Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all.

Slowly figuring out what i want in my new pc.

Sadly i don't know much about them.

I currently have 2 options for my processor.

A Intel Quad Core 2.4Ghz with 1066mhz bus

and

a Intel Core 2 Duo 3.0ghz with 1333mhz bus

I don't know what the "bus" thing actually does, all i know is, its the speed at which it sends information to like the ram and stuff?

What i'm trying to find out is which is faster? Which would be better for me?

Let me know.

Thanks

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

u do realise that ur comp wont utilise the full 4 gig of ram, if ur runnin xp itll only use a max of 2 gig and if ur runnin vista itll be able to use up to 3 gig... other than that it wont make much of a difference running more unless the comp is a server or something... :P

the quad would be better imo, there shoulod be some decent ones around now... good luck

thanks for that stephen.

I clearly didn't know.

It'll run vista ultimate on a 8600GT 512mb.

4gb only cause it comes with the pack. It can't hurt :P

Only one quad from intel? Q6600?

I think that'll be worth while, quad is the future, duo is the past.

yeh i got a duo only cos the quads were too expensive and the only cheap quad wasnt worth it, this was 6-8 months ago, but i did get an 8600gt too, runs games very nicely, sounds like youll have a nice lil package there :P

I would go the Core 2 Quad (G0 Stepping), I have one myself. If you're a bit technically minded, it doesn't take much at all to get the Core 2 Quad to run at around the 3GHz mark.

You'll find that a quad core is going to be a lot better as more applications are starting to take advantage of multi-threading capabilities.

Make sure you get more than 2GB of RAM...

I've got 2GB and Vista uses half of it just to run basic functions, generally, if your gonna be gaming, most games require more than 1GB for themselves...

Just a thought.

Go get the feb(latest) issue of PC users magazine, it will answer all your questions for $8. I wish it was out before i built my comp a few months ago. it will basically tell you that you have to match your RAM speed to your FSB otherwise your just throwing money away buying faster RAM than your FSB can handle, basically if they are not matched one will always be waiting for the other to catch up.

It will tell you to go and buy the cheapest CPU out of the respected intel family and overclock it, it will tell you to NOT use vista when trying to play crysis because it will run like poo,

On the cover CD there is a patch to give you all the vista options whilst running it on XP and run heaps faster,

It will tell you that more than 2gig is just a wank unless you have vista and like having 200 tabs of SAU forums open at once, :D

(or a 64bit OS), or maybe some profesh photoshop/video editing/ CAD applications.

it will tell you quad processing is a bit of a wank, esp for games, most apps don't utilise it, maybe some encoding but thats about it, you are better off using a dual core with a faster clock speed.

It will tell you that the current direct X10 video cards aren't doing there job (and compare the best value ones).

It has heaps of motherboard and CPU comparisons. And no i dont work for the magazine, i was jsut reading it last nite and found the info really relevant to what is being discussed on this page.

Also disproves all the bullsh#t i was fed at computer stores by misinformed staff when i was building my system a few months ago.

well said. Good Mag to read :-)

Ok quad core is the core for the future, games such as supreme commander are currently utilisiing this through vista so i would say for the future then yes, however performance wise at the moment to suit current games then the core 2 duos take the price, great overclocking speed etc, plus with some of the newer water cooling systems coming out the world is your oyster :-)

So for current games then go the dual core, if you want performance with future gaming in mind the quad maybe the best for the future (please note PC user mag also recommended this aswell)

Please dont get quad just to make vista happy..... with the next release of windows i am hoping it runs a lot more smoother as industry wide vista is known as a memory chewer!!!!

There are some nice advertised systems on the net at the moment, one of the ones i like can be found here:

http://www.netplus.com.au check out their advertised system page and look at their setup on the right, very nice setup for the price.

Now if your really into gaming and pcs check out this cool site, they even sell caffeine chewies and sh*T like that for full on gamer nights:-):

www.pccasegear.com.au

any other good sights you guys have seen for good cheap systems???? if so post em up.

Hope i have helped answered your questions a bit owgasm, some great feedback so far from everyone in this thread

A 64 Bit OS is really required to run 4GB of RAM, though don't expect everything to run on a 64 Bit OS if you plan on running it as a primary OS.

Vista will be better once it matures and programs/games are built around it. Just like the transition from 98 to XP. Vista actually multiple threads and CPU cycles better than XP does (an article on AtomicMPC explains this better). Hence why a Quad Core CPU would be better value than a Dual Core once applications really start to take advantage of the multiple cores. Also particularly with quads being a lot better value than they were half a year ago, the demand for applications / games to better utilise them is now higher and would put more pressure on developers to take advantage of it.

Vista is required for DX10 gaming, though I believe that an update for DX 9 would basically emulate DX10? It's been a while I've been in the PC Gaming/Enthusiast scene so that may need a bit of clarification. For now I would use XP where possible for gaming due to the lower system usage..though if your a bit of a techy you'll know that there are a lot of ways to make Vista run a lot more efficiently and disable a lot of things that you may not need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...