Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been keeping a close tab on my fuel usage recently which is in the table below.

Reason i've done this is because I plan to get a PowerFC and plan to do some comparisons.

I have a R33 gtst with cat back exhaust, and an air filter. Next time I fill up i'll have a full exhaust + highflow cat + no exhaust leak. If anyone is interested I can continue posting updates and will let you know how the powerFC compares when I eventually get one.

Date----Price per litre-No. Litres------Total $-Distance--------L/100KM Number KM per $-Comment

22/10/2002----- 96.7--- 26.75---------- 25.87-- 218.3--------- 12.25----- 8.44

26/10/2002----- 97.7--- 47.41---------- 46.32-- 384----------- 12.35----- 8.29

29/10/2002----- 93.7--- 47.29---------- 44.31-- 395----------- 11.97----- 8.91-------- Cruise to Gong

4/11/2002------ 97.7--- 43.58---------- 42.58-- 349.5--------- 12.47----- 8.21

5/11/2002------ 94.7--- 18.18---------- 17.22-- 152----------- 11.96----- 8.83

12/11/2002----- 84.9--- 42.19---------- 35.82-- 330.8--------- 12.75----- 9.24-------- Filled with unleaded

20/11/2002----- 92.7--- 43.78---------- 40.7--- 336.5--------- 13.01----- 8.27

26/11/2002----- 95.7--- 34.82---------- 33.32-- 263.4--------- 13.22----- 7.91

3/12/2002------ 93.7--- 40------------- 37.48-- 291.8--------- 13.71----- 7.79

9/12/2002------ 96.9--- 44.44---------- 43.06-- 325----------- 13.67----- 7.55-------- Filled with Mobil

17/12/2002----- 94.7--- 33.22---------- 31.77-- 234.2--------- 14.18----- 7.37-------- Hard driving before this fill-up

24/12/2002----- 91.9--- 43.33---------- 39.82-- 321.2--------- 13.49----- 8.07-------- Used Vortex gld at Caltex

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well , I was getting 400+kms per tank sydney driving (includes 40kms of 100km/h driving per day) on my stock + zorst R33 (150rwkw)

After mods (now 220rwkw on low boost, (14PSI) ) I can just get 300kms to a tank and thats driving like a grandma mostly, with a few squirts here and there.

Hmmm and I do 100 kms per day round trip for 5 days per week. Add weekends and thats approx 2 tanks per week. @ 1.00 per litre thats over $100 per week just in petrol - Holy Fark !!

I drove to Yarrawonga for new years (600km round trip). I filled up at the servo accross the road from my house before I left and the fuel light came on when I returned to the outskirts of Melb. About 550+km to the tank sitting on about 120km/h most of the way. Not bad me thinks!

my 2c. filled up full 2 days b4 the vic cruise at albert park pits. about 55 - 60L. got 480k's out of it before i filled up. my best record yet. and that was full of twisties, traffic light drags and top speed runs too. :D so it wasnt completely granny driving... :D

i get my best economy when i go on cruises believe it or not. Mainly cause my normal driving is shorter trips. Only had my 34 for about 6 weeks but have recorded 385 kms from 36 litres - highway driving only.

The tank is 65 litres. Reviews i have read say that it is a little more economical than the 33, i have seen figures of 9.4 l / 100 kms quoted.

What I don't understand is I get around 470km's to a tank driving around adelaide with 10km trips to work then 10km's back.

I give it quite a bit and often have runs through to third flat stick.

When I take it through the hills with giving it a hard time the worse i have got is 430km's.

Arn't the R33's meant to be better than the R32's on juice.

This is running 16psi also.

Yeah I dunno what the story is - as I've said, no matter how much I get up it, it's unusual not to get 450-500km out of the tank before the light comes on... some of you guys must pull the bung out of the fuel tank or something :D

Just wondering if Auto and Manual could make difference as acceleration tendincies would change.

I have a manual turbl line and i try to drive conservitively but still find myself in front of the traffic after accelerating from the lights!

Where as with my old commodore it had power but was an auto and had a tendincy to 'cruise' and saved fuel...

what do you all think?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...