Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, please see pics below, when adjusting timing on the cam gears, which part of the hole needs to be corresponding to the timing mark itself (does the hole need to be in the middle of the mark, or the hole need to line up to the edge of that gear tooth? the pics below will explain much more clearly, please tell me which way is correct for lining up.

Thanks:)

post-6529-1200818579_thumb.jpg

post-6529-1200818594_thumb.jpg

hole lines up to the mark (figure A). the timing belt will sort of force you to get the right place though because the distance between the 2 gears is fixed by the length of the timing belt between the 2 gears. Put the belt on and you will see you can only get option A.

Thanks, so basically with my new greddy timing belt, the lines shoud match up perfect from the belt to the timing marks on the cam gear cover??

Also, with the new belt, how do i know which line corresponds to which cam gear, or timing mark?, i can roughly see it myself (imaginin it linig up)

Edited by nsta

yes, and once the belt is over both gears you will see they both line up to the marks (or you are a whole tooth out).

Once you've put the belt on, rotate the motor a time or 2 to make sure everything is clearing OK.

The lines on the belt are there only to assist you to fit the belt on and when you spin the engine a few times they will NOT line up again . You will notice the lines on the belt are at different lenghs, place the belt near its possition and you will see how it should go.

Tha main thing is to line up the cam gears with the marks on the backing plate and the crank gear must line up with its mark at the same time . Make sure you have a good tensioner ( I like to use a new one) and the carrect tension on the belt .

Thanks im doing it for the first time, i understand that its the cam gear and crank gear marking plate that needs to be lined up perfect, but as per the first question, if i need to line them up as they are in figure one thats what i'll do.if figure 2 is wrong then ill change immediately, as thats how its lined up currently, but i was unsure so i didnt go any further.

As for the crank gear marking, i was told you line up the leftmost line on the gear (or the most anticlockwise one) to the timing mark, mine is coloured orange....is this correct?

How do we remove the crank pulley???also when lining up all the marks, is it ok to do it without the belt on, so that when all the mark are aligned, i can just chuck new belt on and crank the engine by hand to do a final adjustment.

Thanks.

Edited by nsta

no, the crank gear should be lined up before you put the balancer back on, like the cam gears. the crank gear has 1 dot on a tooth which you line up with the mark on the oil pump. Once the balancer is on (and therefore the belt is in place) you can turn it to wherever you want. The orange mark is 0o BTDC for checking base timing with a timing light - this is affected by the position of the crank angle sensor not the timing belt.

I hope you don't have the timming belt off, you should take the balancer off first and then you take off the covers . Once you take the belt off you can't go turning the crank or the cams, if you do you may bent a valve or few. A few degree movement if ok .

I can't understand how you can take the belt off without removing the harmonic balancer if you have . If you never done a timming belt before be very carefull , you can do a lot of damage to your engine if you don't do it right. Follow the workshop manual step by step and if you are not sure then ask away .

As Duncan said the marks on the harmonic balancer are for ignition timming, not valve timming .

These can be a bastard to pull off, the nut is very tight and you can't even use a rattle gun unless you have the air con condenser out. I use the starter to undo the nut and then you need a gear puller to pull the balancer off, whatever you dont use a hammer or a claw gear puller ( you will damage the balancer ).

I don't understand what you asking in the first post ( Duncan does ), how about when you put the belt on put a pic of the front of the engine showing all the marks then I can tell you if you have it right. like I said its the gear marks that have to line up not the belt marks.

Now im very worried, basically the belt is off from the top two cam gears (but not down the bottom at the balancer)...as i jst done a head gasket replacement.....and the head needed to be off

Before i placed the head back on, we got the crank pulley bolt right out (the 30mm one i think it is), but didnt remove the pulley off or the cover, as i had no balancer removal tools available).

Am i in trouble?

Now im very worried, basically the belt is off from the top two cam gears (but not down the bottom at the balancer)...as i jst done a head gasket replacement.....and the head needed to be off

Before i placed the head back on, we got the crank pulley bolt right out (the 30mm one i think it is), but didnt remove the pulley off or the cover, as i had no balancer removal tools available).

Am i in trouble?

Not at all, you only told us half the story.

As the head is off you can turn the bottom as much as you like, no valves to hit!!!!

You did the right thing by taking the bolt off, now all you need to do is take the balancer off , you will see two treaded holes on the balancer , so you need a gear puller to and 2 m8 bolts, if you are in Sydney and you want to travel to the hills area I will lent you nine if you like as long as its a boomerang.

Hey thanks for the offer:), i still think im in trouble mate, we loosen that bolt and its right off(the 30mm one), we done this before putting the head back on....the head is already back on, and the bottom timing was not setup, and the top cam gears timing was aligned once the head was on!!!, the crank was turned by hand when the head was off only so the bolt would come out....

Im scared of what im hearing now....

Edited by nsta

Is there a possibility of the valves being bent as the head has been put back on without the timing on the crank or cams being set?, even though the motor has not been started???, i need some advice, i dnt want to hear it but i may have to...im picturing the pistos crushing the valves that me be have been in contact when the head was slapped on....could i be on the right path???or does it take alot more revolutions for the valves to bend etc?ie the motor starting up and idling.....

Edited by nsta

Here we go slowly we are getting the full story , how about telling us exacly what you have done fron the start to now , step by step EXACLY and don't leave anything out even if you don't think it matters, then and only then I maybe able to guide you on what to do.

Is there a possibility of the valves being bent as the head has been put back on without the timing on the crank or cams being set?, even though the motor has not been started???, i need some advice, i dnt want to hear it but i may have to...im picturing the pistos crushing the valves that me be have been in contact when the head was slapped on....could i be on the right path???or does it take alot more revolutions for the valves to bend etc?ie the motor starting up and idling.....

If there was any interference, I doubt the head would have gone back on. So you shouldn't have bent valves at that point.

So, it will be possible to align the bottom and top ends. You can V E E R R R Y S L O W L Y turn the crank. If you strike ANY resistance, STOP. Check which pistons are near TDC (a long screwdriver through the spark plug hole works well), and check which valves are fully open. Then jiggle the cams so that the valves are no longer fully open on the pistons at TDC. Again, ANY resistance, STOP; work out where the interference is happening.

Failing that, you are probably going to have to pull the head, and do it again ... properly (hint - RTFM).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...