Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been keeping a close tab on my fuel usage recently which is in the table below.

Reason i've done this is because I plan to get a PowerFC and plan to do some comparisons.

I have a R33 gtst with cat back exhaust, and an air filter. Next time I fill up i'll have a full exhaust + highflow cat + no exhaust leak. If anyone is interested I can continue posting updates and will let you know how the powerFC compares when I eventually get one.

Date----Price per litre-No. Litres------Total $-Distance--------L/100KM Number KM per $-Comment

22/10/2002----- 96.7--- 26.75---------- 25.87-- 218.3--------- 12.25----- 8.44

26/10/2002----- 97.7--- 47.41---------- 46.32-- 384----------- 12.35----- 8.29

29/10/2002----- 93.7--- 47.29---------- 44.31-- 395----------- 11.97----- 8.91-------- Cruise to Gong

4/11/2002------ 97.7--- 43.58---------- 42.58-- 349.5--------- 12.47----- 8.21

5/11/2002------ 94.7--- 18.18---------- 17.22-- 152----------- 11.96----- 8.83

12/11/2002----- 84.9--- 42.19---------- 35.82-- 330.8--------- 12.75----- 9.24-------- Filled with unleaded

20/11/2002----- 92.7--- 43.78---------- 40.7--- 336.5--------- 13.01----- 8.27

26/11/2002----- 95.7--- 34.82---------- 33.32-- 263.4--------- 13.22----- 7.91

3/12/2002------ 93.7--- 40------------- 37.48-- 291.8--------- 13.71----- 7.79

9/12/2002------ 96.9--- 44.44---------- 43.06-- 325----------- 13.67----- 7.55-------- Filled with Mobil

17/12/2002----- 94.7--- 33.22---------- 31.77-- 234.2--------- 14.18----- 7.37-------- Hard driving before this fill-up

24/12/2002----- 91.9--- 43.33---------- 39.82-- 321.2--------- 13.49----- 8.07-------- Used Vortex gld at Caltex

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well , I was getting 400+kms per tank sydney driving (includes 40kms of 100km/h driving per day) on my stock + zorst R33 (150rwkw)

After mods (now 220rwkw on low boost, (14PSI) ) I can just get 300kms to a tank and thats driving like a grandma mostly, with a few squirts here and there.

Hmmm and I do 100 kms per day round trip for 5 days per week. Add weekends and thats approx 2 tanks per week. @ 1.00 per litre thats over $100 per week just in petrol - Holy Fark !!

I drove to Yarrawonga for new years (600km round trip). I filled up at the servo accross the road from my house before I left and the fuel light came on when I returned to the outskirts of Melb. About 550+km to the tank sitting on about 120km/h most of the way. Not bad me thinks!

my 2c. filled up full 2 days b4 the vic cruise at albert park pits. about 55 - 60L. got 480k's out of it before i filled up. my best record yet. and that was full of twisties, traffic light drags and top speed runs too. :D so it wasnt completely granny driving... :D

i get my best economy when i go on cruises believe it or not. Mainly cause my normal driving is shorter trips. Only had my 34 for about 6 weeks but have recorded 385 kms from 36 litres - highway driving only.

The tank is 65 litres. Reviews i have read say that it is a little more economical than the 33, i have seen figures of 9.4 l / 100 kms quoted.

What I don't understand is I get around 470km's to a tank driving around adelaide with 10km trips to work then 10km's back.

I give it quite a bit and often have runs through to third flat stick.

When I take it through the hills with giving it a hard time the worse i have got is 430km's.

Arn't the R33's meant to be better than the R32's on juice.

This is running 16psi also.

Yeah I dunno what the story is - as I've said, no matter how much I get up it, it's unusual not to get 450-500km out of the tank before the light comes on... some of you guys must pull the bung out of the fuel tank or something :D

Just wondering if Auto and Manual could make difference as acceleration tendincies would change.

I have a manual turbl line and i try to drive conservitively but still find myself in front of the traffic after accelerating from the lights!

Where as with my old commodore it had power but was an auto and had a tendincy to 'cruise' and saved fuel...

what do you all think?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...