Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Im in the process of sorting big brakes for my 32GTR, and i realized SAU doesnt have a thread with "what rims fit over what brakes"

So here it is :P

Post up what brake and rim combos have worked, and what hasnt for future reference

Template to copy and paste is below

Cheers :P

Car Model:

Year:

Rim size:

Rim name/type:

Rim offset:

Face type:

Brake brand:

Caliper size:

Disc size:

Rim internal diameter:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203894-big-brake-kits-and-wheels/
Share on other sites

There are some templates available for brake packages so you can check if they fit into wheels. Here are some random ones.

I would also suggest that the inner wheel diameter gets listed aswell as this changes from rim to rim. If anyone does the cardboard cutout thing please take a picture (or two) & post it.

The three pdf's are

1. Endless 6 pot on a 343 rotor.

2. AP CP5555 on a 343 rotor.

3. Alcon as per the data sheet.

6_3.pdf

p16004.pdf

Mono4_28mm_disc_Model__1_.pdf

post-5134-1201759382_thumb.jpg

Edited by djr81

yeah inner wheel rim diameter is key. it varies more than you could imagine with different brand wheels in the same 'size'.

troy and I have had this discussion many times, and I've measured a few sets of 17X9s I have. many sort of step down in the center, some are very flat. some rims just go on one sort of angle down from one side to the other (thus you have big step on one side, small step on the other). car wheels are a far more complex shape than you'd think.

but I have generally found, the good, japanese forged wheels have very thin rims, and very good internal diameter.

There are some templates available for brake packages so you can check if they fit into wheels. Here are some random ones.

I would also suggest that the inner wheel diameter gets listed aswell as this changes from rim to rim. If anyone does the cardboard cutout thing please take a picture (or two) & post it.

Thats exactly what i need!

Oh, and someone to donate their rims for measuring

I will willingly trade kidneys or sexual favours for the inner diameter of a Rays RE30, CE28 or Nismo LMGT4 in 17*9".

LOL..i will measure up the 17x 8.5: i have on the yard...will be damn close (LMGT4). And the GT4 and TE37 have more itnernal clearance then the CE28.

There was a thread i started a few years ago on this topic...perhaps rehash it as a lot of people posted their brake setups and wheel types in that thread

Had a look over the 22 pages of threads you've started but cant see it?!

I will willingly trade kidneys or sexual favours for the inner diameter of a Rays RE30, CE28 or Nismo LMGT4 in 17*9".

I just measured with a tape measure 420mm inner diam on my 18x10.5" RE30's...

You can forward your sexual favours and kidneys to this address...............

>_<

I thought I might as well post mine up, no one else did >_<

Car Model: R32 GT-R

Year: 89

Rim size:18x9

Rim name/type Road: Panasport C5C

Rim name/type Track: R34 GT-R

Rim offset Road: +18 (I think, I need a 5mm spacer the clear the caliper)

Rim offset Track: +30

Face type: ?

Brake brand: Porsche/Brembo GT3 monoblock

Caliper size: 6 - pot

Disc size: 355x32

Edited by sav man

Car Model: R32GTST

Year: 1990

Rim size: 17 X 8

Rim name/type: Speedy Hollow Type R

Rim offset: +35

Rim internal diameter: 410 mm

Front Brake brand: R32GTST M Spec

Caliper size: 4 spot

Disc size: 340 mm x 32 mm DBA 5000 Series

Pads: Hawk

Car Model: R33GTST

Year: 1996

Rim size: 17 X 8.5

Rim name/type: Enkie RPF1

Rim offset: +35

Rim internal diameter: 400 mm

Front Brake brand: R33GTST

Caliper size: 4 spot

Disc size: 324 mm x 30 mm DBA 5000 Series

Pads: Bendix Ultimate

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...