Jump to content
SAU Community

Project R35 Gtr Targa Preparation - Progress Pics


Just Jap Racing

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah my guess is it would run close to standard weight anyway. I mean sure you can remove standard heavy seats etc.

but then add an approved cage, extinguishers, terra-trip, terra-phone etc etc and you are back where you started. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that video of the GTR assembly line is kool. i work for holden's and i'm pretty sure we don't put that sorta time and effort into our cars but i guess we're making a hell of a lot more neway.

yer another holdens boy here arvos/body shop

Jut wondering any chance the gtr will make it to clipsal, i just want a looks thats all, even tho the veyron,zonda,konigsiegg (spelling) ect ect will be there i wanna see the gtr!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, we're right on the limit at 1600 odd kg, what tyres it turns up on will be interesting. If it's dry for most of it, it's touch and go re tyres lasting for us, and i assume the 35 will be the same, but at the end of the day everyone's in the same boat. Make 'em last or cop the penalty. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet i know where that is on its way too :D so i called around the other day i was right very very NICE !!!!!some good work there boys i dont like pink but !i do NOW, it looks tops in real life keep up the good work

Fitzy

Agreed Marlin... every forum I'm on has "wow I spotted a R35 GTR today" thread... they spotted the Just Jap one around 11am this morning :laugh:

aV2CQMKA.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can't comment enough on how good this thing looks.

I am now begging:

"Beat Porsche - Bloody Win!!!!!!! Or at least get to Day5 - I will be on 1 of the 99 bends out of Queenstown, I would really like to watch/photo the team Donut King R35 going through this unreal section"

"Watch out for ice/snow" - good luck,

Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike, bugger Queenstown, get yourself onto the Very fast sweepers around the middle of Mt Arrowsmith where it opens onto the plains and over bridges. If it's not doing 280+ there I'll, well, I don't know what I'll do but I'll be really suprised :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no what a pain. Stop for someone?

Jason and I had a phat time chasing down Ayers in his 33 in 2006 in the area I describe above :D Two GTR's going at it at the top end of 5th :D

It was like something out of GranTurismo at Trial Mountain or something..... but so much.... realerer! And awesome! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we had to stop for an accident, and there were like 10 cars already stopped and blocking the road (even though one 1 is ment to stay with the crash!) so we drive in convoy to the end.

Hope to get all the way through this year :banana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah well the crew get weighed and the car goes over a weigh bridge at least once during competition.

I haven't actually checked the rules for Moderns, but I thought it stated minimum weight could be "factory weight less 10% plus 47 kg for safety equipement/cage etc.

Now, wouldn't that get a 35 around 1610kg odd? Like I said, I haven't actually checked the rule, so i could have just wasted your time in reading this :thumbsup: sucker!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it used to be -5% + 43kg back under LMS, but now M1 and M2 are factory + 43kg, M3 is -5% + 43kg now.

(a) the minimum weight must be in accordance with the manufacturers original specifications, provided either by details obtained from the following Government web site http://rvcs-prodweb.dot.gov.au/ (for vehicles listed), homologation/recognition papers, workshop manuals or sales specifications (in that order of priority).

This weight will be deemed to include all liquid tanks to be at the normal operating levels as foreseen by the vehicle manufacturer.

(b) Minimum competition weight for M1 and M2 will be established by taking the minimum weight as established in (a), plus 43kg (for tools, jack, one spare wheel and safety equipment). For M3, the minimum competition weight shall be established by taking the minimum weight as established in (a), less 5%, plus 43kg.

Edited by sav man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...