Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

R33 GTST, stock exhaust, Blitz Air pod.

in City

1) when the my car just arrive here, 300km per 50L.

2) Reset ECU, 350 per 50L (10.5:1 test on dyno)

3) Power FC, 420~450 per 50L (12.5:1 test on dyno),

highway

Power FC, 550~600 per 50L (12.5:1 test on dyno), however depands on how you accel...

notice accel much smooth and rev easy to pick up, therefore no need to accel hard..boost slight come in early, no over fuel less pop

also after dyno tune second day went to wakefild park, the engine is totally different, very resopsive compare to stock ecu.

most important is no fuel cut and speed limit cut..

:uh-huh: :uh-huh:

however as I said, it depands on how you accel..

from what i can gather from all the feedback, a stock skyline will average about 330-350km city driving and 410-450km highway driving...

skyzerr33: who tuned your SAFC? what a/f ratio are you running now? was it 10.5:1 stock? can you tune half throttle or less with the SAFC? some of you SAFC guys have some really good results and im really keen to hear how you did it....

with both the SAFC and PowerFC, can you adjust a/f ratio's when the ECU is in "closed loop" mode or less than half throttle? from my understanding the PowerFC is just a factory ECU that is tunable and when in closed loop mode is not tunable. Is this correct?

Guest Initiate

Forget expensive computers for now - you'd be amazed by how much difference a proper oil change can make. My car was using close to 16L/100kms when I first got it from the dealer, but after doing my first service and using 40W Penzoil synthetic, it improved to 13L/100kms.

If you expect good fuel economy, the I feel there are realy two main factors.

How and where you drive, and the mechanical condition and tune of the engine.

If the compression is as new, the oxygen sensor working, and you drive sensibly then the economy should be reasonable. If the engine is stuffed and you thrash it, well...................

Originally posted by ice180

skyzerr33 u must drive like Miss Daisy those fuel consumption figures are unbelievable...

yet i can pull 14.00's at the strip?

go figure no i'm just a smart driver.

as sidewaymambo said its how you accellerate. do it smoothly and no violently and you'll get better figures

plus 90% of my driving is on the highway cruising at 100kph. on my car thats about 2600rpm. i get these figures all the time. yes they go down when i give the car a burst or 5 during the week. but then it only drops to 550 per tank.

WA has better fuel as well its refined different as we have harsher fuel laws. Our petrol burns cleaner therefore giving more power and economy since the fuel is working more efficently in the engine.

i think ice180 meant you drove like miss daisy around town. your performance on the strip is irrelevant to the way you drive around town - or is it?

your amazing fuel consumption, i think, is from a combination of SAFC (and obviously who tuned it), the fact you do mostly hwy driving and somewhat more cleaner fuels...

i still want to know what a/f ratio your running and who tuned it!!!

hehe, what does pushing the brakes a few times do?

is that like pressing CTL-ALT-DEL on the keyboard??? :)

if i disconnect the battery for all of tonite, will this reset the ecu? can it do any other harm? this is how i used to reset the WRX...

Originally posted by 400HP

should be the same as R33's dude.... jsut disconnect the battery... push the brakes a few times... leave it for 15 mins or say

then wire it up and take it for a thrash

I been meaning to do it as well actaully....we can do it next week if you want

rhino

dude you must have majic fuel if you can get a gtr to do 10l/100k's. that is fricken magical

tell me your secret (seeing as the best nissan could get was 16.5/100 on the freeway)

cruzzing i get about 16-17

city i get 21

and fangging it i get about 25

reveal you secrects please please please

pete

I'm in the 450-500 per tank bracket too. I have a long drive to work which is mainly 80 and 100 zones, which definitely helps.

I'm getting my SAFC tuned soon, which should hopefully improve things even more.

When I was at the CAMS license day I was getting 300km to a tank.

I do 2500+kms a month in my R33, it's a work car.

Almost all of that is city driving. I accellerate quickly to the speed limit and cruise.

My fuel consumtion is 10L/100kms or slightly lower, 9something on the longer open road runs. I know this is fairly accurate as I log book and claim every single Km for tax reasons, have done this over more than 2 years.

A study conducted some time ago (VW did it I think) found that brisk accelleration used less fuel than a slow accelleration to the same speed (not the reason I do it I can assure you :D )

I don't drive like nanna, I only have two points left to show that!

You will get poor fuel ecconomy if you use 5th gear at speeds slower than 90km/h, I know some people who use it at 50/60kmh!

As mentioned before, the state of your cars tune will greatly impact on fuel ecconomy, as will general maintenence like tyre pressure and the one nobody remembers ----- change your frigin gearbox and diff oil regularly !

Fatz,

To be honest I dont know how I do it, just try and stay off boost as much as you can, at 110kph in 5th if you try and keep the boost around the -300mmHg on the factory gauge you do even better. Thats pretty hard to do though.

Not running more boost than factory, having new spark plugs and keeping the car in good service might have something to do with it.

But I agree when you fang it the fuel consumption goes through the roof.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...