Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Full exhaust with tuned length front pipes, and an ECU with the speed limited and I assume a few other things altered, and that is it power wise.

But your right one tap of the throttle and shes right on boost, I guess it's because I'm still in the early part of the ownership cycle where you notice every little thing about the way your car drives, what the gauges are doing and when etc.

At the moment I have done a mix of highway and stop start driving and I have done ~260K's on half a tank so thats about 12.5L/100K's with normal driving.

I find that not fanging it when cold does wonders for the fuel consumption. Generally I try to avoid giving it to the car when the oil temp gauge is below 70c, that way things are up to operating temp.

You will get poor fuel ecconomy if you use 5th gear at speeds slower than 90km/h, I know some people who use it at 50/60kmh!

Not necessarily - I use 5th gear at 60km/h if I'm holding speed and/or the road is going downhill. The motor isn't labouring at all, in fact it cruises along quite nicely. It's actually pretty surprising how little throttle is needed to hold it at 60 in top gear, unless of course the road rises, in which case you use 4th (or 3rd if it's a hill rather than a rise). Personally, I've found as a general rule of thumb, if I can go another gear higher and not use any more throttle (or even less sometimes, as it doesn't need as many revs) then it'll use less fuel. You can sort of just tell when the engine is happy at a particular rev - do what the car feels like it likes. That's just the way I drive though, it won't work for everyone.

Mine gets given the herbs fairly regularly, and it's very unusual for it not to get at least 450-500km out of a tank, with the majority of that being ligth city driving (driving in the city but not much traffic). Most I've ever got from 65L is around 950km... all highway driving, and it was on the Xmas/NY holiday, on the way to the North Coast, up one of the most ridiculously over-policed highways in the state (Bruce H'way).

hehe that was me who used 5th at 50-60km/h. I stopped doin that now, but still didn't really improve economy. A new 02 sensor and i got about 30km more and still to do a new crank angle sensor. Currently gettin 330-350km from a tank with cat back, bov and filter.....stock boost.

  • 3 weeks later...

I've been keeping a log recently and have got the following figures:

DATE | PRICE PER LITRE | NO. LITRES | TOTAL $ | DISTANCE | L/100km

22/10/02 | 96.7c/L | 26.75L | $25.87 | 218.3km | 12.254

26/10/02 | 97.7c/L | 47.41L | $46.32 | 384km | 12.346

29/10/02 | 93.7c/L | 47.29L | $44.31 | 395.0km | 11.972

All distances include heavy trafic, while the last entry included the cruise down the wollongong on the 27th.

What sort of figures are people getting with tuned Power FCs under similar conditions? I'm aiming at getting one in december after my final exam ever at uni (if I pass).

I have a air filter, exhaust, razo sticker, and standard boost.

Mark

sir ricelot you forgot to tell everyone you get those economy figures on *REGULAR UNLEADED*

*gasp*

i got 400 easily per tank, sometimes 500..........even got 700 once and i drive like a frigging maniac, go the s15s :D (this is on 12psi too)

you perth boys must remember that city driving in perth (or canberra etc) is about the same as highway driving in sydney, the same level of traffic stop start etc.

there is no comparison for peak hour traffic in sydney, unless you're comparing speeds with the push bike weaving thru traffic, in which he eaaaaaaaaaaasily wins........damn onarun and his bike.

  • 2 months later...

can i just add here, yes after 3 months...a powerfc has made no difference to fuel efficiency, however, i do have 500nm of torque over the whole rev range!? :P

for the sake of the original question asked....reset your ecu, try and use the same petrol brand, bp ultimate or whatever and manage your right foot....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They also make them with the motor mounted on the side 
    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
    • I only recently purchased the vehicle, it came with the flex setup but the current tune is e85 only, which is why im wanting to get the tune redone to enable a mixture.  First i need to get the exhaust redone tho. I was thinking of getting a varex muffler but it sems they dont fit well in the 33 (hang low because of the valve mechanism which sticks out on top) and generally dont sound good. So that leaves me with redoing the entire exhaust (more resonators and mufflers) so its not a menace when i come and go from home, and then have the aes dump valve somewhere along the line to really open it up. I was thinking of having it before the cat but after seeing how insanely loud it will be (on a vl turbo) im thinking of putting it more towards the rear of the car, after one of the resonators. 
    • At this point I'm just 'hoping' it's the turbo seals. I did speak to someone who said it's normal for these turbos to have a bit of axial play? Not gonna lie I've never checked a turbo for axial play before but you could hear it tapping a bit as I moved it back and forth. Surely that's too much? My theory is (could be completely wrong), bad axial play, worn bearings, bad seals, oil into dump/compressor side, burns in exhaust = blue smoke. On a timing belt related note, my crank pulley was missing that front plate that sits in front of the timing belt. It's that metal round plate. It did have the rear one, and the woodruff keys are in the crank which was nice. Can anyone confirm if the NEO det engine has a front plate, im sure it would to protect the front of the timing belt or something. Water pumps...the pump I got was an NPW (yes grill me if I should've got a genuine one lol). It has a smooth mating surface, kit came with a pretty pathetic looking paper gasket. Do I need to use any RTV or just trust the gasket will work because its a smooth mating surface? Cheers legends have a good Easter break!
    • Cheers man, I thought the same.   Bit of an update on it all. It was definitely blue smoke, not grey after all. It didn't really smell oily but it was blue after all. Also puffing just the smallest amount on idle with no throttle.   I ended up pulling the intake and exhaust off and there was around 3mm of axial play on the turbo shaft. So I figured we'll that's buggered and sent it off to get hi-flowed at hypergear. Haven't got it back yet.   I haven't compression tested it yet. Had a look in the cylinder and cylinder 1 spark plug, looked a bit sooty but not oily. Then I've just started doing my timing belt because it's age is unknown.
×
×
  • Create New...