Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some crazy female, turning left on to a slip lane / merge with me (both turning left onto merge lane) decided to just stop for no reason there were no cars nothing!!! Then after inspection of my car there was no damage to it none just a tiny little mark on the plastics.

Now she trying to say that the right side of her boot is damaged from the impact but I only hit her on the middle and left sides (as we both turning left) the force needed to damage her car that much would have been very evident on my front bar and bonnet, (not the skyline but the comondore ute I have) Now the next thing is how on earth did I get anywhere near her boot when the front of my ute is at plastics hight of her boot not the metal part. Its been lowered.

f**king cow.

Karma will get you bitch!!!

Sorry need to vent

Edited by race_snooze
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/
Share on other sites

hahahaha i hate people like that, this reminds me of the time i was hit in mawson car park by some mum. first thing she said was did i hit u, i replied by saying insurance and details and some reinforcement on why some people shouldn't drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/#findComment-3621705
Share on other sites

Dude, she's prolly trying to get you to pay for damage that was already there.

Then she'll sell the car; iv heard about it before.

In dimly let areas, ppl slam on brakes, say they saw a roo and you pay for the damage (as the person behind alway does)

Edited by GeeTR
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/#findComment-3622419
Share on other sites

I was run into by someone in the same situation as that woman a few months ago. No offence, but THIS is exactly why I completely ignore what is coming from the right until the person in front of me has merged and is completely gone. I hate it when I see people in front of me who are going to merge looking to the right to see what's coming, instead of looking at the person in front of them who has yet to merge! Who on earth cares what traffic is coming if the person in front of you isn't gone? Esp if you plan on booting it.

Anyway, accident analysis by the damage inspectors should get you in the clear. If it went too far, I'd take her to court and have road forensic scientists tell her she's an idiot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/#findComment-3626805
Share on other sites

Well I looked forward and completely saw here moving forward as if she was merging so moved forward and looked right then looked back and she had slammed on the brakes in front of me!! I reacted and locked up mine then just a kiss to her rear plastic bumper.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/#findComment-3627019
Share on other sites

It's all good; I'm sure everyone had their best intentions in mind! I also know most everyone is quick to clamp down on anything remotely racist. I'm just one more that has to be cautious of it all, too!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/#findComment-3632544
Share on other sites

Now you'll all have to update your posts and change them to a joke as penance... you too Jayce cos yours has the quote :D

*waiting for the funny stuff to come :P

There once was a man from Nantuckett....

Nah, I wont go there!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/204381-stupid-people/#findComment-3633280
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...