbo for an RB20. The 2835 woudl be interesting, its just that no one seems to run them.

Re the 20G, i have run up to 20psi and there is no way my thing will ever get near 300rwkws. Even with cams etc? I havent seen that sort of power on a 25 let alone a 20, even with cams etc. Maybe if they were running a larger housing like AD4M is?!?!?!?

CRD do a good deal on them.

If your looking for heaps of power but not really interested in goodpower and more response get the .82 if u want a neck snapping response but with a little under 300kw.. get .63 id only get .82 if i had cams and a fully built engine or a 3L

I still think the 20G is a great turbo for an RB20. The 2835 woudl be interesting, its just that no one seems to run them.

Re the 20G, i have run up to 20psi and there is no way my thing will ever get near 300rwkws. Even with cams etc? I havent seen that sort of power on a 25 let alone a 20, even with cams etc. Maybe if they were running a larger housing like AD4M is?!?!?!?

for some reason it is only the L2 20g that will stretch into the 290-300rwkw range the S 20g wont come close unfortunately. I have customer / good family friend with an evo 6.5 TME (soon to be in hpi) making over 300awkw with a L2-20g (record for l2) on two separate nsw dyno's. and 2 customers with rb20's making 268-274rwkw at only 1.2ish bar. The S-20g tends to fall over at anything above 1.25-1.3bar. i reckon the L2 is like a T67 with 7/10ths the lag :D

I reckon no-one uses the HKS 2835 (0.61 56t) but us... because it is dear and difficult to source.

most of my customers tend to want 250-290rwkw with maximum response in thier sr's and rb's and taking a quick look and talking to many D1 teams it is easy to see why 9 out of the top 10 run greddy 06 or 67 variants because they offer the best balance between response and power and delivery is unique.

For 25 owners (wanting 280rwkw) i will post a T67 (8cm) vs gt3540 comparo that was done today up here 2moro..... very interesting and proves my point that bigger and less boost is backwards thinking. Final result was 10rwkw less up top but 40rwkw more through out the mid and only started to taper off right up top all at 1.15bar versus 1.2 with the 3540. Next test is 10cm housing on the T67 versus 8cm to guge exact response difference and peak power limit of it on a std (internal) rb25. i hazard to guess 320rwkw 1.2-1.3bar and 20rwkw throughout the whole rpm range over the 3540.

So the S 20G makes less power, but what is the trade off? Is the L2 any less responsive? What is the difference in the turbine? Number of blades, the pitch of blades, the diameter of the turbine?

LOL, sorry about all the questions :)

haha no stress, the L2 actually runs a smaller exhaust wheel 61mm compared to the 06S-20g (65mm) but the blade profile is totally differrent. It is the same as a T67. The compressor (front wheel) is identicle on 06S and L2. The L2 is rated to 430ps (which is nearly spot on what we squezed out of the EVO, i cannot match this with any NISSAN engine yet the best i can get is 400ps or just shy of 300kw) with an 8cm the 06S is rated the same but needs a 12cm housing to meet the max therefore becomes laggier. I cannot explain the L2 it is bit of a freak, all i can put it down to is the aggressive pitch and fewer blade setup on the l2.

haha yeah but remmeber you would be in a 31....(hides from wheezy)..... 1.5bar and 4000rpm aint exactly anything to write home about...

from all i know (very little) about the GTS-r (std rated 210 but actually closer to 260) is that 300hp is around the limit and anything above that requires alot of work including high flowing the turbo to GRP A specs, cams and the rods and pistons are known to be the limiting factor also. 260rwkw plus is well beyond what i have ever seen qouted with 220-240rwkw being the norm... even from R31 house in japan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Mate you saved be from dying in the Perth summer. AC wasn't changing direction and just going into diagnostics mode fixed it. You're a legend and I would shout you a beer if I could!
    • Unfortunately effort gone to waste, you will have substantial issues with how the manifold and wastegate have been integrated. You would be so much better off with a modified stock manifold like this: https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25detexgatedmanifold/   OR literally just getting a off the shelf Sinco or 6Boost manifold as myself and others have mentioned.  
    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
×
×
  • Create New...