Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's a question for any experienced RB engine builders:

Apart from the slight difference in stroke, is there any difference in weight, balance/size of throws, or construction between the cranks in RB25 and RB26?

There are various people who've fitted 26-spec rods into their 25-spec engines, but no indicator as to whether they required any work to the crank to deal with the heavier (by around 50 grams each) GTR conrods.

Are there any/many experiences in this area please?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/203943-crankshafts-rb25-v-rb26/
Share on other sites

Just from what I know, I'm sure the difference between RB26 and RB25 pistons is the gudgeon pin position (to make up for the stroke difference)

But you have an excellent question Dale - looking forward to the answer.

Searching the forum before posting this question, I found posts from several of the more respected SAU members

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...rods+in+rb25%2A

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...rods+in+rb25%2A

So I know the issue of higher reciprocating mass has been (sort of) discussed. One thing that wasn't resolved was how to counter it. ie. did Nissan do anything about it with the basic engineering of the RB26 crank? and do I do anything about it while preparing to put 26 rods in bed with a 25 crank? It's one thing ending up with stronger internals, but if the engine doesn't rev as quick or sweetly then I wonder about the value of the upgrade.

This really does need comment from people who've had their hands in the bowels of a few RB engines, so I'm calling for a response from GTRgeoff, Duncan and Sydneykid please. Also Security, who has more recently stuck GTR rods into his 25.

thanks in advance

EDIT: the same principles should apply for people doing mods including forged pistons and rods, due to the changes in reciprocating mass, so I don't see the question as relating solely to the cheap upgrade I want to do. :D

Edited by Dale FZ1

i havent noticed a difference in how my car runs. im going to be turning my rev limit up to around 7500 and ill report back if anything pops.

it picks up speed the same as always and ive been using my launch control alot, and apparently its not too good on the rods and its held up fine for around 1.5yrs.

i dont have any more info on the whole mechanics/engineering part of it because i pretty much just got them cheap and threw them in when i had the chance, i didnt really look at anything else.

Apart from the slight difference in stroke, is there any difference in weight, balance/size of throws, or construction between the cranks in RB25 and RB26?

While I haven't bothered with the detail of the 26 crank, the throw is longer to achieve the increased swept capacity. Remember they are lower comp than RB25 so the pin to deck height is a fair bit lower in the pistons. From brief inspection the cranks are a very similar style between all RBs and all are nitrided.

There are various people who've fitted 26-spec rods into their 25-spec engines, but no indicator as to whether they required any work to the crank to deal with the heavier (by around 50 grams each) GTR conrods.

I did no extra work when I fitted 26 rods in the 25, just lightened the flywheel, radiused the bearing journals, chamfered the oil holes and had the oil plugs pulled and tapped, then flushed and used grub screws with loctite. It helps to get the rods x-rayed to ensure they will do the job if second hand and you MUST at least replace the bolts with stock or better.

In the 26/30 I'll be going further since I went forged Spool rods and CP pistons and using a decent harmonic balancer.

  • 3 weeks later...

Shame more ppl haven't coughed up any good info, as I've often wondered this.

Hell, im not even sure how one would increase the cranks counter weight to accommodate the heavier rods (all things being equal)

All I can think of, is threading the holes that are drilled into the counters (to adjust weight) and screwing in some mass, steel, depleted uranium etc :)

  • 8 months later...

The RB26 is a beefier stroner constructed crank to the rb25, as are the rods.

There are no mods required to the rb25 crank to run rb26 rods - and there is no noticable differnce in response when using the OEM 26 rods with a RB25 crank.

Edited by Spoolup

yeah, its just about building a stronger motor.

guys running nitrous on stock motors dont like to activate it before 3500-4000rpm as the rods wont take it, with beefier rods you will be able to cope with more torque at lower rpms, other than that you wont really get a performance gain.

i have wondered about doin this work to my rb25.. i was reading through this hpi magazine and it says a guy called PAUL CORNES president of sauwa has done it and says

" theres plenty of conjecture out there as to whether, the '25 block needs to be machined before it will accept the '26 crank, but paul assures us that it is a direct drop-in affair"

i think that would b the guy to ask

Yeah Paul is a good bloke, you'll find him in the WA section, I'm sure he'd answer any queries without any hassle what-so-ever.. Which is handy cause I too am looking at throwing an RB26 crank-rods into my RB25 NEO.. In that case, does having the RB26 crank and rods adjust the stroke at all??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...