Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I went through the RB25 dyno thread very carefully and found these results:

Basically, I averaged all the power outputs for each turbo and averaged the PSI the person was running.

Here it is:

HKS GT-RS: Cost $2,850 (full kit)

Average output was 243rwkw at 15.5 PSI

HKS GT2835 Pro S: Cost $3,600 (full kit)

Average output was 244rwkw at 15 PSI

GCG Highflow: Cost $1,950

Average output was 230 at 14.5 PSI

Garret GT3071R by GCG: Cost $2,600 (full kit without intake pipe)

Average output was 248rwkw at 15.4 PSI.

Now, I want to achieve around 260rwkw +- 7rwkw, thus, the GCG highlow is automatically out of the picture.

I am beginning to doubt that the GT-RS can make figures of around 260rwkw, unless you push the hell out of it (18 + psi) which wont be too good for the rods at that level of pressure.

I am intending to run 16 PSI and I want to achieve no less than 253 rwkw.

I am supprised how crap the results were for the HKS GT2835 Pro S, I thought most people would be getting around 270 rwkw, considering how much people talk up that turbo.

Anyone had any personal experience with GCG and their GT3071R turbo? any reviews?

I guess it's really a toss between the 2835 Pro S and the GT3071R. Considering the GT3071R is $1,000 cheaper, seems like a pretty good buy?

What do you guys think?

The HKS GT2835 Pro S is such a nice, very well talked about turbo, just the results aren't up their, sooooo disappointing.

There's hardly any difference between the GT-RS and the 2835 Pro S, and people pay an extra $800? soooo not worth it IMO.

What you have to remember is that HKS turbos are desighned to give their best at a fair bit more pressure then 15 psi, closer to 22 psi would suit them better and then they would realy start to show what they can do

average power makes a car fast - i would be looking at which turbo has the better average power curve

id say the 2835pros 0.87 on rb25 would have the best average power

What you have to remember is that HKS turbos are desighned to give their best at a fair bit more pressure then 15 psi, closer to 22 psi would suit them better and then they would realy start to show what they can do

22 PSI?! Yeh, and watch you standard internals go BOOM in a couple of weeks lol.

Decisions Decisions..... I seriously don't know which one to go for.... I love the HKS turbos, but they are so expensive when you take into account what you are getting.

average power makes a car fast - i would be looking at which turbo has the better average power curve

id say the 2835pros 0.87 on rb25 would have the best average power

Maybe so, nonetheless, the 2835 Pro S kit only comes with the 0.68 A/R.

I think the GCG hi-flow is good for over 250rwkw.

My car made 228.7rwkw on only 12psi at Racepace the other day so im expecting it to make over 250rwkw once i get a good set of injectors and a pump.

Alan.

I think the GCG hi-flow is good for over 250rwkw.

My car made 228.7rwkw on only 12psi at Racepace the other day so im expecting it to make over 250rwkw once i get a good set of injectors and a pump.

Alan.

Yes, cars do differ with the same turbo. Don't forget, once the GCG turbo is pushed (16 PSI and above) You will need a stronger diaphram for the wastegate or a stronger spring as you will see alot of wastegate creep.

GCG turbos become VERY inefficient after 16 PSI and are un reliable from what I've read.

More importantly, we are looking at averages here, yes, you do get the occasional turbo that pulls good results such as yours. I also found a GT-RS turbo pulling 300 rwkw. THis is why I am working based on averages.

I think to get a honest 270 rwkw you need to start looking at external gate options, the flappy flap things either spike or creep and anyone getting higher on those turbos is useing a happy dyno or is pulling them selves! IMO.

22 PSI?! Yeh, and watch you standard internals go BOOM in a couple of weeks lol.

Decisions Decisions..... I seriously don't know which one to go for.... I love the HKS turbos, but they are so expensive when you take into account what you are getting.

I think you are best run 17psi and just make sure the tune is on the money. 17psi isnt a lot of boost for a well tuned std engine. Its not boost that you have to keep an eye on. Its rpm, knock and engine temps. Keep those under control and a std RB25 will take a fair bit of boost reliably.

So, that said. I would go the HKS 2835 and give it a sniff more boost

Yes, $2,300.00, not including the $200 delivery, $100 duty fees, and $200 GST (tax).

In otherwords, $2,800.00 delivered to your door.

Holy cr#p that sucks, didn't realsie it cost so much to get over here.

Wow the gtrs went up in price from when i bought it last year, then again thats probably due to the exhange rate. Mine was $2300 delivered to my door from nengun. You wont get hit for tax from nengun, so your looking at about $2500 max.

As said above, its not boost that kills bottom ends, its detonation, overall power output, heat etc, ie most RB25s start getting weak at 270rwkw+ but then again heaps have gone further on a good tune. Its not a SR20 where you have to worry about valve bounce, so pushing 18 or 19psi isn't something you should have to worry about, as long as the tune is good.

Push 18-20psi through a GTRS or a 2835 and you will easily make your power output with supporting mods.

Maybe so, nonetheless, the 2835 Pro S kit only comes with the 0.68 A/R.

14001-AK001 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.68 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 100mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

14001-AK002 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.87 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 100mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

14001-AK007 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.68 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 80mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

14001-AK008 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.87 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 80mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

When calculating you AVERAGE output for the turbos, there a quite a few dyno figures in that thread (from memory) with peeps switching turbos and posting up results without the thing fully tuned and boosted up...

These results should be dropped from your calulation as they would be dropping your average.

Don't want someone with a 2835 running 12psi on a standard ECU or similar.

So, a GCG/RS/2835 should see you to 250+ with the last 2 going a few higher again.

You just need to find the right results.

14001-AK001 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.68 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 100mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

14001-AK002 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.87 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 100mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

14001-AK007 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.68 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 80mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

14001-AK008 HKS GT2835 Pro S Spec 56T A/R 0.87 T3 Flange Strong Actuator Attached 80mm Diameter AU $ 2,272.30 AU $ 2,433.84

The turbo KIT only comes in the 0.68 a/r. Yes, I know you can get the turbo in the 0.87 WITHOUT the kit.

When calculating you AVERAGE output for the turbos, there a quite a few dyno figures in that thread (from memory) with peeps switching turbos and posting up results without the thing fully tuned and boosted up...

These results should be dropped from your calulation as they would be dropping your average.

Don't want someone with a 2835 running 12psi on a standard ECU or similar.

So, a GCG/RS/2835 should see you to 250+ with the last 2 going a few higher again.

You just need to find the right results.

Those people have been dropped from my calculations. Moreover, any outliers (such as those people whom managed to obtain 300rwkw+ with a GT-RS) have not been included in my calculation in order to provide an accurate average with a normal distribution (otherwise, we'd have to start using medians).

Thus, the results I posted up remain very accurate. Please, feel free to do them yourself if you think I've left something out. :D

P.S - GCG going over 250 rwkw was VERY rare. There was only 2 people in my sample of 15 with the GCG turbo that got over 250rwkw and I believe both had aftermarket cams. Furthermore, I did not take into addition any GCG turbos with a VG30 exhaust Housing, only r33 exhaust housings.

This is a good thread.....Im pretty new and simple when it comes to all this stuff so Im enjoying the read!

Good research too zafeniak!

I have been looking at the gt-rs kit so will be keeping an eye on what everyone thinks! :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
    • The water pump is know to leak as well. So if the coolant is low checking that first as well as hoses. 
    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
×
×
  • Create New...