Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What boost level are you running and what knock/ping level do you have?

I've got spikes of 130 if I hammer it [foot all the way down] in say fourth gear and 3-3500 rpm, 80 to 130km/h overtaking maneouvre, doesn't happen in 3rd, I'm running at 1.2 bar. I've seen it twice now, so it's definitely out there.

I was wondering if anyone else has this problem?

If I drive it normal and ease the power on a bit more progressively, I'm lucky to see a knock level of 10 to 15.

Std 2.5 motor, fmic, power fc, hks cast low mount extrude honed, hks 40mm wastegate 18psi spring, 550 injectors, split dump, tomei 256/8.5 cams, hks hyper exhaust, pod, sard fpr, z32, boss cat, nismo pump etc etc. 275rwkw.

I was wondering if its tune, too high boost level, or because of a fuel starvation [need a surge tank, long shot this one].

I would prefer not to have to touch the motor [thick head gasket, forgies etc].

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203430-knock-levels-on-a-garrett-gt3076-wg/
Share on other sites

what sort of afr's is it running, surely a safe one i hope, it wouldnt hurt to get it checked out at a tuner would it and just explain what is happening, they just might be able to tweak the tune retard the timing slightly so its a more of a safe area of play. Id say its in the tune in a short shot

Id say you just need to get the tune touched up in that area. Have a look on the tracer where its doing it and drop a couple degrees timing from that area. The extra load in 4th could be highlighting the issue.

thats really bad.

I have a GT3076 with 550cc injectors, powerfc, Standard manifold, 0.63 rear housing, etc and this morning I went for a blat at 6am, and at 22psi, and 300rwkw+, it got to 30 on the knock meter.

Your tune is shagged, get it checked properly.

Dynos don't load cars up enough.

yeah some tuners forget to compensate for one important force acting on a car on the road........ wind resistance.... gaurantee that in 4th and 5th flt out there is too much timing on the ramp.

It's not only wind resistance, but the terrain being travelled too. Loading an engine up a long, long climb is way different to what can be achieved on a dyno.

Any tuner worth their salt would (should) be running Datalogit, with wide band input. Really takes the guess work out of things. At that power level, your fuel system shouldn't be under strain, but why run with a non-standard FPR? Provided the fuel delivery and mapping is working as needed, it should be a matter of tweaking the ignition map.

Off thread, but can you post up some pics of your engine bay?

FPR cos my std one was supposedly leaning out, I don't need the rising rate, just a good qual fpr, and SARD are OK.

And thanks to all that responded, I didn't want to say what I thought cos I was after an unbiased opinion. But I agree with you, I'll have to have a look at the map and knock some timing out in the range where it is pinging.

I intend to get it on a dyno at another shop as well, and get a second opinion/tune.

As an aside - the first time I got high knock levels I thought it was maybe triggered by a random thing eg bad fuel, injector, other stuff...........but the next time was different fuel, and I couldn't feel anything wrong with the car, no miss or stutter, so I agree with everyone, its in the tune.

And Mafia - you run with MI, I don't, I might one day soon, but not yet, one step at a time for me, I'll get this setup sorted first.

Dale, I can do that, but there is nothing remarkable about my engine bay, its got some decent stuff in there, but its not a show car, its not polish and chrome, you'd see nothing unusual.

Normal drive you say its 10-15. Whats your knock levels like full throttle in say 1st to 2nd up to 100kh/h?

Haven't done it in 1ts or 2nd, but it doesn't do it in 3rd, and as I say if I ease it on and build up slower like floor it over say 10-20 seconds then it doesn't do it in 4th either, only when I floor it instantly.

But I reckon its the tune!!

Dale, I can do that, but there is nothing remarkable about my engine bay, its got some decent stuff in there, but its not a show car, its not polish and chrome, you'd see nothing unusual.

Come on, don't be shy... :ermm: Actually I'm just interested in how you've gone about doing the inlet trunking, and any heat shielding.

Haven't done it in 1ts or 2nd, but it doesn't do it in 3rd, and as I say if I ease it on and build up slower like floor it over say 10-20 seconds then it doesn't do it in 4th either, only when I floor it instantly.

But I reckon its the tune!!

I'd say with certainty it's in the tune. And going by own experiences and the above comments, would it be reasonable to suggest this happens at relatively low rpm and WOT? I struck this situation with mine on a test hill known to Mafia. Basically hit the hill around 2000rpm in 4th gear, steady throttle, and feed the throttle heavily into it. The hill is about 500 metres long and top rpm is about 4500. In that 2000-3000 bracket, the engine is loaded much heavier than can be achieved on a dyno. Basically you access cells in the map not normally hit, and if the ignition is too far advanced, it will knock. What makes it more noticeable is that the steepness of the hill keeps the engine operating within those cells for seconds at a time, rather than just flashing straight past them. On more level ground, the rpm picks up too fast for that load area to count for anything significant.

Mine was sorted with adjustments to about 5 cells in total.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
×
×
  • Create New...