Jump to content
SAU Community

First Impressions From Driving The R35


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

a good read!!

part 3 please....

ps: doesnt the need a 5000k run-in?? was told it needs a 5k run-in. saw the new r35 at Barbagello last week and the owner says it need at least 5k run-in b4 he can give the car a good rev.

Good work mate. I'm reliving all the memories of my drive vicariously through your post knowing it's going to be a long time until I drive another one.

I for one don't mind reading all the back story, good reviews are never just about numbers and boring facts most of us already knew anyway.

This almost sounds like a story you'd read in the Penthouse Forum

After all the wining and dining, did Koichi put out for you at the end of the night or were you left wanting?

hahah. :)

Jealous.

Thanks to all those who enjoyed the read and left some nice comments, much appreciated. :)

Edited by m3gtr
hahah. :)

Jealous.

Moving on, Thanks to all those who enjoyed the read and left some nice comments, much appreciated. :)

Ill be on part 3 this arvo. All's not perfect with the GTR, that much i can say.

Part 3...

30 minutes into the drive across Tokyo bay and in towards the skyscraper district known as Shinjuku, I'm feeling quite comfortable behind the wheel of the GTR. To me at least, its quite a user friendly vehicle - loads of power, stable, well behaved and solidly engineered. That slight lack of involvement, from a drivers point of view is one of the few problems the GTR has as its easy to become complacent with it from behind the wheel. The GTR almost does everything for you. More on that later.

I decide to change the suspension again to see what the "comfort" setting is like and much like the "R" setting, once activated, a change is almost immediately noticeable. In comfort, there is definitely more suspension travel. The GTR becomes more supple over the bumps and undulations and there is less of the rawness through the seat compared to "R" mode. It doesn't exactly float but you do notice the change in the way it deals with the road surface. I can't really tell if there has been any change in ride height, but when changing direction at speed or negotiating corners the GTR seems to roll a little more. Its not disconcerting, just not as hard edged.

The GTR's seats are very firm and grip the driver well, almost too well. While they have been beautifully crafted and offer a snug fit, i feel they wouldn't offer a big enough concession for the rigors of every day driving. They feel to me to have been engineered and designed on the side of performance over comfort which for certain applications is just fine but for others, may become a discomfort.

It tracks supremely well, and responds to steering input with precision. I quite like the way it handles. As I've already said, you get a lot of confidence through the wheel that the GTR isn't going to do something you haven't asked of it at any speed.

Overtaking is a breeze, in either A or M mode, just select a gear, plant the throttle and you are instantly transported around whatever was in front of you. This is also one of the GTR's short fallings. It lacks something fundamental in driver involvement. I feel like ive been slightly anesthetized, desensitized, behind the wheel of the GTR. While it is involving on a pure and raw level in regards to outright speed, feedback and handling, the lack of a clutch pedal and a 6 speed gate do detract from the pleasure that can be extracted from it. Whatever Nissan care to say about their choice in gearbox, i will say in the rear mounted dual clutched box's defense, that its design takes away the probability of NOT being able to extract what the car was originally made to deliver. Its foolproof in that respect but again, i know the GTR could even be more fun to drive, if ever there was a possibility of that actually being the case!

For real world users, the GTR's gearbox is perfect. It's the super car for dummies as you would, and doesn't have the fragility or highly strung temperament of many Italian or German cars that spring to mind. If you are a purist however, you will find yourself craving for a manual shifter. Nissan would be silly not to take a leaf out of Ferraris' book for example and include both the paddle shifter and manual versions in its future lineup.

In regards to stopping, the GTR's brakes are confidence inspiring and do their job more than adequately. Pedal travel is minimal and there is no shudder under heavy braking. A firm push of the well weighted pedal scrubs speed off rapidly. The pedal has a nice feel to it and decelerating quickly to negotiate a number of 90 degree bends from around 140kph didn't even so much as unsettle the car in any way. I was tempted to push the brakes further but thought better of it as this was my first time in the car. That and the fact that it had been snowing heavily in Tokyo the previous 2 days and the roads weren't completely empty.

With traffic and buildings becoming denser by the minute, i feel i just have to have another crack at the engine before we get boxed in. The road clears ahead of me, i wind the window down to hear the sound of the exhaust and engine - the air outside is chilled and crisp. I change down again into 3rd gear this time mashing the pedal to the floor, the GTR willingly, effortlessly, gets up and bolts ahead, blurring the scenery. Like a drug, the sheer speed that you can extract from the GTR will just have you coming back for more. I shoot into a tunnel- the exhaust note reverberates off the tunnel walls and as the revs pick up to a raucous rasping growl, 4th, 5th and 6th its Fast, too fast, have to back off. It can scare you silly if you let it. The engine note is understated at low revs but still signals ferocious intent further up the rev range. It really does go from kitten to clawed beast in a matter of seconds.

Final part later on.

thanx 4 reading.

Edited by m3gtr
a good read!!

part 3 please....

ps: doesnt the need a 5000k run-in?? was told it needs a 5k run-in. saw the new r35 at Barbagello last week and the owner says it need at least 5k run-in b4 he can give the car a good rev.

I havent heard that before. Perhaps youre right? Not sure, maybe others on the forum know the true answer. I wouldnt say i drove it excessively hard, but i did put it through its paces at certain points

lol, 5,000km run in? whoever told lcy that is having a laugh. by that measure it would take most owners about a year to get it run in. they are pretty much good to go from the factory but 500km or so is good practice before really giving it any boot.

it reminds me of the rumour about needing engine teardown every 12 months...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's something we all have to consider as time marches on. Also consider lifted rally MX5 conversion at that point.
    • I should be fine for a few more years, whilst I do have arthritis I also exercise and do mobility training every day to keep as fit and healthy as I can, military life, which is the actual cause of most of my joint issues, has set daily regimes, which I weirdly enjoy I also train alot smarter now, not really focusing on lots strength or puffy muscles, I'm more focused on maintaining what I have for my future older self, I actually train as much mobility now as I do exercising Check out this "simple" drill I have been doing daily prior to training now for a while now, this has worked wonders in my all round mobility   
    • I'd say one thing that may make you sell is the same reason the guy with the hard top roof sold his. He got old, and his back was giving him too much grief stopping him getting in and out... Old guy said he was 73! He looked and sounded younger than 73 to me! Or maybe I'm just aligning with old people more...
    • Already looked at a few prior to getting the MX5, really nice car, had all the mod cons, but I wasn't really sold on the new "look" I did miss my 2017 Limited, and I personally prefer the "look" of the older car over the new model, but, when pondering I kept going back looking at MX5's But it was same same for the new ND's, I wasn't sold on the new "look", especially the RF with its weird roof, which only half goes down, like a targa top sort of thing As I stated before, I did look at NC's, but the cars I looked at were PRHT's, but I didn't like their roof line "look" of the PRHT, until I saw the soft top version, (someone on SAU posted a for sale ad for one with a soft top that caught my attention, you can blame them for my choice.....🤣) and.... that old style detachable hard tops were available for them, which keeps the old MX5 more smoother flowing roof line, and the more rounded body style, similar to the NA-NB, to me, the arse end of the ND looks to "modern" Much like how I prefer the NC1 front bar, over the later models How long will I keep this car for is unknown, but currently, there's nothing else out there that "floats my boat" for a small, fun, little "sports car", that I can play with and enjoy looking at and driving But, who knows what the future holds, and going off current new car styling, if I replace it, it will be a older model something something       
    • looking forward to your t56 swap man its a game changer if it works! 
×
×
  • Create New...