Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I've done some research and I want to buy a GT-RS turbo.

However, I was concerened about the lag issue.

Could the people who have a GT-RS turbo tell me when they hit full boost (at what RPM) and what boost they are running?

I am aiming to get around 240RWKW from my car.

Current mods include:

Full 3.5" straight through exhaust

GReddy Front mount intercooler

Splitfire coil packs

Power FC

Bosch 040 Fuel pump

Cold air intake system with pod and heat shield

Boost controller set to 12 PSI.

Currently, my car is putting out 195 RWKW with the current mods. Should I be able to reach 240 RWKW with the GT-RS with bigger injectors (550 CC)?

I've also read about the HKS 2530 but I read that it only could pull out about 220 RWKW. Is there a turbo that is in between the GT-RS and the HKS 2530 and that isn't so laggy?

Cheers!

This was on my previous set-up (rb25)

- Tomei cams

- Head porting

- std exhaust manifold

- std plenum

- 3" turbo-back exhaust

- 550cc inj

- Wolf3D V4 ecu

- and all other supporting mods

(ignore the red line)

post-1811-1201344981_thumb.jpg

post-1811-1201345137_thumb.jpg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...